Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this review is to characterize the functional results and “anterior resection syndrome” (ARS) after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. The purpose of sphincter-saving operations is to save the anal sphincters by avoiding the need for rectal abdomino-perineal resection with a permanent stoma. A variety of alternative techniques have been proposed and, today, ultra-low anterior resections of the rectum are commonplace. Inevitably rectal resections modify anorectal physiology. The backdrop of the functional asset for ultralow anterior resections is related to a small neorectal capacity with high endo-neorectal pressures that act together on a weakened sphincteric mechanism. Sometimes a defecation disorder called ARS may be induced and the patient experiences an extremely low quality of life. Impaired bowel function is usually provoked either by colonic dysmotility, neorectal reservoir dysfunction, anal sphincter damage or by a combination of these factors. Surgical technique defects can contribute to these possible causes: anastomotic ischemia, short length of the descending colon and stretching of neorectal mesentery may play a role. Unfortunately, there is no therapeutic algorithm or gold standard treatment that may be used for ARS. Nevertheless, it is rational to use conservative therapy first and then resort to surgery. Drugs, rehabilitative treatment and sacral neuromodulation may be used; after failure of conservative methods, surgical treatment can be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J et al (2007) Prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy. Ann Surg 245:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cutait DE, Figliolini FG (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mason AY (1972) Trans-sphincteric exposure for low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parks AG (1972) Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:975–976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F et al (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim MK, Lim DJ, Yun SH et al (2001) Ultralow anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer: functional and oncological results. Int J Colorect Dis 16:234–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morihiro M, Koda K, Seike K et al (2008) Characteristics findings on defecography according to reconstruction method and defecatory disorders following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:883–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kusunoki M, Okamoto T, Yoshikawa H (1996) Defecographic assessment after colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:971–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De la Fuente SG, Mantyh CR (2007) Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what’s the best? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 20:221–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pucciani F, Bologna A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C (1993) Anorectal physiology following sphincter saving operations for rectal cancer. Dig Surg 10:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ et al (1995) Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 38:411–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bharucha AE (2006) Pelvic floor: anatomy and function. Neurogatroenterol Motil 18:507–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stebbing JF, Brading AF, Mortensen NJ (1996) Nitric oxide and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex: retrograde neuronal tracing reveals a descending nitrergic rectoanal pathway in a guinea-pig model. Br J Surg 83:493–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P et al (1992) Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 35:874–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Horgan AF, Molloy RG, Coulter J (1993) Nerve regeneration across colorectal anastomoses after low anterior resection in a canine model. Int J Colorectal Dis 8:167–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baek SK, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J 19:140–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson MER, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ (1994) Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1228–1231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seow-Choen F, Goh HS (1995) Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 82:608–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tonelli F, Garcea A, Batignani G (2005) Different role of the colonic pouch for low anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 9:15–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW (2002) Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2282–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oya M, Sugamata Y, Komatsu J et al (2002) Poor neorectal evacuation as a cause of impaired defecatory function after low anterior resection: a study using scintigraphic assessment. Surg Today 32:111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG et al (2005) The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1353–1365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Emmersten KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sprangers MA, Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 3:238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ziv Y, Zbar A, Bar-Shavit Y, Igov I (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee WY, Takahashi T, Pappas T et al (2008) Surgical autonomic denervation results in altered colonic motility: an explanation for low anterior resection syndrome? Surgery 143:778–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bassotti G, De Roberto G, Chistolini F et al (2005) Case report: colonic manometry reveals abnormal propulsive behaviour after anterior resection of the rectum. Dig Liver Dis 37:124–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee SJ, Park YS (1998) Serial evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:241–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Birnbaum EH, Myerson RJ, Fry RD et al (1994) Chronic effects of pelvic radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 37:909–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gervaz P, Rotholtz N, Pisano M et al (2001) Quantitative short term study of anal sphincter function after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 41:543–551

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lundby L, Krogh K, Jensen VJ et al (2005) Long-term anorectal dysfunction after postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1349–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bakx R, Doeksen A, Slors FM et al (2009) Neorectal irritability after short-term preoperative radiotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 104:133–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Halböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M et al (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA et al (1997) Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Sug 84:1449–1451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hida J, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T et al (2004) Comparison of long-term functional results of colonic J-pouch and straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a five-year follow up. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1578–1585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fürst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, Jauch KW (2002) Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:660–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Murphy J, Hammond TM, Knowles CH et al (2007) Does anastomotic techniques influence anorectal function after sphincter-saving rectal cancer resection? A systematic review of evidence from randomized trials. J Am Coll Surg 204:673–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS (2008) Reconstructive techniques after rectal resections for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16: CD006040

  41. Baker JW (1950) Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis: description of the technique. Arch Surg 61:143–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Z’graggen K, Maurer CA, Büchler MW (1999) Transverse coloplasty pouch. A novel neorectal reservoir. Dig Surg 16:363–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liao C, Gao F, Cao Y et al (2010) Meta-analysis of the colon J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty pouch after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 12:624–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Mantyh CR, Hull TL, Fazio VW (2001) Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tsang WWC, Chung CC, Kwok SY, Li MKV (2006) Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. Ann Surg 243:353–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ho YH, Tsang C, Tang CL et al (2000) Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 43:169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR (1998) Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 41:888–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Brown SR, Seow-Choen F (2000) Preservation of rectal function after low anterior resection with formation of a neorectum. Semin Surg Oncol 19:376–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Akagi Y, Kinugasa T, Shirouzu K (2012) Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review. Surg Today. doi:10.1007/s00595-012-0394-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gamagami R, Istvan G, Cabarrot P et al (2000) Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses. Surgery 127:291–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pollack J, Holm T, Cedermark B et al (2006) Long-term effect of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 49:345–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Heald B (2008) Autonomic nerve preservation in rectal cancer surgery—the forgotten part of the TME message. A practical “workshop” description for surgeons. Acta Chir Iugosl 55:11–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ehrenpreis ED, Chang D, Eichenwald E (2007) Pharmacotherapy for fecal incontinence: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 50:641–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hanauer SB (2008) The role of loperamide in gastrointestinal disorders. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 8:15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Markland AD, Richter HE, Burgio KL et al (2008) Outcomes of combination treatment of fecal incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 699.e1–699.e7

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sze EH, Hobbs G (2009) Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:766–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ho YH, Chiang GM, Tan M, Low JY (1996) Biofeedback therapy for excessive stool frequency and incontinence following anterior resection or total colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1289–1292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Allgayer H, Christoph FD, Rohde W et al (2005) Prospective comparison of short- and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for rectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1168–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pucciani F, Ringressi MN, Redditi S et al (2008) Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1552–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Maris A, Devreese AM, D’Hoore A (2012) Treatment options to improve anorectal function following rectal resection: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/codi.12036

    Google Scholar 

  61. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Bittorf B et al (2002) Bilateral sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence after low anterior rectum resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:430–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A et al (2005) Sacral neuromodulation in treatment of fecal incontinence following anterior resection and chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1027–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Vironen JH, Kairaluoma M, Aalto AM et al (2006) Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:568–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Digennaro R, Tondo M, Cuccia F et al (2012) Coloanal anastomosis or abdominal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon’s pride or the patient’s quality of life? Int J Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1007/s00384-012-1629-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy

    Filippo Pucciani

Authors
  1. Filippo Pucciani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Pucciani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pucciani, F. A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome. Updates Surg 65, 257–263 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0220-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0220-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation