Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 999–1008 | Cite as

Lessons learned from 33 years of lead shot regulation in Denmark

  • Niels KanstrupEmail author
Lead Use in Hunting

Abstract

Denmark was the first European country to completely ban lead shot for hunting and target shooting. This paper reviews the process behind this phase-out to document its history, successes, and pitfalls, and to make the Danish experiences accessible for the benefit of other countries, authorities, and stakeholders who face nature management challenges implementing similar change. A review of the content of magazines published by the three hunters’ organizations during the 1978–1992 transition period was carried out, to assess the general discourse and identify the primary concerns and attitudes during the phase-out of lead shot for hunting in Denmark. Hunters were initially negative towards the change. Resistance was driven by concern about the quality, safety issues, and expensive cost of non-toxic alternatives, compounded by lack of organizational leadership and tensions between stakeholders. As a result of the widening appreciation of the environmental effects of dispersed lead shot and the introduction of new generations of alternative shot types, hunter attitudes became positive and constructive. Change need not pose an obstruction to continued hunting opportunity. On the contrary, it is believed that the value from the enhancement of the public image of hunters resulting from the reduction in the environmental dispersal of a recognized contaminant is of paramount importance for the long-term political sustainability of hunting.

Keywords

Ammunition Efficacy Hunting Lead Safety Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to colleagues, in particular, Hans Peter Hansen and Tony Fox, who made valuable comments that improved earlier drafts. Vernon Thomas also supported the process considerably. I thank also peer reviewers who gave substantial and very helpful comments and suggested many relevant improvements.

References

  1. Anderson, W.L., S.P. Havera, and B.W. Zercher. 2000. Ingestion of lead and nontoxic shotgun pellets by ducks in the Mississippi Flyway. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 848–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach, J., and I.M. Thomsen. 1992. Konsekvenser ved stålhagl i skoven. Skoven 24: 97–98.Google Scholar
  3. Bellrose, F.C. 1959. Lead poisoning as a mortality factor in waterfowl populations. Bulletin: Illinois Natural History Survey 7 27: 233–238.Google Scholar
  4. Clausen, B., and C. Wolstrup. 1979. Lead poisoning in game from Denmark. Danish Review of Game Biology 11: 1–22.Google Scholar
  5. Clausen, K.K., T.E. Holm, L. Haugaard, and J. Madsen. 2017. Crippling ratio: A novel approach to assess hunting-induced wounding of wild animals. Ecological Indicators 80: 242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cromie, R., J. Newth, J. Reeves, M. O’Brien, K. Beckmann, and M. Brown. 2015. The sociological and political aspects of reducing lead poisoning from ammunition in the UK: Why the transition to non-toxic ammunition is so difficult. In Proceedings of the Oxford Lead Symposium. Lead ammunition: Understanding and minimising the risks to human and environmental health, ed. R.J. Delahay and C.J. Spray. Oxford: Edward Grey Institute, The University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Dansk Jagt. 1987. Blyhagl-razzia—jægere står til bøde. Notice in Dansk Jagt. December 1987, p. 6.Google Scholar
  8. Eskildsen, J. 1980. Tætheden af blyhagl i lavvandede vestjyske fjordområder. Naturhistorisk Museum.Google Scholar
  9. Hartmann, P. 1982. Stålhaglpatroner. Vurdering af stålhaglpatroners egnethed til jagt i Danmark. København: Miljøstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  10. Kanstrup, N. 1987. Jernhaglpatroners anvendelighed. Jagt- & Fiskeri, 10/1987.Google Scholar
  11. Kanstrup, N. 2012. Lead in game birds in Denmark: Levels and sources. Danish Academy of Hunting. Article 2012-1.Google Scholar
  12. Kanstrup, N. 2015. Practical and social barriers to switching from lead to non-toxic gunshot—A perspective from the EU. In Proceedings of the Oxford Lead Symposium. Lead ammunition: Understanding and minimising the risks to human and environmental health, ed. R.J. Delahay and C.J. Spray. Oxford: Edward Grey Institute, The University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Kanstrup, N., and T.J.S. Balsby. 2018. Plastic litter from shotgun ammunition on Danish coastlines—Amounts and provenance. Environmental Pollution 237: 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanstrup, N. and K. Stenkjær. 2015. Skovhagl—er der fortsat grundlag for en særlig forvaltning? Institute of Geoscience and Nature Management, Copenhagen University. Report. Maj 2015. ISBN 978-87-7903711-3 (with an English summary). https://forskning.ku.dk/find-en-forsker/?pure=files%2F138856612%2Fskovhagl_IGU.pdf.
  15. Kanstrup, N., V.G. Thomas, O. Krone, and C. Gremse. 2016. The transition to non-lead rifle ammunition in Denmark: National obligations and policy considerations. Ambio 45: 621–628.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0780-y.
  16. Kanstrup, N., J. Swift, D.A. Stroud, and M. Lewis. 2018. Hunting with lead ammunition is not sustainable: European perspectives. Ambio 47: 846–857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1042-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lumeij, J.T., H. Hendriks, A. Timmers, and A. 1989. The prevalence of lead shot ingestion in wild mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in the Netherlands. Veterinary Quarterly 11: 51–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.1989.9694196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mateo, R., N. Vallverdú-Coll, A. López-Antia, M.A. Taggart, M. Martínez-Haro, R. Guitart, and M.E. Ortiz-Santaliestra. 2014. Reducing Pb poisoning in birds and Pb exposure in game meat consumers: The dual benefit of effective Pb shot regulation. Environment International 63: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meltofte, H., and B.D. Petersen. 1979. Forekomst af blyhagl i vestjyske vådområder samt i kråsen hos danske ænder. DOFT 73: 265–272.Google Scholar
  20. Mondain-Monval, J.Y., P. Defos du Rau, M. Guillemain, and A. Olivier. 2015. Switch to non-toxic shot in the Camargue, France: Effect on waterbird contamination and hunter effectiveness. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0897-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Munch, B. 1968. Blyforgiftning hos fuglevildt efter optagelse af hagl. Dansk Vildtforskning 1967–68. Meddelelse nr. 65 fra Vildtbiologisk Station.Google Scholar
  22. Noer, H., J. Madsen, H. Strandgaard, and P. Hartmann. 1996. Anskydning af vildt. - TEMA-rapport fra DMU, nr. 8.Google Scholar
  23. Pierce, B.L., T.A. Roster, M.C. Frisbie, C.D. Mason, and J.A. Roberson. 2014. A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning doves. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39: 103–115.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Politiken. 2011. Jægere bruger stadig blyhagl trods forbud. Newspaper article 11 March 2011.Google Scholar
  25. Samuel, M.D., and E.F. Bowers. 2000. Lead exposure in American black ducks after implementation of non-toxic shot. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 947–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stevenson, A.L., A.M. Scheuhammer, and H.M. Chan. 2005. Effects of nontoxic shot regulations on lead accumulation in ducks and American woodcock in Canada. Archives of Environmental Contamination Toxicology 48: 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strandgaard, H. 1993. Untersuchungen zur tötenden Wirkung von Eisen- und Bleischroten. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft (1993) 39: 34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310215.Google Scholar
  28. Stroud, D. 2015. Regulation of some sources of lead poisoning: A brief review. In Proceedings of the Oxford Lead Symposium. Lead Ammunition: Understanding and minimising the risks to human and environmental health, ed. R.J. Delahay and C.J. Spray, 152 pp. UK: Edward Grey Institute, The University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Thomas, V.G., N. Kanstrup, and C. Gremse. 2015. Key questions and responses regarding the transition to use of lead-free ammunition. In Proceedings of the Oxford Lead Symposium. Lead ammunition: Understanding and minimising the risks to human and environmental health, ed. R.J. Delahay and C.J. Spray, 125–135. Oxford: The Edward Grey Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Wium-Andersen, S. 1973. Bly … et regneeksempel. Feltornitologen 1: 27.Google Scholar
  31. Wium-Andersen, S., and N.E. Franzmann. 1974. Dør andefugle af at spise blyhagl? Feltornitologen 1974: 14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Bioscience – KaløAarhus UniversityRøndeDenmark

Personalised recommendations