Skip to main content

Danish pheasant and mallard hunters comply with the lead shot ban

Abstract

Denmark implemented a total ban on the use of lead shot for hunting and clay target shooting in 1996. Compliance was not studied systematically until recently. However, sporadic police checks and individual studies indicated that compliance was far from complete in the early years after regulation. To assess current levels of compliance with Danish regulations, we purchased 730 carcasses of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) and mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and a further 690 mallard gizzards were obtained from > 14 shooting events distributed across > 10 local authority districts throughout East and West Denmark in the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 hunting seasons. All carcasses and gizzards were subject to radiography and those that contained shot were examined, pellets removed by dissection and identified to shot type. In all, 3589 pellets (intact or fragmented) were found in 1420 carcasses/gizzards, of which 799 pellets (some fragmented) were identified. Among the sample of pheasants with embedded shot (N = 447), 1.8% (in 2016) and 2.2% (in 2017) were lead shot. Among 148 mallards in 2017 with embedded shot, 3.1% had lead shot. None of the 2017 mallard gizzards had embedded lead shot. We conclude that Danish pheasant and mallard shooters mostly comply with the lead shot regulations. Steel was the most used non-lead alternative. The majority of ingested shot was non-lead, indicating that lead shot is not generally available to pheasant and mallard and suggesting compliance with regulations in recent years/decades. The study showed that the possibility to predict the metal composition of shot pellets from X-ray images alone was highly inaccurate, confirming the necessity of necropsy to determine shot type.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Arnemo, J.M., O. Andersen, S. Stokke, V.G. Thomas, O. Krone, D.J. Pain, and R. Mateo. 2016. Health and environmental risks from lead-based ammunition: Science versus socio-politics. Eco-Health 13: 618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregnballe, T., T. Asferg, I. Clausager, H. Noer, P. Clausen and T.K. Christensen 2002. Vildtbestande, jagt og jagttider i Danmark—en biologisk vurdering af jagtens bæredygtighed som grundlag for jagttidsrevisionen 2003. Faglig Rapport fra DMU nr. 428. 225 pp.

  • Cromie, R.L., A. Loram, L. Hurst, M. O’Brien, J. Newth, M.J. Brown, and J.P. Harradine. 2010. Compliance with the environmental protection (Restrictions on Use of Lead Shot) (England) Regulations 1999, 2010. Bristol: Defra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromie, R., J. Newth, J. Reeves, M. O’Brien, K. Beckmann, and M. Brown. 2015. The sociological and political aspects of reducing lead poisoning from ammunition in the UK: why the transition to non-toxic ammunition is so difficult. In Delahay, eds. R.J. and C.J. Spray. Proceedings of the Oxford Lead Symposium. Lead ammunition: understanding and minimising the risks to human and environmental health. Oxford, UK: Edward Grey Institute, The University of Oxford.

  • Kanstrup, N. 2012. Lead in game birds in Denmark: levels and sources Danish Academy of Hunting. 2012-02-1. Link.

  • Kanstrup, N. 2019. Lessons learnt from 33 years regulation of lead shot in Denmark. In Lead in hunting ammunition: Persistent problems and solutions, eds. N. Kanstrup, V.G. Thomas, and A.D. Fox, Ambio vol. 48, Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1125-9.

  • Kanstrup, N., and T.J.S. Balsby. 2018. Plastic litter from shotgun ammunition on Danish coastlines—amounts and provenance. Environmental Pollution 2018: 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.087.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanstrup, N., J. Swift, D. Stroud, and M. Lewis. 2018. Hunting with lead ammunition is not sustainable: European perspectives. Ambio 47: 846–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1042-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pain, D.J., R. Mateo and R.E. Green. 2019. Effects of lead from ammunition on wildlife: a review and update. In Lead in hunting ammunition: Persistent problems and solutions, eds. N. Kanstrup, V.G. Thomas, and A.D. Fox, Ambio vol. 48, Special Issue.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank 15. Juni Fonden, Arboretet, Kirkegårdsvej 3A, DK-2970 Hørsholm for the grant given to the Danish Academy of Hunting for the study period 2017-2018. Not least, we are grateful to Klosterhedens Vildt who assisted with collection of test samples, to Tony Fox for helpful comments to previous drafts, and to Annija Užule for useful assistance with necropsy of bird carcasses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Kanstrup.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanstrup, N., Balsby, T.J.S. Danish pheasant and mallard hunters comply with the lead shot ban. Ambio 48, 1009–1014 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01152-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01152-7

Keywords

  • Ammunition
  • Bismuth shot
  • Compliance
  • Hunting
  • Poisoning
  • Steel shot