Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Liver surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decades, liver surgery had an extraordinary evolution and diffusion thanks to a drastic reduction of operative mortality and morbidity rates. A debate is ongoing about the need for centralization of liver resections in tertiary referral centers. Robust evidences showed that complex surgical procedures have lower mortality rates when performed in high-volume centers. The present expert group reviewed the literature data and proposed guidelines to identify surgical units that should be entitled to perform liver surgery in Italy. Three separate types of requirements were identified. First, the hospital requirements that include the following criteria: (1) a hospital of 1st level according to the Italian law; (2) the presence of a dedicated hepatobiliary or hepatobiliopancreatic unit or a team dedicated to liver surgery into a general surgery unit; (3) the mandatory presence of oncology, hepatology, radiology, interventional radiology, digestive endoscopy, intensive care, and pathology units; (4) the availability of a liver transplant team into the hospital or into another hospital within an established partnership; (5) a periodic multidisciplinary meeting. Second, the volume requirements: the unit has to perform more than 20 liver resections per year for malignant liver diseases with a 90-day mortality rate < 3 %. Finally, the organization requirements: the presence of specific diagnostic–therapeutic flowcharts for liver diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N et al (2003) One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg 138:1198–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg 240:698–708

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Torzilli G, Belghiti J, Kokudo N et al (2013) A snapshot of the effective indications and results of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in tertiary referral centers: is it adherent to the EASL/AASLD recommendations? an observational study of the HCC East-West study group. Ann Surg 257:929–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–406

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Giuliante F, Ardito F, Pinna AD et al (2012) Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm: results of an Italian multicenter study on 588 patients. J Am Coll Surg 215:244–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D et al (2000) Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg 232:777–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Torzilli G, Procopio F, Botea F et al (2009) One-stage ultrasonographically guided hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases: a feasible and effective alternative to the 2-stage approach. Surgery 146:60–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giuliante F, Ardito F, Ferrero A et al (2014) Tumor progression during preoperative chemotherapy predicts failure to complete 2-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: results of an Italian multicenter analysis of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 219:285–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittal S, El-Serag HB (2013) Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population. J Clin Gastroenterol 47:S2–S6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C et al (2006) Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 244:254–259

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Viganò L, Conci S, Cescon M et al (2015) Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with metabolic syndrome: a multicenter matched analysis with HCV-related HCC. J Hepatol 63:93–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P et al (2004) Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 15:460–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Ribero D et al (2006) Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 24:2065–2072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Viganò L, Rubbia-Brandt L, De Rosa G et al (2015) Nodular regenerative hyperplasia in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal metastases after chemotherapy: risk factors, preoperative assessment and clinical impact. Ann Surg Oncol 22:4149–4157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown KM, Parmar AD, Geller DA (2014) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 23:231–246

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Boni L et al (2015) Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a national survey. Updates Surg 67:129–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Viganò L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:410–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should Operations Be Regionalized? The Empirical Relation between Surgical Volume and Mortality. N Engl J Med 301:1364–1369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Folprecht G et al (2010) Tumor response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomises phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:38–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Torzilli G (2014) Ultrasound guided liver surgery, Springer, Berlin

  25. Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Knol JA, Upchurch GR Jr (2003) Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch Surg 138:185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Garcea G, Breukink SO, Marlow NE et al (2009) A systematic review of the impact of volume of hepatic surgery on patient outcome. Surgery 145:467–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tol JA, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ (2012) Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Dig Surg 29:374–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gruen R, Pitt V, Green S, Parkhill A, Campbell D, Jolley D (2009) The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality. CA Cancer J Clin 59:192–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hyder O, Sachs T, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Pawlik TM (2013) Impact of hospital teaching status on length of stay and mortality among patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg 17:2114–2122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. McKay A, You I, Bigam D, Lafreniere R, Sutherland F, Ghali W, Dixon E (2008) Impact of surgeon training on outcomes after resective hepatic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1348–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Viganò L, Langella S, Ferrero A, Russolillo N, Sperti E, Capussotti L (2013) Colorectal cancer with synchronous resectable liver metastases: monocentric management in a hepatobiliary referral center improves survival outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 20:938–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ravaioli M, Pinna AD, Francioni G et al (2014) A partnership model between high- and low-volume hospitals to improve results in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg 260:871–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Torzilli G, Minagawa M, Takayama T, Inoue K, Hui AM, Kubota K, Ohtomo K, Makuuchi M (1999) Accurate preoperative evaluation of liver mass lesions without fine-needle biopsy. Hepatology 30:889–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Via A. Manzoni, 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy

    Guido Torzilli & Luca Viganò

  2. Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

    Felice Giuliante

  3. Liver and Multiorgan Transplant Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Antonio Daniele Pinna

Authors
  1. Guido Torzilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luca Viganò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felice Giuliante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antonio Daniele Pinna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Torzilli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement of human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torzilli, G., Viganò, L., Giuliante, F. et al. Liver surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it. Updates Surg 68, 135–142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0373-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0373-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation