Abstract
This paper experimentally determines the stress on the central structural element of a sandwich structure made of two types of truss model: core-filled model and core-spaced model. The sandwich board is fabricated by casting AC4C aluminum alloy. From the experimental results of the three-point mechanical bending and conventional theoretical methods, the stress range of core-filled model was 28.4 to 30.68 MPa and of core-spaced model was 30.71 to 33.17 MPa for the sandwich core structure. Our results validate the use of these models in future research on lightweight structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- δ:
-
The elastic deflection of the indenters on the top face relative to on the bottom face
- l :
-
The span between the outer supports
- b:
-
A sandwich beam of uniform width
- c:
-
Perfectly bonded to a metallic foam core of thickness
- d:
-
The spacing of the mid-planes of the face-sheets
- t:
-
The face sheet of thickness
- y:
-
The distance from the neutral axis
- σf :
-
The longitudinal bending stresses in the face
- σc :
-
The longitudinal bending stresses in the core
- A:
-
The cross-sectional area
- E:
-
The Young’s modulus
- Ec :
-
The Young’s modulus for the core
- Ef :
-
The Young’s modulus for the face-sheet
- F:
-
The total load applied to the beam
- G:
-
The shear modulus
- Gc :
-
The shear modulus of the core
- (AG)eq :
-
The equivalent shear rigidity
- (EI)eq :
-
The equivalent flexural rigidity
- M:
-
The moment at the cross-section of interest
References
Allen, H. G. (1969). Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels. Pergamon Press.
Ashby, M. F., Evans, A., Fleck, N. A., Gibson, L. J., Hutchinson, J. W., & Wadley, H. N. G. (2000). Metal foams—A design guide. Butterworth Heinemann.
Broeng, J., Barkou, S. E., Bjarklev, A., Knight, J. C., Birks, T. A., & Russell, P. S. J. (1998). Highly increased photonic band gaps in silica/air structures. Optics Communications, 156(4–6), 240–244.
Cheng, Y. C., Yeh, H. C., & Lee, C. K. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of the honeycomb core in a honeycomb structure using uniform design and grey relational analysis. Engineering Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2020.1862825
Choi, J. (2019). Research of Mechanical Characterization for Hypercube Model created by 3D Printing Technique. In 11th International Conference on Porous Metals and Metallic Foams, Dearborn, USA, August 20–23.
Elzayady, N., & Elghandour, E. (2021). Design optimization to improve the performance of the aircraft composite structures. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 35(10), 4381–4388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0909-1
Gadkaree, K. P. (1998). Carbon honeycomb structures for adsorption applications. Carbon, 36(7–8), 981–989.
Gibson, L. J., Ashby, M. F., & Harley, B. A. (2010). Cellular materials in nature and medicine. Cambridge University Press.
Gribniak, V. (2021). Advanced Composite: From Materials Characterization to Structural Application, MDPI, ISBN 978–3–0365–0724–8.
Hao, J., Wu, X., Oporto, G., Liu, W., & Wang, J. (2020). Structural analysis and strength-to-weight optimization of wood-based sandwich composite with honeycomb core under three-point flexural test. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 78(6), 1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01574-1
Hexweb™ Honeycomb Attributes and Properties" (PDF). (2006). Hexcel Composites. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010–06–01. Retrieved 2006–09–21.
Instron Product Accessories Extensometer catalogue. (2021). (https://www.instron.us/en-us/products/testing-accessories/extensometers/non-contacting-video).
Krishnapillai, S., Velmurugan R., & Ha, S. K. (2021). Composite Materials for Extreme Loading. In Proceedings of the Indo-Korean workshop on Multi Functional Materials for Extreme Loading 2021, Springer, ISBN 978-981-16-4137-4.
Masuda, H., & Fukuda, K. (1995). Ordered metal nanohole arrays made by a two-step replication of honeycomb structures of anodic alumina. Science, 268(5216), 1466–1468.
Pandey, C., Goyat, V., & Goel, S. (2021). Advances in materials and mechanical engineering: Select proceedings of ICFTMME 2020 - Lecture notes in mechanical engineering, Springer.
Saran, V. H., & Misra, R. K. (2019). Advances in Systems Engineering. In Select Proceedings of NSC 2019, Springer, ISBN 978-981-15-8024-6.
Shifa, M., Tariq, F., & Chandio, A. D. (2021). Mechanical and electrical properties of hybrid honeycomb sandwich structure for spacecraft structural applications. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 23(1), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636219830783
Smardzewski, J., Maslej, M., & Wojciechowski, K. W. (2021). Compression and low velocity impact response of wood-based sandwich panels with auxetic lattice core. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 79, 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-021-01677-3(2021)
Squibb, C., & Philen, M. (2022). Effective in-plane elastic properies of honeycomb-polymer composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 56(4), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983211054782
Wang, L., & Liu, H. T. (2021). Parameter optimization of bidirectional re-entrant auxetic honeycomb metamaterial based on genetic algorithm. Composite Structures, 2021(267), 113915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113915
Wang, N., & Deng, Q. (2021). Effect of axial deformation on elastic properties of irregular honeycomb structure. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 34, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-021-00574-3
Wang, S., Liu, L., Huang, Z., Li, Z., Liu, J., & Hao, Y. (2021). (2021): Honeycomb structure is promising for the repair of human bone defects. Materials & Design, 207, 109832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109832
Yabu, H., Takebayashi, M., Tanaka, M., & Shimomura, M. (2005). Superhydrophobic and lipophobic properties of self-organized honeycomb and pincushion structures. Langmuir, 21(8), 3235–3323.
Zhong, R., Ren, X., Zhang, X. Y., Luo, C., Zhang, Y., & Xie, Y. M. (2022). Mechanical properties of concrete composites with auxetic single and layered honeycomb structures. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126453
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding was provided by ministry of education, (Grant No. 2018R1D1A1B07041383).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, J. Mechanical Characterisation of Truss Models by Three-Point Bending Test. Int J Steel Struct 23, 331–344 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00731-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00731-5