Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic assessment of structural seismic performance influenced by the characteristics of hysteretic energy dissipating devices

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seismic performance of a structure with hysteretic energy dissipation devices (HEDDs) is significantly influenced by their cyclic structural characteristics. This is due to the fact that the acceleration and displacement responses of the structure mainly depend on the dissipating capacities of HEDDs. Hence, it is important to verify the cyclic characteristics of the HEDDs in designing the structure. Recognizing this importance, a current ASCE/SEI 7 requires prototype tests of energy dissipating systems that consist of HEDDs and their connecting components with a seismic-force-resisting system. The codified requirements for the prototype tests prescribe the acceptance criteria of energy dissipating systems, so called as a 15 percent rule. However, there is little information on the reliability of such acceptance criteria. As a part of research efforts to figure out this problem, this paper carries out sensitivity analysis of the seismic responses of steel moment-resisting frames influenced by the cyclic characteristics of damping systems employing HEDDs. Throughout the sensitivity analyses using probabilistic approaches, this study numerically assesses the influence of HEDD’s cyclic characteristics on the seismic response of steel moment-resisting frames. The analysis results show that the change of HEDD’s design parameters significantly affects the seismic response and of the HEDD’s design parameters, the initial stiffness and yield strength are the most influential parameters. Furthermore, the variation of the important structural engineering parameters is similar to or smaller than 10% of their mean values if all design parameters of HEDDs are satisfied with the prototype testing requirements prescribed in ASCE/SEI 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE/SEI 7 (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. J. (1998). User’s manual of RUAUMOKO, the Maori god of Volcanoes and earthquakes. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, A. K. (2012). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssanthopoulos, M. K., Dymiotis, C., and Kappos, A. J. (2000). “Probabilistic evaluation of behavior factors in EC8-designed R/C frames.” Engineering Structures, 22(8), pp. 1028–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enrico, Z. (2013). The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis. Springer, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-356 (2000). Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-P695 (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangopol, D. M., Ide, Y., Spacone, E., and Iwaki, I. (1996). “A new look at reliability of reinforced concrete columns.” Structural Safety, 18(2), pp. 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobarah, A. and Aly, N. M. (1998). “Seismic reliability assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2(4), pp. 569–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. D., Xia, C., and Su, Y. F. (1992). “Design of supplemental steel damping devices for building.” Proc. Tenth World Conference Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. R., Park, J. H., and Lee, T. H. (2011). “Sensitivity analysis of steel buildings subjected to column loss.” Engineering Structure, 33(2), pp. 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H. and Mosalam, K. M. (2006). Probabilistic seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structural components and systems. PEER Technical Report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H. and Mosalam, K. M. (2009). “Identifying significant components of structures for seismic performance using FOSM method.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 13(4), pp. 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otani, S. (1981). “Hysteresis models of reinforced concrete for earthquake response analysis.” Journal of Faculty of Engineering, 36(2), pp. 125–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo, J. A., Midorikawa, M., and Asari, T. (2010). “Earthquake response of ten-story-drift-controlled reinforced concrete frames with hysteretic dampers.” Engineering Structures, 32, pp. 1735–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., and Shaikhutdinov, R. V. (2002). “Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables.” Earthquake Spectra, 18(4), pp. 719–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. H. and Allahabadi, R. (1988). “Seismic damage prediction by deterministic methods: Concepts and procedures.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 16(5), pp. 719–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, O. M., Constantinou, M. C., Kircher, C. A., Whittaker, A. S., Johnson, M. W., Gomez, J. D., and Chrysostomou, C. Z. (2000). Development and evaluation of simplified procedures for analysis and design of buildings with passive energy dissipation systems. Report No. MCEER 00-0010, Revision 1, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, N.Y., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, L. (1990). Earthquake Hazard Analysis. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinghal, A. and Kiremidjian, A. (1996). “Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage.” Journal of Structure Engineering, ASCE, 122(12), pp. 1459–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka, M. (1972). “Probabilistic modeling of concrete structure.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 98(6), pp. 1433–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. C., Cheng, H. W., Hong, C. P., and Su, Y. F. (1993). “Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction.” Earthquake Spectra, 9(3), pp. 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, C. and Hanson, R. D. (1992). “Influence of ADAS element parameters on building seismic response.” Journal of Structural Engineering, 118(7), pp. 1903–1918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung-Joon Kim.

Additional information

Discussion open until May 1, 2015. This manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on February 24, 2014; approved on December 1, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, DH., Kim, HJ. Probabilistic assessment of structural seismic performance influenced by the characteristics of hysteretic energy dissipating devices. Int J Steel Struct 14, 697–710 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1202-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1202-2

Keywords

Navigation