Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard surgical treatment for mid- and low rectal cancer; however, it is associated with specific technical hurdles. Transanal TME (TaTME) is a new procedure developed to overcome these difficulties, through an enhanced visualization of the dissection plane. This potentially could result in a more accurate distal dissection with a lower rate of positive circumferential resection margins, increasing the rate of sphincter-saving procedures. The indications for TaTME are currently expanding, despite not being yet standardized, and structured training programs are ongoing to help overcome the steep learning curve related to the technique. The procedure is feasible and safe with similar intraoperative complications and readmission rates when compared with conventional open or laparoscopic TME. Favorable short-term oncologic results have been reported: in particular, TaTME is associated with mesorectal specimen of a better quality and a longer distal resection margin that is established at the beginning of the procedure under direct view. Robotics, when available, will probably overcome the steep learning curve related to the complexity of TaTME. Long-term follow-up and ongoing RCT trials data are awaited regarding functional results, local recurrence and survival, and to facilitate the comparison with standard laparoscopic or robotic rectal resections. The present review is focused on critically analyzing the theoretical benefits and risks of the procedure, its indications, short- and long-term results and future direction in the application of TaTME.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garlipp B, Ptok H, Schmidt U, Garlipp B, Stübs P, Scheidbach H, Meyer F, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2012) Factors influencing the quality of total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 99:714–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Miyata S, Yamaguchi T (2009) Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery 146:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasivesurgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0927-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24:1205–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0965-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atallah S (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision: full steam ahead. Tech Coloproctol 19:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1254-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumont F, Goéré D, Honoré C, Elias D (2012) Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision combined with single-port laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 55:996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318260d3a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC, Carrere S, Gutowski M, Quenet F, Saint-Aubert B, Colombo PE (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56:408–415. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182756fa0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee GC, Sylla P (2015) Shifting paradigms in minimally invasive surgery: applications of transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 28:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. De Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernandez M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martínez-Palli G (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)–short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27:3165–3172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2872-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacy AM, Tasende MM, Delgado S, Fernandez-Hevia M, Jimenez M, De Lacy B, Castells A, Bravo R, Wexner SD, Heald RJ (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: outcomes after 140 patients. J Am Coll Surg 221:415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, Tasende M, Momblan D, Díaz del Gobbo G, DeLacy B, Balust J, Lacy AM (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, deBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Hunter L, Larach S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 18:473–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1095-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D, Han KS, Lauwers GY, Sahani DV, Sbeih MA, Lacy AM, Rattner DW (2013) A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3396–3405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2922-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP, TaTME Registry Collaborative (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Penna M, Hompes R, Mackenzie H, Carter F, Francis NK (2016) First international training and assessment consensus workshop on transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Tech Coloproctol 20:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1454-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Motson RW, Whiteford MH, Hompes R, Albert M, Miles WF, Expert Group (2016) Current status of trans-anal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) following the Second International Consensus Conference. Colorectal Dis 18:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13131 (PMID:26400670)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adamina M, Buchs NC, Penna M, Hompes R, on behalf of the St.Gallen Colorectal Consensus Expert Group (2018) St. Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 32:1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5990-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:3210–3215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Francis N, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Carter F, Hompes R, International TaTME Educational Collaborative Group (2017) Consensus on structured training curriculum for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Surg Endosc 31:2711–2719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5562-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Telem DA, Han KS, Kim MC, Ajari I, Sohn DK, Woods K, Kapur V, Sbeih MA, Perretta S, Rattner DW, Sylla P (2013) Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series. Surg Endosc 27:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2409-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Buchs NC, Wynn G, Austin R, Penna M, Findlay JM, Bloemendaal AL, Mortensen NJ, Cunningham C, Jones OM, Guy RJ, Hompes R (2016) A two-centre experience of transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis 18:1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koedam TWA, Veltcamp Helbach M, van de Ven PM, Kruyt PM, van Heek NT, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, Sietses C (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve. Tech Coloproctol 22:279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1771-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18:19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma B, Gao P, Song Y, Zhang C, Zhang C, Wang L, Liu H, Wang Z (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. BMC Cancer 16:380. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Deijen CL, Tsai A, Koedam TW, Veltcamp Helbach M, Sietses C, Lacy AM, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB (2016) Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 20:811–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1545-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Atallah S, Mabardy A, Volpato AP, Chin T, Sneider J, Monson JRT (2017) Surgery beyond the visible light spectrum: theoretical and applied methods for localization of the male urethra during transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 21:413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1641-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bjørn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62:A5105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjorn MX (2017) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5926-x (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kneist W, Rink AD, Kauff DW, Konerding MA, Lang H (2015) Topography of the extrinsic internal anal sphincter nerve supply during laparoscopic-assisted TAMIS TME: five key zones of risk from the surgeons’ view. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2026-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Franchini Melani AG, Diana M, Marescaux J (2016) The quest for precision in transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 20:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1405-332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Larach S (2015) Image-guided real-time navigation for transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 19:679–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1329-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Veltcamp Helbach M, Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, Sietses C (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes and experience after 80 cases. Surg Endosc 30:464–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4221-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rasulov AO, Mamedli ZZ, Gordeyev SS, Kozlov NA, Dzhumabaev HE (2016) Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1421-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70016-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Al Perdawood S, Khefagie G (2016) Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark. Colorectal Dis 18:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Noh GT, Ann YS, Cheong C, Han J, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK (2016) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcome and its related factors in rectal cancer. Medicine 95:e4367. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Neshakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2000) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP (2018) International TaTME registry collaborative incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: results from the International TaTME registry. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002653 (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Holmer C, Kreis ME (2018) Systematic review of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32:569–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5978-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hua L, Wang C, Yao K, Zhang J, Chen J, Ma W (2014) Is the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage different between laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer? A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials. J Cancer Res Ther 10(Suppl):272–275. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.151491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Velthuis S, Veltcamp Helbach M, Tuynman JB, Le TN, Bonjer HJ, Sietses C (2015) Intra-abdominal bacterial contamination in TAMIS total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 29:3319–3323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4089-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Koedam TW, van Ramshorst GH, Deijen CL, Elfrink AK, Meijerink WJ, Bonjer HJ, Sietses C, Tuynman JB (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome. Tech Coloproctol 21:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1570-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Pontallier A, Denost Q, Van Geluwe B, Adam JP, Celerier B, Rullier E (2016) Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision. Surg Endosc 30:4924–4933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4833-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rouanet P, Saint-Aubert B, Lemanski C, Senesse P, Gourgou S, Quenet F, Ycholu M, Kramar A, Dubois J (2002) Restorative and nonrestorative surgery for low rectal cancer after high-dose radiation: long-term oncologic and functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 45:305–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ, Velthuis S, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, Sietses C (2018) Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6276-z (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89:1551–1556. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02275.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tuech J, Karoui M, Lelong B, Paschold M, Kauff DW, Rink AD, Lang H (2015) A step towards NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 261:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1390-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kneist W, Wachter N, Paschold M, Kauff D, Rink A, Lang H (2016) Midterm functional results of TaTME with neuromapping for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1390-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. de Lacy FB, van Laarhoven JJEM, Pena R, Arroyave MC, Bravo R, Cuatrecasas M, Lacy AM (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32:2442–2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5944-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hu D, Jin P, Hu L, Liu W, Zhang W, Guo T, Yang X (2018) The application of transanal total mesorectal excision for patients with middle and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 97:e11410. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ, Diederik A, Spaargaren GJ, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, Sietses C (2018) Residual mesorectum on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) in rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6279-9 (Epub ahead of print)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Lelong B, Meillat H, Zemmour C, Poizat F, Ewald J, Mege D, Lelong JC, Delpero JR, de Chaisemartin C (2017) Short- and mid-term outcomes after endoscopic transanal or laparoscopic transabdominal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a single institutional case-control study. J Am Coll Surg 224:917–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Burke JP, Martin-Perez B, Khan A, Nassif G, de Beche-Adams T, Larach SW, Albert MR, Atallah S (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: early outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 18:570–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Marks J, Montenegro G, Salem J, Shields M, Marks G (2016) Transanal TATA/TME: a case-matched study of TaTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20:467–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1482-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Muratore A, Mellano A, Marsanic P, De Simone M (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for cancer located in the lower rectum: short- and mid-term results. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:478–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yao HW, Wu GC, Yang YC, Jin L, Zhang ZP, Chen N, Zhang ZT (2017) Laparoscopic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for middle-low rectal carcinoma: a clinical study of 19 cases. Anticancer Res 37:4599–4604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pellino G, Warusavitarne J (2017) Medium-term adoption trends for laparoscopic, robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) techniques. Tech Coloproctol 21:911–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1719-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gu JC, Tsang CB, Koh DC (2017) The da Vinci Xi: a review of its capabilities, versatility, and potential role in robotic colorectal surgery. Robot Surg Res Rev 4:77. https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S119317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hompes R, Rauh SM, Ris F, Tuynman JB, Mortensen NJ (2014) Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms. Br J Surg 101:578–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Pinan J, Quinteros F, Schoonyoung H, Albert M, Larach S (2014) Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 18:1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1181-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gómez Ruiz M, Parra IM, Palazuelos CM, Martín JA, Fernández CC, Diego JC, Fleitas MG (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 58:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Huscher CG, Bretagnol F, Ponzano C (2015) Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision: the key against the Achilles’ heel of rectal cancer? Ann Surg 261:e120–e121. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Tong YS, Chen CC (2017) Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-TaTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:249–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2686-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Verheijen PM, Consten EC, Broeders IA (2014) Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: experience with a first case. Int J Med Robot 10:423–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Atallah S (2017) Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): could this be the solution we have been searching for? Tech Coloproctol 21:809–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1697-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Emile SH, de Lacy FB, Keller DS, Martin-Perez B, Alrawi S, Lacy AM, Chand M (2018) Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: from top to bottom. World J Gastrointest Surg 10:28–39. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v10.i3.28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Mizrahi I, Sands DR (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a review. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2:144–152. https://doi.org/10.21037/ales.2017.08.07

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A special thanks goes to Francesca Aleotti MD for her precious help in linguistic reviewing and redrafting the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital and San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Vignali, Ugo Elmore & Riccardo Rosati

  2. Department of Surgical Specialties, Nephrology University “Federico II” of Naples, Naples, Italy

    Marco Milone

Authors
  1. Andrea Vignali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ugo Elmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Milone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Riccardo Rosati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Vignali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors mentioned in this study do not have any competing interest. This specific report does not endorse any specific Company.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

The informed consent does not apply since this is a meta-analysis study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vignali, A., Elmore, U., Milone, M. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives. Updates Surg 71, 29–37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00630-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-019-00630-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation