Skip to main content
Log in

Care with regard to details improves the outcome of Longo mucoprolapsectomy: long term follow up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we evaluated the results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy considering the histological features of the resected tissue obtained after the intervention, the staple line height and the improvement of the quality of life after the treatment. From January 2003 to December 2006, 72 patients with symptomatic grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoid that underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy in our clinic were enroled in the study. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics of the patients were evaluated, including demographics, staple line height, specimen histology, complications, recurrence, day to return to work, quality of life (QoL) score and use of analgesics. Staple line height was always above 2.5 cm from the dentate line. Smooth muscle fibers were observed in 97.2%. The complication rate was 18%. Bleeding was observed in 5.5%. Fecal urgency was referred in 6.9%. Recurrence rate was 6.9%. Mean follow-up was 68 months. Hemorrhoidopexy is safe and effective but extreme attention must be paid to some critical details. We consider the placement of the purse string suture as a critical factor in the outcome of the patients. We find that some amount of the muscle fibers would invariably be involved in the resected specimen, without any significant impact in the clinical outcome or in the quality of life improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL, Bokey EL, CHilds PA, Roberts AK, Waxman BP, Maddern GJ (2002) A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1395–1406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for hemorrhoids versus Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C, Carriero A, Milito G, Dodi G, Ma scagni D, Orsini S, Pietroletti R, Ripetti V, Tagariello GB (2002) Complications after stapled haemorroidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong LY, Jiang JK, Chang SC, Lin JK (2003) Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:116–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eypasch E, Williams J, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmülling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the sixth world congress of endoscopic surgery, Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, p.777–784

  7. Fazio VW (2000) Early promise of stapling technique for haemorroidectomy. Lancet 355:768–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roswell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorroidectomy) versus conventional haemorroidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seow-Cohen F (2001) Stapled haemorroidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg 88:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorroidectomy operations. Br. J.Surg 93:226–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Corman ML, Gravié JF, Hager T, Loudon MA, Mascagni D, Nystrom PO, Seow-Choen F, Abcarian H, Marcello P, Weiss E (2003) Longo A: Stapled haemorroidipexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party-indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal dis 5:304–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kam MH, Mathur P, Peng XH, Seow-Choen Chew WC, Kumarasinghe MP (2005) Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1437–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohana G, Myslovaty B, Ariche A, Dreznik Z, Koren R, Rath-Wolfson L (2007) World J Surg 31:1336–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plocek MD, Kondylis LA, Duhan-Floyd N, Reilly JC, Geisler DP, Kondylis PD (2006) Dis Colon Rectum 49:1905–1909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Duque-Lopez X, Miranda-Gomez A, Pichardo-Bahena R, Mendez M, Moran S (2003) Prospective study of factors affecting postoperative pain and symptoms persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids: a need for preservation of squamous epithelium. Dis Colon Rectum 46:955–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raahave D, Jepsen LV, Pedersen IK (2008) Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow up to five years. Dis Colon Rectum 3:334–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF et al (2008) Results, outcome predictors and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 2:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacopo Martellucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calomino, N., Martellucci, J., Fontani, A. et al. Care with regard to details improves the outcome of Longo mucoprolapsectomy: long term follow up. Updates Surg 63, 151–154 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-011-0077-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-011-0077-4

Keywords

Navigation