Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Effect of End-Connection Specifications on Lateral Bearing Capacity of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concentrically braced steel frames should be capable of bearing considerable amounts of lateral force. The connection of these frames to beams and columns plays an important role in this respect. This connection is designed to either prevent end-connection problems caused by free buckling of a member or reinforce the gusset plate to reduce damages caused by possible buckling of a member at the connection. In order to assess seismic and buckling behaviors of braces under different conditions, 8 single-span one-story frames with diagonal braces were studied using a finite-element software. The first two models were implemented to assess the impact of end clearance, while the other six models were used to study the effects of different stiffeners on the gusset plates. Results showed that, proper incorporation of stiffeners can prevent early failure of the gusset plate connection and enhance post-buckling behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alipour, M, and Aghakouchak AA. 2013. “Numerical Analysis of the Nonlinear Performance of Concentrically Braced Frames under Cyclic Loading.” International Journal of Steel Structures 13(3), pp. 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/AISC 360-10. 2010. American Institute of Steel Construction Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago-Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astaneh-Asl, Abolhassan, Subhash C Goel, and Robert D Hanson. 1985. “Cyclic out-of-Plane Buckling of Double-Angle Bracing.” Journal of structural Engineering, 111(5), pp. 1135–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astaneh, ABOLHASSAN, Subhash C Goel, and Robert D Hanson. 1986. “Earthquake-Resistant Design of Double-Angle Bracings.” Engineering Journal, 23(4).

  • Bjorhovde, Reidar. 1988. “Limit States Design Considerations for Gusset Plates.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 9(1), pp. 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorhovde, Reidar, and KChakrabarti S. 1985. “Tests of Full-Size Gusset Plate Connections.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 111(3), pp. 667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Sheng-Jin, and Ching-Chang Chang.2012. “Experimental Study of Low Yield Point Steel Gusset Plate Connections.” Thin-Walled Structures, 57, pp. 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EN 1993-1-1. 2005. 1 European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, Dawn E et al.2008. “Improved Seismic Performance of Gusset Plate Connections.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(6), pp. 890–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, Dawn E, and Charles W Roeder. 2008. “Improved Seismic Design of Concentrically Braced Frames and Gusset Plate Connections.” In Proceeding of the 2008 Structures Congress,.

    Google Scholar 

  • N Sheng, C H Yam, and V P Iu. 2002. “Analytical Investigation and the Design of the Compressive Strength of Steel Gusset Plate Connections.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 58(11), pp. 1473–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simulia, DS. 2013. Dassault Systems, Providence, RIABAQUS 6.13 User’s Manual. Dassault Systems, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, William A. 1984. “Bracing Connections for Heavy Construction.” Engineering Journal, AISC 21(3), pp. 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uang, Chia-Ming, Michel Bruneau, Andrew S Whittaker, and Key-Chyuan Tsai. 2001. “Seismic Design of Steel Structures.” In The Seismic Design Handbook, Springer, pp. 409–462.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, Richard E. 1952. Experimental Investigation of Stresses in Gusset Plates. Engineering Experiment Station, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • KK Wijesundara, GA Rassati, R Nascimbene, and D Bolognini. 2010. “Seismic Performance of Brace-Beam-Column Connections in Concentrically Braced Frames.” Struct Congr 2010, pp. 930–942.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Jung-Han, Dawn E Lehman, and Charles W Roeder. 2008. “Influence of Connection Design Parameters on the Seismic Performance of Braced Frames.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64(6), pp. 607–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Jung-Han, Charles W Roeder, and Dawn E Lehman. 2008. “Analytical Performance Simulation of Special Concentrically Braced Frames.” Journal of Structural Engineering 134(6), pp. 881–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mussa Mahmoudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmoudi, M., Mehrizi, A.Z. & Shirpour, A. Evaluation of the Effect of End-Connection Specifications on Lateral Bearing Capacity of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames. Int J Steel Struct 18, 179–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0314-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0314-5

Keywords

Navigation