Abstract
Steel structures are among the building systems extensively used in most countries. They have been the subject of numerous studies with the aim of optimizing their performance under vertical and lateral loads. One important issue in this regard is reparability of connection areas under severe earthquakes, i.e., developing connections easy to be restored to their initial state. In this paper a passive control system recently developed by the authors is studied further and enhanced in configuration and behavior. The developed system is a repairable part of the connection zone in a steel moment frame absorbing the seismic damage and producing hysteretic damping. This damper is a rubber-steel core added beneath the beam-to-column connection. The steel bolts core provide for the hysteretic damping and the rubber layer contributes the restoring force. Results of several cyclic tests by varying different parameters of the damper are presented and discussed in this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASTM E8-04. (2004). Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 3.
ATC-24. (1992). “Guidelines for Cyclic Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures for Buildings.” Report No. ATC-24, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
Banisheikholeslami, A,. Behnamfar, F,. Ghandil, M. (2016). “A beam-to-column connection with visco-elastic and hysteretic dampers for seismic damage control.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, pp. 185–195.
Bemnamfar, F. and Soltanabadi, R. (2017). “Analytical studies on a combined rubber-steel damper for repairable steel moment connections.” Submitted. Journal of Earthquake Engineering.
Castiglioni, C. A., Kanyilmaz, A., and Calado, L. (2012). “Experimental analysis of seismic resistant composite steel frames with dissipative devices.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 76, pp. 1–12.
Khoo, H., Clifton, G., Butterworth, J., and MacRae, G. (2012) “Developments on the Sliding Hinge Joint”. Proc. 15WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Kishiki, S., Yamada, S., Suzuki, K., Saeki, E., and Wada, A. (2006). “New Ductile Moment-Resisting Connections Limiting Damage to Specific Elements at the Bottom Flange.” Proc. 8th USNational Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper No. 852.
Koetaka, Y., Chusilp, P., Zhang, Z., Ando, M., Suita, K., Inoue, K., and Uno, N. (2005). “Mechanical property of beam-to-column moment connection with hysteretic dampers for column weak axis.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 27, pp. 109–117.
Lim, B. and Matsumoto, T. (2006). “Characteristics of super high damping visco-elastic damper for earthquake and wind-induced vibration.” Proc. 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
Maleki, S., and Mahjoubi, S. (2014) “Infilled-pipe damper.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 96, pp. 45–58.
Mander, T. J., Rodgers, G. W., Chase, J. G., Mander, J. B., MacRae, G. A., and Dhakal, R. P. (2009). “Damage avoidance design steel beam-column moment connection using high-force-to-volume dissipators.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 135, pp. 1390–1397.
Oh, S.H., Kim, Y.J., and Ryu, H.S. (2009). “Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 31, pp. 1997–2008.
Rofooei, F. and Farhidzadeh, A. (2011). “Investigation on the seismic behavior of steel MRF with shape memory alloy equipped connections.” Procedia Engineering, Vol. 14, pp. 3325–3330.
Smith, B. S, and Alex, C. (1991). Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design. University of Texas Press.
Speicher, M. S., DesRoches, R., and Leon, R. T. (2011). “Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 33, pp. 2448–2457.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soltanabadi, R., Behnamfar, F. Experimental Studies on a Combined Damper for Repairable Steel Moment Connections. Int J Steel Struct 18, 211–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0317-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0317-2