Abstract
The double split tee connection is a form of connection suitable for ordinary or special moment frames. This double split tee connection represents different behavioral characteristics and failure modes depending on the stiffness ratio of the beams and columns, the geometric shape of the T-stub and the panel zone effect. In general, the geometric shape of the T-stub and its effects can be classified by the parameter α representing the value of the ratio between the moment at the centerline of the bolt line and the flange moment at the face of the T-stub stem. Energy dissipation capacity, however, can be improved by applying materials that facilitate the expression of seismic performance, as with the double split tee connection, which has a relatively small α value. In this regard, this study attempted to investigate the changes in energy dissipation capacity by applying the shape memory alloy (SMA), which provides excellent shape memory capability and ability to restore superelasticity to the double split tee connection having relatively small α value. Specimens of the double split tee connection fastened using SMA bolts were fabricated, and an experiment on the connections was performed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abolmaali, A., Treadway, J., Aswath, P., Flank k I., and McCarthy, E. (2006). “Hysteresis behavior of t-stub connections with superelastic shape memory fasteners.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62, pp. 831–838.
Astaneh, A. (1985). “Procedure for design and analysis of hanger-type connections.” Engineering Journal, 22(2), pp. 63–66.
Auricchio, F. and Sacco, E. (1997). “A one-dimensional model for superelastic shape-memory alloys with different elastic properties between austenite and martensite.” Int., J. Non-Linear Mech., 32, pp. 1101–1114.
Auricchio, F. and Taylor, R. L., and Lubliner, J. (1997). “Shape-memory alloy:Macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 146, pp. 281–312.
Boyd, J. G. and Lagoudas, D. C. (1996). “A thermodynamical constitutive model for shape memory materials. Part I: The monolithic shape memory alloy.” International Journal of Plasticity, 12(6), pp. 805–842.
DesRoches, R., McCormick, J., and Delemont, M. (2004). “Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars.” Journal of Structual Engineering, 13(1), pp. 38–46.
Kulak, G. L., Fisher, J. W., and Struik, J. H. A. (2001). Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted joints. 2nd Ed., American Institute of Steel Construction, Wiley, New York.
Liang, C. and Rogers, C. A. (1990). “One-dimensional thermomechanical constitutive relations for shape memory materials.” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1, pp. 207–234.
Liang, C. and Rogers, C. A. (1992). “A multi-dimensional constitutive model for shape memory alloys.” Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 26, pp. 429–443.
Speicher, M. S., DesRohes, R., and Leon, R. (2011). “Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection.” Engineering Structures, 33, pp. 2448–2456.
Tamai, H. and Kitagawa, Y. (2002). “Pseudoelastic behavior of shape memory alloy wire and its application to seismic resistance member for building.” Computational Materials Science, 25, pp. 218–227.
Tanaka, K. (1986). “A thermomechanical sketch of shape memory effect: One-dimensional tensile behavior.” Res Mechanica, 18, pp. 251–263.
Thornton, W. A. (1985). “Prying Action: A general treatment.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 22, pp. 67–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Discussion open until May 1, 2015. This manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on February 27, 2014; approved on December 1, 2014.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, JG., Kim, JW. & Lee, HD. Experimental tests for the evaluation of the energy dissipation capacity of a double split tee connection with SMA bolts. Int J Steel Struct 14, 723–730 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1204-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1204-0