Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vacuum-assisted management of surgical site infections after liver transplantation: 15-year experience in a tertiary hepatobiliary center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immune compromised as well as critically ill patients are at higher risk of surgical wound infection and dehiscence. Wound infections critically influence the outcomes after liver transplantation. In particular, it was shown that they significantly reduce the overall survival rate when compared to patients with uneventful wound healing, and their occurrence is associated with death or graft loss within 1-year post-transplantation. From January 2001 through December 2017, 763 patients underwent liver transplantation in our Institution, the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, “Policlinico” University Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. We retrospectively analyzed data from our prospectively maintained database of patients treated with a negative pressure therapy device due to wound or abdominal infections. 13 patients underwent negative pressure treatments for surgical site infection after liver transplantation in our institution. Ten superficial “supra-fascial” applications (SF group) and three deeper abdominal (Ab group) were reported. Mean in-hospital stay for the SF group was 42.6 days, ranging from 8 to 80, while for the Ab group was 62 days (range 23–133), with an overall survival of 34 and 4.6 months, respectively. A multifactorial multidisciplinary approach is needed in the prevention of surgical site infections instead of mere antimicrobial prophylaxis The application of negative pressure wound therapy may help in controlling the diffusion of the infection and preventing sepsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pignatti M et al (2013) Treatment of wounds colonized by multidrug resistant organisms in immune-compromised patients: a retrospective case series. Patient Saf Surg 7(1):28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fishman JA (2011) Infections in immunocompromised hosts and organ transplant recipients: essentials. Liver Transpl 17(Suppl 3):S34–S37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Humar A et al (2001) Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression? Transplantation 72(12):1920–1923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cockbain AJ et al (2010) The impact of postoperative infection on long-term outcomes in liver transplantation. Transpl Proc 42(10):4181–4183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hellinger WC et al (2009) Surgical site infection after liver transplantation: risk factors and association with graft loss or death. Transplantation 87(9):1387–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Assirati G et al (2016) Vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients undergoing liver transplantation with necessity to maintain open abdomen. Transpl Proc 48(2):383–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Demetriades D, Salim A (2014) Management of the open abdomen. Surg Clin North Am 94(1):131–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Acosta S et al (2011) Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Br J Surg 98(5):735–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Almeida RA et al (2015) Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection in people undergoing liver transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD010164

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia Prado ME et al (2008) Surgical site infection in liver transplant recipients: impact of the type of perioperative prophylaxis. Transplantation 85(12):1849–1854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Davidson BR (2014) Methods of preventing bacterial sepsis and wound complications after liver transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006660

    Google Scholar 

  12. Avkan-Oguz V et al (2013) Risk factors for early bacterial infections in liver transplantation. Transpl Proc 45(3):993–997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Asensio A et al (2008) Effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the risk of surgical site infection in orthotopic liver transplant. Liver Transpl 14(6):799–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hellinger WC et al (2011) Association of surgeon with surgical site infection after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 11(9):1877–1884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zanus G, Boetto R, D’Amico F, Gringeri E, Vitale A, Carraro A, Bassi D, Scopelliti M, Bonsignore P, Burra P, Angeli P, Feltracco P, Cillo U (2011) A novel approach to severe acute pancreatitis in sequential liver-kidney transplantation: the first report on the application of VAC therapy. Transplant International 24 (3):e23–e27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dondossola D et al (2015) Negative pressure wound treatment of infections caused by extensively drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria after liver transplantation: two case reports. Transpl Proc 47(7):2145–2149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hobeika C et al (2017) Management of the open abdomen after liver transplantation. World J Surg 41(12):3199–3204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan T, Bleszynski MS, Youssef DS, Segedi M, Chung S, Scudamore CH, Buczkowski AK (2018) Open abdomen in liver transplantation. The American Journal of Surgery 215 (5):782–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peinemann F, Sauerland S (2011) Negative-pressure wound therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108(22):381–389

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Peinemann F, Sauerland S (2011) Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy is still unproven. J Wound Care 20(2):88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PM and FDB: study concept and design. TO and GT: literature review. VS and GA: data analysis. PM, RB and AP: manuscript drafting. RB, AP and FDB: critical revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Di Benedetto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have seen and approved the manuscript and are fully conversant with its contents. None of the authors has personal, financial or political interest in the material.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magistri, P., Olivieri, T., Serra, V. et al. Vacuum-assisted management of surgical site infections after liver transplantation: 15-year experience in a tertiary hepatobiliary center. Updates Surg 71, 457–462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0583-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0583-8

Keywords

Navigation