Skip to main content
Log in

Performance testing and comparison of buckling-restrained braces with H and crisscross cross section unrestrained segments

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) deliver ductile, stable, and repeatable hysteretic behavior. The plastic deformation capacity of the BRBs indicates the good indexes both in terms of ultimate deformation and in terms of energy dissipation capacity. In this paper, the load-carrying elements of BRBs were fabricated with steel (Chinese Q235), and four layers of plastic film (0.2 mm in thickness) were used as unbounded materials to prevent the buckling of inner cores in higher modes and provide spaces to facilitate its lateral expansion in case of compression. The differences of ultimate compression and tension loads were controlled in a small range. The transformation of the unrestrained segment’s section from crisscross shape to H shape can significantly improve the moment-resistance capacity of the unrestrained segment, avoiding buckling instability effectively due to evident moment stiffness enhancement. The experimental results of pseudo-static tests (PSTs) under cyclic load indicate: BRB with H cross section unrestrained segments can undergo fully-reversed axial yield cycles without loss of stiffness or strength, which have large ductility and superior seismic energy dissipation ability. There is obvious strain intensification in tension and compression phases. But there is evident decreasing of stiffness and strength on BRB with crisscross section unrestrained segments due to the buckling of unrestrained segment under compression, the ductility and energy dissipation ability decline distinctly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, C. J., Makris N. and Aiken I. D. (2004). “Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 130(6), pp. 880–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Chen, S. Y., and Liaw, J. J. (2001). “Application of low yield strength steel on controlled plastification ductile concentrically braced frames.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(5), pp. 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. C. and Chen, S. Y. (2010). “Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched bucklingrestrained braces.” Engineering Structures, 32(8), pp. 2108–2121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusicka, P. and Tinker, J. (2013). “Global restraint in ultralightweight buckling-restrained braces.” Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(1), pp. 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryasar, M. E. and Topkaya, C. (2010). “An experimental study on steel-encased buckling-restrained brace hysteretic dampers.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(5), pp. 561–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • GB 50011-2010 (2010). Code for seismic design of buildings. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • GB 50017-2003 (2006). Code for design of steel structures. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genna, F. and Gelfi, P. (2012). “Analysis of the lateral thrust in bolted steel buckling-restrained braces. I: Experimental and numerical results.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 138(10), pp. 1231–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheidi, A., Mirtaheri, M., Zandi, A. P., and Alanjari, P. (2011). “Effect of filler material on local and global behaviour of buckling-restrained braces.” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Building, 32(8), pp. 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoveidae, N. and Rafezy, B. (2012). “Overall buckling behavior of all-steel buckling restrained braces.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 79, pp. 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, M. and Murai, M. (2006). “Buckling-restrained brace using steel mortar planks: performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(14), pp. 1807–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, M. M. and Lu, D. G., Sun L., and Zhang S. M. (2014). “Performance testing and cyclic behavior of buckling-restrained braces with H cross section unrestrained segments.” Advances in Structural Engineering, 17(5), pp. 677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, Y. K., Kim, M. H., Kim J., and Kim S. D. (2009). “Component tests of buckling-restrained braces with unconstrained length.” Engineering Structures, 31(2), pp. 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koetaka, Y., Narihara, H., and Tsujita, O. (2001). “Experimental study on buckling restrained braces.” Proc. Sixth Pacific Structural Steel Conference, Beijing, China, pp. 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J. W. and Tsai, K. C. (2004). “Research and application of buckling restrained braces in Taiwan.” Proc. ANGER Annual Meeting, Hawaii, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, S., Uang C. M., and Benzoni G. (2003). Subassemblage testing of corebace buckling restrained braces, Technical Report of Department of Structural Engineering. Report No. TR- 2003/01, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. J., Fahnestock, L. A., and Eatherton, M. R. (2011). “Self-centering buckling- restrained braces for advanced seismic performance.” Proc. Structures Congress, ASCE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 960–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. J., Fahnestock, L. A., and Eatherton, M. R. (2012). “Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy self-centering bucklingrestrained brace.” Engineering Structures, 40, pp. 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., López, A. F., Cahís, X., and Crisafulli, F. (2009). “A low-tech dissipative buckling restrained brace. Design, analysis, production and testing.” Engineering Structures, 31(9), pp. 2152–2161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, T., Hajjar, J. F., Matsui, R., Nishimoto, K., and Aiken, I. D. (2010). “Local buckling restraint condition for core plates in buckling restrained braces.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(2), pp. 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, T., Hajjar, J. F., Matsui, R., Nishimoto, K., and Aiken, I. D. (2012a). “Effect of local buckling core plate restraint in buckling restrained braces.” Engineering Structures, 44, pp. 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, T., Hajjar, J. F., Matsui, R., Nishimoto, K., and Aiken, I. D. (2012b). “Effect of local buckling core plate restraint in buckling restrained braces.” Engineering Structures, 44, pp. 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R., Degrange, G., and Blouin, J. (1999). “Seismic rehabilitation of a four-story building with a stiffened bracing system.” Proc. Eighth Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 549–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. S., Chen, W. S., and Lin, Y. C. (2008). “Full scale shaking table tests of a steel structure with multi-curved buckling restrained braces.” Proc. Fourteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, Paper No. 05-06-0007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usami, T., Wang, C. L., and Funayama, J. (2012). “Developing high-performance aluminum alloy bucklingestrained braces based on series of low-cycle fatigue tests.” Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 41(4), pp. 643–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada, A., Connor, J., Kawai, H., Iwata, M., and Watanabe, A. (1992). “Damage tolerant structure.” Proc. Fifth U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Improvement of Structural Design and Construction Practices (ATC-15-4), Applied Technology Council, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., Usami, T., and Funayama, J. (2012). “Evaluating the influence of stoppers on the low-cycle fatigue properties of high-performance buckling-restrained braces.” Engineering Structures, 41, pp. 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., Usami, T., Funayama, J., and Imase, F. (2013). “Low-cycle fatigue testing of extruded aluminium alloy buckling-restrained braces.” Engineering Structures, 46, pp. 294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, A., Hitomi, Y., Saeki, E., Wada, A., and Fujimoto, M. (1988). “Properties of braces encased in buckling-restrained concrete and steel tube.” Proc. Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, Volume IV, pp. 719–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Q. (2005). “State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(6), pp. 727–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. X., Wu, B., and Ou, J. P. (2012a). “Flexural demand on pin-connected buckling-restrained braces and design recommendations.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 138(11), pp. 1398–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. X., Wu, B., and Ou, J. P. (2012b). “Effect of brace end rotation on the global buckling behavior of pinconnected buckling-restrained braces with end collars.” Engineering Structures, 40, pp. 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingming Jia.

Additional information

Discussion open until May 1, 2015. This manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on March 3, 2014; approved on December 1, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, M., Guo, L. & Lu, D. Performance testing and comparison of buckling-restrained braces with H and crisscross cross section unrestrained segments. Int J Steel Struct 14, 745–753 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1206-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1206-y

Keywords

Navigation