Abstract
Robotic surgery in Italy has become a clinical reality that is gaining increasing acceptance. As of 2011 after the United States, Italy together with Germany is the country with the largest number of active Robotic centers, 46, and da Vinci Robots installed, with at least 116 operators already trained. The number of interventions performed in Italy in 2011 exceeded 6,000 and in 2010 were 4,784, with prevalence for urology, general surgery and gynecology, however these interventions have also begun to be applied in other fields such as cervicofacial, cardiothoracic and pediatric surgery. In Italy Robotic centers are mostly located in Northern Italy, while in the South there are only a few centers, and four regions are lacking altogether. Of the 46 centers which were started in 1999, the vast majority is still operational and almost half handle over 200 cases a year. The quality of the work is also especially high with large diffusion of radical prostatectomy in urology and liver resection and colic in general surgery. The method is very well accepted among operators, over 80 %, and among patients, over 95 %. From the analysis of world literature and a survey carried out in Italy, Robotic surgery, which at the moment could be better defined as telesurgery, represents a significant advantage for operators and a consistent gain for the patient. However, it still has important limits such as high cost and non-structured training of operators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Morris B (2005) Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. Med Gen Med 7(3):72
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21
Amodeo A (2009) Linares Quevedo A, Joseph JV, Belgrano E, Patel HR. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Minerva Urol Nefrol 61(2):121–128
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784
Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325 discussion 311–312
Tang VCY, Stacey NC (2007) Robotic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(4):447–448
Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Ng WS, Timoney AG, Wickham JE (1991) The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 205(1):35–38
Murphy D, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2006) Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad Med J 82(973):743–747
Babbar P, Hemal AK (2011) Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010 - Advancements and future outlook. Urol Ann 3(1):1–7
Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063
Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2010) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 57(3):453–458
Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R (2009) Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int 104(11):1722–1729
Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, Lee JW, Rim JS (2011) Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol 52(4):279–283
Kim YT, Kim SW, Jung YW (2008) Robotic surgery in gynecologic field. Yonsei Med J 49(6):886–890
Debernardo R, Starks D, Barker N, Armstrong A, Kunos CA (2011) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011:139867
Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2011) The impact of robotic surgery on gynecologic oncology. J Gynecol Oncol 22(3):196–202
Baik SH (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J 49(6):891–896
D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2162–2168
Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632
Baek SJ, Lee DW, Park SS, Kim SH (2011) Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(10):137–143
Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586
Panaro F, Piardi T, Cag M, Cinqualbre J, Wolf P, Audet M (2011) Robotic liver resection as a bridge to liver transplantation. JSLS 15(1):86–89
Tsirbas A, Mango C, Dutson E (2007) Robotic ocular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 91(1):18–21
Douglas R (2007) Robotic surgery in ophthalmology: reality or fantasy? Br J Ophthalmol 91(1):1
Widmann G (2007) Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area. Biomed Imaging Interv J 3(1):e11
Awang MS, Abdullah MZ (2011) Robotic neurosurgery: a preliminary study using an active vision-guided robotic arm for bone drilling and endoscopic manoeuvres. Malays J Med Sci 18(2):53–57
Chitwood WR Jr (2011) Robotic cardiac surgery by 2031. Tex Heart Inst J 38(6):691–693
Woo YJ (2006) Robotic cardiac surgery. Int J Med Robot 2(3):225–232
Nakamura N, Sugano N, Nishii T, Kakimoto A, Miki H (2010) A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(4):1072–1081
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santoro, E., Pansadoro, V. Robotic surgery in Italy national survey (2011). Updates Surg 65, 1–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0190-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0190-z