Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic surgery in Italy national survey (2011)

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robotic surgery in Italy has become a clinical reality that is gaining increasing acceptance. As of 2011 after the United States, Italy together with Germany is the country with the largest number of active Robotic centers, 46, and da Vinci Robots installed, with at least 116 operators already trained. The number of interventions performed in Italy in 2011 exceeded 6,000 and in 2010 were 4,784, with prevalence for urology, general surgery and gynecology, however these interventions have also begun to be applied in other fields such as cervicofacial, cardiothoracic and pediatric surgery. In Italy Robotic centers are mostly located in Northern Italy, while in the South there are only a few centers, and four regions are lacking altogether. Of the 46 centers which were started in 1999, the vast majority is still operational and almost half handle over 200 cases a year. The quality of the work is also especially high with large diffusion of radical prostatectomy in urology and liver resection and colic in general surgery. The method is very well accepted among operators, over 80 %, and among patients, over 95 %. From the analysis of world literature and a survey carried out in Italy, Robotic surgery, which at the moment could be better defined as telesurgery, represents a significant advantage for operators and a consistent gain for the patient. However, it still has important limits such as high cost and non-structured training of operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morris B (2005) Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. Med Gen Med 7(3):72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amodeo A (2009) Linares Quevedo A, Joseph JV, Belgrano E, Patel HR. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Minerva Urol Nefrol 61(2):121–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325 discussion 311–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang VCY, Stacey NC (2007) Robotic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(4):447–448

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Ng WS, Timoney AG, Wickham JE (1991) The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 205(1):35–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy D, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2006) Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad Med J 82(973):743–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Babbar P, Hemal AK (2011) Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010 - Advancements and future outlook. Urol Ann 3(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2010) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 57(3):453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R (2009) Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int 104(11):1722–1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, Lee JW, Rim JS (2011) Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol 52(4):279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim YT, Kim SW, Jung YW (2008) Robotic surgery in gynecologic field. Yonsei Med J 49(6):886–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Debernardo R, Starks D, Barker N, Armstrong A, Kunos CA (2011) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011:139867

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2011) The impact of robotic surgery on gynecologic oncology. J Gynecol Oncol 22(3):196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baik SH (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J 49(6):891–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2162–2168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baek SJ, Lee DW, Park SS, Kim SH (2011) Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(10):137–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Panaro F, Piardi T, Cag M, Cinqualbre J, Wolf P, Audet M (2011) Robotic liver resection as a bridge to liver transplantation. JSLS 15(1):86–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsirbas A, Mango C, Dutson E (2007) Robotic ocular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 91(1):18–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Douglas R (2007) Robotic surgery in ophthalmology: reality or fantasy? Br J Ophthalmol 91(1):1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Widmann G (2007) Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area. Biomed Imaging Interv J 3(1):e11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Awang MS, Abdullah MZ (2011) Robotic neurosurgery: a preliminary study using an active vision-guided robotic arm for bone drilling and endoscopic manoeuvres. Malays J Med Sci 18(2):53–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chitwood WR Jr (2011) Robotic cardiac surgery by 2031. Tex Heart Inst J 38(6):691–693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Woo YJ (2006) Robotic cardiac surgery. Int J Med Robot 2(3):225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakamura N, Sugano N, Nishii T, Kakimoto A, Miki H (2010) A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(4):1072–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenio Santoro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santoro, E., Pansadoro, V. Robotic surgery in Italy national survey (2011). Updates Surg 65, 1–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0190-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0190-z

Keywords

Navigation