Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consequences of defensive medicine, second victims, and clinical-judicial syndrome on surgeons’ medical practice and on health service

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased knowledge in disease causes and progression, along with technological and technical advancements in their diagnosis and treatment, have led to increased expectations from physicians by patients and their relatives. The condition of “second victim” is known to affect caregivers that commit an error, and seriously impairs private life and subsequent practice. Besides, a condition has been described, the clinical-judicial syndrome, affecting caregivers at any moment during a medical litigation. In this scenario, physicians have started to practice “defensive medicine”, aimed at protect themselves from liability rather than actually advancing care of patients. This paper represents the first review on defensive medicine with specific focus on surgery in an Italian setting. We reviewed the literature on the topic, with particular focus on surgeons and Italian current status, and provide the readers with a snapshot on these relevant issues, proposing strategies to prevent and reduce the practice of defensive medicine, and to support patients and physicians suffering from medical errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CJS:

Clinical-judicial syndrome

DM:

Defensive medicine

References

  1. McQuade JS (1991) The medical malpractice crisis—reflections on the alleged causes and proposed cures: discussion paper. J R Soc Med 84:408–411

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1994) Defensive medicine and medical malpractice. http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/policy/9405.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2015

  3. Hurtado Hoyo E, Gutiérrez Zaldívar H, Iraola N, Rodríguez A (2006) Síndrome Clínico Judicial. Rev Asoc Med Argent 119:8–16

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu AW (2000) Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 320:726–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Santoro E (2014) Clinical-judicial syndrome: how a doctor becomes a patient through general indifference. Updates Surg 66:173–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Italian Board of Health (2011) Linee guida per gestire e comunicare gli Eventi Avversi in sanità. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1563_allegato.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2015

  7. Panella M, Rinaldi C, Vanhaecht K, Donnarumma C, Tozzi Q, Di Stanislao F (2014) Second victims of medical errors: a systematic review of the literature. Ig Sanita Pubbl 70:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, Vleugels A, Euwema M, Panella M, Scott SD, Conway J, Sermeus W, Vanhaecht K (2013) Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 36:135–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez W, Lo B (2008) Medical students’ experiences with medical errors: an analysis of medical student essays. Med Educ 42:733–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mavroforou A, Malizos K, Karachalios T, Chatzitheofilou K, Giannoukas AD (2014) Punitive limb amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3102–3106

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cacciola NA, Calabrese C, Malapelle U et al (2015) UbcH10 expression can predict prognosis and sensitivity to the antineoplastic treatment for colorectal cancer patients. Mol Carcinog. doi:10.1002/mc.22322 (epub ahead of print)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Selvaggi F, Cuocolo A, Sciaudone G, Maurea S, Giuliani A, Mainolfi C (2003) FGD-PET in the follow-up of recurrent colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 5:496–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Speicher PJ, Ligh C, Scarborough JE et al (2014) A simple scoring system for risk-stratifying rectal cancer patients prior to radical resection. Tech Coloproctol 18:459–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Selvaggi F, Pellino G, Sciaudone G et al (2014) Development and validation of a practical score to predict pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1401–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pellino G, Petronella P, Selvaggi F (2014) Gradual staple line disruption presenting with subtle multidiverticular pocket syndrome after STARR. Updates Surg 66:291–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Selvaggi F, Fucini C, Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Maretto I, Mondi I, Bartolini N, Caminati F, Pucciarelli S (2015) Outcome and prognostic factors of local recurrent rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 150 patients. Tech Coloproctol 19:135–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi F, Canonico S (2015) Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in colorectal surgery. Effects on surgical site events: current status and call to action. Updates Surg 67:235–245. doi:10.1007/s13304-015-0298-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saladino E, Fleres F, Irato S, Famulari C, Macrì A (2014) The role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer relapse. Updates Surg 66:109–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amato A, Pellino G, Secondo P, Selvaggi F (2015) Intersphincteric approach for rectourethral fistulas following radical prostatectomy. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-015-1346-x (epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G et al (2014) Preventive NPWT over closed incisions in general surgery: does age matter? Int J Surg 12(Suppl 2):S64–S68. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G, Selvaggi F (2015) Effect of surgery on health-related quality of life of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58:753–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G et al (2013) Complications and functional outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in the elderly. BMC Surg 13(Suppl 2):S9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G, De Fatico GS, Landino I, Canonico S, Selvaggi F (2014) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is safe and effective in selected very elderly patients suffering from ulcerative colitis. Int J Surg 12(Suppl 2):S56–S59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Melotti G, De Antoni E, Habr-Gama A, Minicozzi A (2013) Management of distal rectal cancer: results from a national survey. Updates Surg 65:43–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Canonico S, Pellino G, Pameggiani D et al (2014) Thyroid surgery in the elderly: a comparative experience of 400 patients from an italian university hospital. Int Surg 99:523–527

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G et al (2013) Early postoperative administration of probiotics versus placebo in elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg 13(Suppl 2):S57

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pellino G, Selvaggi F (2015) Outcomes of salvage surgery for ileal pouch complications and dysfunctions. The experience of a referral centre and review of literature. J Crohns Colitis 9:548–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aasland OG, Forde R (2005) Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors’ personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. Qual Saf Health Care 14:13–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, Fraser VJ, Levinson W (2003) Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA 289:1001–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Waterman AD, Garbutt J, Hazel E, Dunagan WC, Levinson W, Fraser VJ, Gallagher TH (2007) The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 33:467–476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Studdert DM, Melle MM, Sage WM et al (2005) Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physician in a volatile malpractise environment. JAMA 293:2609–2617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Massachusetts Medical Society (2008) Investigation of defensive medicine in Massachusetts. http://www.massmed.org/advocacy/key-issues/professional-liability/defensive-medicine-report-2008-(pdf,-829-kb,-19-pages)/. Accessed 25 July 2015

  33. Association of Physicians of Rome (2010) Chi si difende da chi? E perché? I dati della prima ricerca nazionale sulla Medicina Difensiva. http://www.quotidianosanita.it/allegati/allegato9848861.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2015

  34. Diederich Healthcare (2015) 2015 Medical malpractice payout analysis. http://www.diederichhealthcare.com/the-standard/2015-medical-malpractice-payout-analysis/. Accessed July 25 2015

  35. Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali (2014) http://www.agenas.it/images/agenas/In%20primo%20piano/medicina_difensiva/risultati_ricerca_medicina_difensiva.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2015

  36. Panella M, Rinaldi C, Leigheb F, Tozzi Q (2015) Medicina difensiva: sperimentazione di un modello per la valutazione della sua diffusion e del relativo impatto economico. I quaderni di Monitor:29–50. http://www.agenas.it/images/agenas/monitor/quaderno/pdf/15_medicina_difensiva.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2015

  37. Pellino G, Selvaggi F, Ghezzi G, Corona D, Riegler G, Delaini GG (2015) A think tank of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) on the surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease using the Delphi method: Crohn’s disease. Tech Coloproctol 19:639–651. doi:10.1007/s10151-015-1368-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Selvaggi F, Pellino G, Ghezzi G, Corona D, Riegler G, Delaini GG (2015) A think tank of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) on the surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease using the Delphi method: ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol 19:627–638. doi:10.1007/s10151-015-1367-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaw D, Elger B (2013) Evidence-based persuasion: an ethical imperative. JAMA 309:1689–1690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moynihan R, Smith R (2002) Too much medicine? BMJ 324:859–860

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Via Giotto 60, 81031, Aversa, CE, Italy

    Italia Maria Pellino

  2. Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurologic, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy

    Gianluca Pellino

Authors
  1. Italia Maria Pellino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gianluca Pellino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Italia Maria Pellino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation with this research.

Ethical standard

The review article is in accordance with the ethical standards.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pellino, I.M., Pellino, G. Consequences of defensive medicine, second victims, and clinical-judicial syndrome on surgeons’ medical practice and on health service. Updates Surg 67, 331–337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0338-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0338-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation