Skip to main content
Log in

Fatigue life assessment for a composite box girder bridge

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 31 March 2015

Abstract

Two conventional methods, the nominal stress method and the hot spot stress method, are examined for the fatigue assessment of a steel box girder bridge while considering the effect of the modeling options on the estimated fatigue life. Two analytical models, a simplified global analytical model and a refined local finite element analytical model, are developed for the evaluation of the stress ranges induced by a fatigue truck. The field tests are conducted for validating the analytical models as well as for direct fatigue assessment via an ambient vibration test. The local modeling options that are examined are the inclusion of the fillet weld itself in the refined analytical model and the mitigation of the concentrated stress at the web plate, considering stress dispersion over the width of the attachment. The fatigue life is estimated for three different nonexceedance probabilities, considering different partial factors according to the accuracy of the analysis method as well as the reliability of the estimated fatigue loading for a specific bridge site. Through a comparative analysis, the potential differences in estimated fatigue lives according to the assessment methods and the modeling options are quantitatively discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO (2007). AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications. 4th ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • AASHTO (2011). The manual for bridge evaluation. 2nd ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ABAQUS (2010). ABAQUS user’s manual 6.10. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aygül, M., Al-Emrani, M., and Urushadze, S. (2012). “Modelling and fatigue life assessment of orthotropic bridge deck details using FEM.” International Journal of Fatigue, 40, pp. 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, T. J., Kim, T. S., Kyung, K. S., and Hwang, Y. K. (2010). “Fatigue reliability analysis for the crack propagation compared with LRFD specification.” International Journal of Steel Structures, 10(1), pp. 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, S. D., and Socie, D. F. (1982). “Simple Rainflow Counting Algorithms.” International Journal of Fatigue, 4(1), pp. 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbacher, A. F. (2008). Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. The international Institute of Welding, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbacher, A. F. (2009). “The new IIW recommendations for fatigue assessment of welded joints and components — A comprehensive code recently updated.” International Journal of Fatigue, 31(1), pp. 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. J., Kim, H. K., and Park, J. Y. (2013). “Reliabilitybased evaluation of load carrying capacity for a composite box girder bridge.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(3), pp. 575–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K., and Frangopol, D. M. (2010). “Bridge fatigue reliability assessment using probability density functions of equivalent stress range based on field monitoring data.” International Journal of Fatigue, 32(8), pp. 1221–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R., Liu, Y., Ji, B., Wang, M., and Tian, Y. (2014). “Hot spot stress analysis on rib-deck welded joint in orthotropic steel decks.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 97, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, M. A. (1945). “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12(3), pp. 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • MLTM (2012). Koran Bridge Design Code (Limit state design method). Korea Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs, Seoul, Korea (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, E., Fricke, W., and Maddox, S. J. (2006). Fatigue analysis of welded components: Designer’s guide to the structural hot-spot stress approach. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahrapeyma, A., Hosseini, A., and Marefat, M. S. (2013). “Life-cycle prediction of steel bridges using reliabilitybased fatigue deterioration profile: case study of Neka Bridge.” International Journal of Steel Structures, 13(2), pp. 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAP2000 (1995). Static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures nonlinear version 7.4. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, X. W., Ni, Y. Q., Wong, K. Y., and Ko, J. M. (2012). “Statistical analysis of stress spectra for fatigue life assessment of steel bridges with structural health monitoring data.” Engineering Structures, 45, pp. 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. E. (2006). “Assessment of bridge remaining fatigue life through field strain measurement.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 11(6), pp. 737–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ho-Kyung Kim.

Additional information

Discussion open until May 1, 2015. This manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on May 6, 2014; approved on December 1, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.Y., Kim, HK. Fatigue life assessment for a composite box girder bridge. Int J Steel Struct 14, 843–853 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1215-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1215-x

Keywords

Navigation