Abstract
In this paper a new eccentric and knee bracing system named Eccentrically Knee Brace (EKB) is introduced and its merits to increase seismic performance of the steel frames is investigated. To assess the seismic behavior of this system compared to other steel braced systems, numerical modeling using finite element software is implemented. Subjected to moderate earthquakes, the knee element exclusively dissipates the seismic energy through plastic shear distortion, while the other structural elements remain in elastic range. Under severe earthquakes, plastic deformation of the knee element will be halted by the stopper subsequently causing yielding of the link element. Finally, a simplified analytical model is derived to predict the bilinear behavior of the EKBs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANSYS 5.4 (1992) reference manual. Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc.
Aristizabal-ochoa JD.(1986). “Disposable knee bracing: improvement in seismic design of steel frames”. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 112(7), pp. 1544–1552.
ATC. (1992). Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures for buildings. Rep. No. ATC-24. Redwood City, Calif: Applied Technology Council.
B. Hosseini Hashemi and M. Alirezaei. (2016). “Experimental studies into the seismic behavior of eccentrically knee braced frames subjected to lateral loadings”. submitted to journal of Engineering Structures.
Balendra T, Sam MT, Liaw CY. (1990). “Diagonal brace with ductile anchor for a seismic steel frame”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19, pp. 847–858.
Balendra T, Sam MT, Liaw CY. (1991). “Preliminary studies into the behavior of knee braced frames subjected to seismic loading”. Engineering Structures, 13(1), pp. 67–74.
Englekirk, R. (1994). Steel structures. Controlling behavior through design. Wiley, New York, pp. 481–484.
F. Nateghi-Alahi, M. Khazaei-Poul. (2012). “Experimental study of steel plate shear walls with infill plates strengthened by GFRP laminates”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 78, 159–172.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA-274 (1997), NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings [Washington, DC].
Fell, B.V., Kanwinde, A.M., Deierlein, G.G., Myers, A.T., and Fu, X. (2006). Buckling and Fracture of Concentric Braces under Inelastic Cyclic Loading. Steel Tips. Structural Steel Education Council, Moraga, CA.
FEMA 350, 2000, Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
FEMA 356, (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
H.-L. Hsu, J.-L. Juang and C.-H. Chou (2011). “Experimental evaluation on the seismic performance of steel knee braced frame structures with energy dissipation mechanism”. Journal of Steel and Composite Structures, 11(1), pp. 77–91.
Hjelmstad KD, Popov EP. (1983). “Seismic behavior of active beam link in eccentrically braced frames”. EERC Report No. 83-15, Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
Hjelmstad KD, Popov EP. (1983). “Cyclic behavior and design of link beams”. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 109(10), pp. 2387–2403.
Jeffrey Ger and Franklin Y. Cheng (2012). Seismic design aids for nonlinear pushover analysis of reinforced concrete and steel bridges, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Kasai K, Popov EP. (1986). “General behavior of WFsteel shear link beams”. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 112(2), pp. 362–382.
Krawinkler, H. (1978). Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames, Eng. J., AISC, 3(15), pp. 82–91.
Lee, K. and Bruneau, M. (2005). “Energy dissipation demand of compression members in concentrically braced frames, Steel”. Compos. Struct, Int. J., 5(5), pp. 345–358.
M. Mofid, M. Lotfollahi. (2006). “On the characteristics of new ductile knee bracing systems”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(3), pp. 271–281.
Mojtaba Farahi, Massood Mofid. (2013). “On the quantification of seismic performance factors of Chevron Knee Bracings, in steel structures”. J Engineering Structures, 46, pp. 155–164.
Okazaki T, Engelhardt MD, Drolias A, Schell E, Hong JK, Uang CM. (2009). “Experimental investigation of link-tocolumn connections in eccentrically braced frames”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, pp. 1401–1412.
Paul W. Richards. (2010). “Estimating the Stiffness of Eccentrically Braced Frames”. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 15(1), pp. 91–95.
Popov EP, Engelhardt MD (1988b). “Seismic eccentrically braced frames”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 10, pp. 321–354.
Richards PW, Uang CM. (2005). “Effect of flange width thickness ratio on eccentrically braced frames link cyclic rotation capacity”. J Struct Eng, 131(10), pp. 1546–1552.
Roeder CW, Popov EP. (1978) “Eccentrically braced steel frames for earthquakes”. ASCE Journal of Structural Division, 104(3), pp. 391–412.
S. Antoniou, R. Pinho. (2004). “Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(5), pp. 643–661.
Seyed Mehdi Zahrai and Meysam Jalali. (2014). “Experimental and analytical investigations on seismic behavior of ductile steel knee braced frames”, Steel and Composite Structures, 16(1), pp. 1–21.
Seyed Mehdi Zahrai, Milad Pirdavari, Hamid Momeni Farahani. (2013). “Evaluation of hysteretic behavior of eccentrically braced frames with zipper-strut upgrade”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 83, pp. 10–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hashemi, B.H., Alirezaei, M. On the Evaluation of the Use of EKBs to Improve Seismic Performance of Steel Frames. Int J Steel Struct 18, 25–37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0303-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0303-8