Abstract
Addressing the ‘wicked problem’ of nutrient pollution requires coordinated policies spanning across diverse sectors and environmental systems. Using a case study of Canadian legislation, we apply semantic network analysis to identify thematic links across an inventory of 245 nutrient-related policies. Our analysis identifies twelve topics with unique types of connections across multiple facets of Canadian society. ‘Hub’ policies include broad environmental protection, land use planning, and climate-related legislation with close ties to multiple other topics. ‘Bridge’ policies create connections among otherwise disconnected topics in the network, representing opportunities to inform new policy proposals. Some legislation, such as food processing regulations, indirectly relates to nutrient use but could inform policy integration towards more coordinated and holistic nutrient management across the food system. A computational text network approach can be useful for addressing challenges in complex policy analysis, including by identifying unique entry points to guide more cross-cutting nutrient policy development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Ahlström, H., and S.E. Cornell. 2018. Governance, polycentricity and the global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. Environmental Science and Policy 79: 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.005.
Bail, C.A. 2016. Combining natural language processing and network analysis to examine how advocacy organizations stimulate conversation on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 11823–11828. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607151113.
Bayarsaikhan, T., M.-H. Kim, H.J. Oh, and T.-H.T. Gim. 2022. Toward sustainable development? Trend analysis of environmental policy in Korea from 1987 to 2040. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 66: 1640–1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2036602.
Biesbroek, R., S.J. Wright, S.K. Eguren, A. Bonotto, and I.N. Athanasiadis. 2022. Policy attention to climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: A global assessment of National Communications (1994–2019). Climate Policy 22: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.2018986.
Burt, R.S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787.
CBD. 2022. Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework. In Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD/COP/DEC/15/4. Retrieved 20 December, 2023, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-15/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf
Chiasson, D., J. Jaffart, O. Torres, and D.R. Kanter. 2022. Contribution pour une nouvelle gouvernance des algues vertes en Bretagne. Report from the SciencesPo École de Droit. Retrieved 20 December, 2023, from https://www.sciencespo.fr/ecole-de-droit/sites/sciencespo.fr.ecole-de-droit/files/Contribution_Algues%20vertes.pdf
DeFries, R., and H. Nagendra. 2017. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356: 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1950.
Drieger, P. 2013. Semantic network analysis as a method for visual text analytics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 79: 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.053.
Duffy, R.J., and J.J. Cook. 2019. Overcoming bureaucratic silos? Environmental policy integration in the Obama administration. Environmental Politics 28: 1192–1213.
Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19. 1990. Retrieved 23 June 2023 from https://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/stat/rso-1990-c-e19/latest/rso-1990-c-e19.html
Fariña García, M.C., V.L. De Nicolás De, J.L. Nicolás, Yagüe Blanco, and J.L. Fernández. 2021. Semantic network analysis of sustainable development goals to quantitatively measure their interactions. Environmental Development 37: 100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100589.
Galloway, J.N., and E.B. Cowling. 2021. Reflections on 200 years of Nitrogen, 20 years later. Ambio 50: 745–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01464-z.
Garske, B., and F. Ekardt. 2021. Economic policy instruments for sustainable phosphorus management: Taking into account climate and biodiversity targets. Environmental Sciences Europe 33: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00499-7.
Harder, R., M. Giampietro, and S. Smukler. 2021. Towards a circular nutrient economy. A novel way to analyze the circularity of nutrient flows in food systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 172: 105693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105693.
Hendrickson, M.K., and H.S. James. 2005. The Ethics of constrained choice: How the industrialization of agriculture impacts farming and farmer behavior. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18: 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0631-5.
Howlett, M., J. Vince, and P.D. RíoGonzález. 2017. Policy integration and multi-level governance: Dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs. Politics and Governance 5: 69–78. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i2.928.
Jordan, A., and A. Lenschow. 2010. Environmental policy integration: A state of the artreview. Environmental Policy and Governance 20: 147–158.
Kanter, D.R., F. Bartolini, S. Kugelberg, A. Leip, O. Oenema, and A. Uwizeye. 2019. Nitrogen pollution policy beyond the farm. Nature Food 1: 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0001-5.
Kanter, D.R., and W.J. Brownlie. 2019. Joint nitrogen and phosphorus management for sustainable development and climate goals. Environmental Science and Policy 92: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.020.
Kanter, D.R., O. Chodos, O. Nordland, M. Rutigliano, and W. Winiwarter. 2020. Gaps and opportunities in nitrogen pollution policies around the world. Nature Sustainability 3: 956–963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0577-7.
Keesstra, S.D., J. Bouma, J. Wallinga, P. Tittonell, P. Smith, A. Cerdà, L. Montanarella, J. Quinton, et al. 2016. Forum paper: The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). SOIL 2: 111–128. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-111-2016.
Kurze, K., and A. Lenschow. 2018. Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy-climate approach. Environmental Policy and Governance 28: 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1819.
Lade, S.J., W. Steffen, W. de Vries, S.R. Carpenter, J.F. Donges, D. Gerten, H. Hoff, T. Newbold, et al. 2020. Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions. Nature Sustainability 3: 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0454-4.
McCourt, S., and G.K. MacDonald. 2021. Provincial nitrogen footprints highlight variability in drivers of reactive nitrogen emissions in Canada. Environmental Research Letters 16: 095007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1e3b.
Meijers, E., and D. Stead. 2004. Policy integration: What does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review. In Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change: Greening of policies-interlinkages and policy integration.
Metson, G.S., G.K. MacDonald, A.M. Leach, J.E. Compton, J.A. Harrison, and J.N. Galloway. 2020. The U.S. consumer phosphorus footprint: Where do nitrogen and phosphorus diverge? Environmental Research Letters 15: 105022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba781.
Newman, M.E.J. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103.
Newman, M.E.J., and M. Girvan. 2004. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69: 026113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113.
Nilsson, M., T. Zamparutti, J.E. Petersen, B. Nykvist, P. Rudberg, and J. McGuinn. 2012. Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector–environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance 22: 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589.
Nowlin, M.C. 2016. Modeling issue definitions using quantitative text analysis. Policy Studies Journal 44: 309–331.
Nutrient Management Act, S.O. 2002, c. 4. 2002. Retrieved 23 June 2023 from https://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/stat/so-2002-c-4/latest/so-2002-c-4.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAXbnV0cmllbnQgbWFuYWdlbWVudCBhY3QAAAAAAQandresultIndex=1
Persson, Å., and H. Runhaar. 2018. Conclusion: Drawing lessons for environmental policy integration and prospects for future research. Environmental Science and Policy 85: 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.008.
Poulin, D. 2004. CanLII: How law societies and academia can make free access to the law a reality. Journal of Information Law and Technology 1: 13.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.
Ross, J.Z., and S. Omelon. 2018. Canada: Playing catch-up on phosphorus policy. FACETS 3: 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0105.
Schulte-Uebbing, L.F., A.H.W. Beusen, A.F. Bouwman, and W. De Vries. 2022. From planetary to regional boundaries for agricultural nitrogen pollution. Nature 610: 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05158-2.
Shim, J., C. Park, and M. Wilding. 2015. Identifying policy frames through semantic network analysis: An examination of nuclear energy policy across six countries. Policy Sciences 48: 51–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9211-3.
Shortle, J.S., J.R. Mihelcic, Q. Zhang, and M. Arabi. 2020. Nutrient control in water bodies: A systems approach. Journal of Environmental Quality 49: 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20022.
Tosun, J., and A. Lang. 2017. Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies 38: 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
Traag, V.A., L. Waltman, and N.J. van Eck. 2019. From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports 9: 5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z.
Weitz, N., H. Carlsen, M. Nilsson, and K. Skånberg. 2018. Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda. Sustainability Science 13: 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0470-0.
Yang, A.L., N. Raghuram, T.K. Adhya, S.D. Porter, A.N. Panda, H. Kaushik, A. Jayaweera, S.P. Nissanka, et al. 2022. Policies to combat nitrogen pollution in South Asia: Gaps and opportunities. Environmental Research Letters 17: 025007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac48b2.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Trottier Institute for Science and Public Policy (TISPP) at McGill University for funding via the Public Science Fellows Program. G.K.M.’s research program is also supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grants Program (RGPIN-2016-04920). The authors thank Gordon Hickey and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on earlier manuscript drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
McCourt, S., Kanter, D. & MacDonald, G.K. Identifying leverage points for sustainable nutrient policy integration in Canada. Ambio (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02004-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02004-9