Bird on the wire: Landscape planning considering costs and benefits for bird populations coexisting with power lines

Abstract

Power-line grids are increasingly expanding worldwide, as well as their negative impacts on avifauna, namely the direct mortality through collision and electrocution, the reduction of breeding performance, and the barrier effect. On the other hand, some bird species can apparently benefit from the presence of power lines, for example perching for hunting purposes or nesting on electricity towers. In this perspective essay, we reviewed the scientific literature on both costs and benefits for avifauna coexisting with power lines. Overall, we detected a generalized lack of studies focusing on these costs or benefits at a population level. We suggest that a switch in research approach to a larger spatio-temporal scale would greatly improve our knowledge about the actual effects of power lines on bird populations. This research approach would facilitate suitable landscape planning encompassing both mitigation of costs and promotion of benefits for bird populations coexisting with power lines. For example, the strategic route planning of electricity infrastructures would limit collision risk or barrier effects for threatened bird populations. Concurrently, this strategic route planning would promote the range expansion of threatened populations of other bird species, by providing nesting structures in treeless but potentially suitable landscapes. We suggest establishing a collaborative dialogue among the scientific community, governments, and electricity companies, with the aim to produce a win–win scenario in which both biodiversity conservation and infrastructure development are integrated in a common strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ABS Energy Research. 2008. The T&D Report. London: Tech. rep.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso, J.C., J.A. Alonso, and R. Muñoz-Pulido. 1994. Mitigation of bird collisions with transmission lines through groundwire marking. Biological Conservation 67: 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, A. 1990. Fragmentation of habitat by roads and utility corridors: A review. Australian Journal of Zoology 26: 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold, T.W., and R.M. Zink. 2011. Collision mortality has no discernible effect on population trends of North American birds. PLoS ONE 6: e24708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Askins, R.A. 1994. Open corridors in a heavily forested landscape: Impact on shrubland and forest-interior birds. Wildlife Society Bulletein 22: 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bagli, S., D. Geneletti, and F. Orsi. 2011. Routeing of power lines through least-cost path analysis and multicriteria evaluation to minimise environmental impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment 31: 234–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, J., R.L. Goldingay, and R.J. Whelan. 1998. Powerline easements through forests: a case study of impacts on avifauna. Pacific Conservation Biology 4: 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrientos, R., J.C. Alonso, C. Ponce, and C. Palacín. 2011. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of marked wire in reducing avian collisions with power lines. Conservation Biology 25: 893–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrientos, R., C. Ponce, C. Palacín, C.A. Martín, B. Martín, and J.C. Alonso. 2012. Wire marking results in a small but significant reduction in avian mortality at power lines: A BACI designed study. PLoS ONE 7: e32569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Benítez-López, A., R. Alkemade, and P.A. Verweij. 2010. The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: A meta-analysis. Biological Conservation 143: 1307–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berman, E., L. Chacon, D. House, B.A. Koch, W.E. Koch, J. Leal, S. Løvtrup, E. Mantiply, et al. 1990. Development of chicken embryos in a pulsed magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics 11: 169–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bevanger, K. 1994. Bird interactions with utility structures: Collision and electrocution, causes and mitigating measures. Ibis 136: 412–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bevanger, K. 1995. Estimates and population consequences of tetraonid mortality caused by collisions with high tension power lines in Norway. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 745–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bevanger, K. 1998. Biological and conservation aspects of bird mortality caused by electricity power lines: A review. Biological Conservation 86: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bevanger, K., and H. Brøseth. 2001. Bird collisions with power lines - an experiment with ptarmigan (Lagopus spp.). Biological Conservation 99: 341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blumstein, D.T., E. Fernández-Juricic, O. LeDee, E.J. Larsen, I. Rodriguez-Prieto, and C. Zugmeyer. 2004. Avian risk assessment: Effects of perching height and detectability. Ethology 110: 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boeker, E.L., and P.R. Nickerson. 1975. Raptor electrocutions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burgio, K.R., M.A. Rubega, and D. Sustaita. 2014. Nest-building behavior of monk parakeets and insights into potential mechanisms for reducing damage to utility poles. PeerJ 2: e601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Catry, I., J. Marcelino, A.M.A. Franco, and F. Moreira. 2017. Landscape determinants of European roller foraging habitat: Implications for the definition of agri-environmental measures for species conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 26: 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clarke, D.J., K.A. Pearce, and J.G. White. 2006. Powerline corridors: Degraded ecosystems or wildlife havens? Wildlife Research 33: 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cunningham, S.J., C.F. Madden, P. Barnard, and A. Amar. 2016. Electric crows: Powerlines, climate change and the emergence of a native invader. Diversity and Distributions 22: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dean, W.R.J., S.J. Milton, and M.D. Anderson. 2006. Use of road kills and roadside vegetation by pied and Cape crows in semi-arid South Africa. Ostrich 77: 102–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Doherty, P.F., and T.C. Grubb. 1998. Reproductive success of cavity-nesting birds breeding under high-voltage powerlines. American Midland Naturalist 140: 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Donázar, J.A., C.J. Palacios, L. Gangoso, O. Ceballos, M.J. González, and F. Hiraldo. 2002. Conservation status and limiting factors in the endangered population of Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in the Canary Islands. Biological Conservation 107: 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Drewitt, A.L., and R.H.W. Langston. 2008. Collision effects of wind-power generators and other obstacles on birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1134: 233–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fargallo, J.A., G. Blanco, J. Potti, and J. Viñuela. 2001. Nestbox provisioning in a rural population of Eurasian kestrels: Breeding performance, nest predation and parasitism. Bird Study 48: 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernie, K.J., and S.J. Reynolds. 2005. The effects of electromagnetic fields from power lines on avian reproductive biology and physiology: A review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health B 8: 127–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferrer, M., M. de la Riva, and J. Castroviejo. 1991. Electrocution of raptors on power lines in southwestern Spain. Journal of Field Ornithology 62: 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gilmer, D.S., and J.M. Wiehe. 1977. Nesting by ferruginous hawks and other raptors on high voltage powerline towers. Prairie National Geographic Society 9: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harness, R.E., and K.R. Wilson. 2001. Electric-utility structures associated with raptor electrocutions in rural areas. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 612–623.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Henderson, I.G., R.H.W. Langston, and N.A. Clark. 1996. The response of common terns Sterna hirundo to power lines: An assessment of risk in relation to breeding commitment, age and wind speed. Biological Conservation 77: 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Infante, O., and S. Peris. 2003. Bird nesting on electric power supports in northwestern Spain. Ecological Engineering 20: 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Janiszewski, T., P. Minias, and Z. Wojciechowski. 2015. Selective forces responsible for transition to nesting on electricity poles in the white stork Ciconia ciconia. Ardea 103: 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Janss, G.F.E. 1998. Nests of white storks on electric utility towers. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Janss, G.F.E. 2000. Avian mortality from power lines: A morphologic approach of a species-specific mortality. Biological Conservation 95: 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Janss, G.F.E., and M. Ferrer. 2000. Common crane and great bustard collision with power lines: Collision rate and risk exposure. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 675–680.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Janss, G.F.E., and M. Ferrer. 2001. Avian electrocution mortality in relation to pole design and adjacent habitat in Spain. Bird Conservation International 11: 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Janss, G.F.E., and I. Sánchez. 1997. Productivity of white storks at different nest sites. Ardeola 44: 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jenkins, A.R., J.J. Smallie, and M. Diamond. 2010. Avian collisions with power lines: A global review of causes and mitigation with a South African perspective. Bird Conservation International 20: 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaługa, I., T.H. Sparks, and P. Tryjanowski. 2011. Reducing death by electrocution of the white stork Ciconia ciconia. Conservation Letters 4: 483–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. King, D.I., and B.E. Byers. 2002. An evaluation of powerline rights-of-way as habitat for early-successional shrubland birds. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 868–874.

    Google Scholar 

  42. King, D.I., R.B. Chandler, J.M. Collins, W.R. Petersen, and T.E. Lautzenheiser. 2009. Effects of width, edge and habitat on the abundance and nesting success of scrub-shrub birds in powerline corridors. Biological Conservation 142: 2672–2680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kmetova, E., P. Zhelev, A. Mechev, G. Gradev, and I. Ivanov. 2012. Natural colonies of lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni) in European Turkey and discussion on the chances of natural re-colonization of the species in Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 4: 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Larsen, J.K., and J. Madsen. 2000. Effects of wind turbines and other physical elements on field utilization by pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus): A landscape perspective. Landscape Ecology 15: 755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lehman, R.N., P.L. Kennedy, and J.A. Savidge. 2007. The state of the art in raptor electrocution research: A global review. Biological Conservation 136: 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lipp, H.-P., A.L. Vyssotski, D.P. Wolfer, S. Renaudineau, M. Savini, G. Tröster, and G. Dell’Omo. 2004. Pigeon homing along highways and exits. Current Biology 14: 1239–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Loss, S.R., T. Will, and P.P. Marra. 2014. Refining estimates of bird collision and electrocution mortality at power lines in the United States. PLoS ONE 9: e101565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mainwaring, M.C. 2015. The use of man-made structures as nesting sites by birds: A review of the costs and benefits. Journal for Nature Conservation 25: 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Maricato, L., R. Faria, V. Madeira, P. Carreira, and A.T. de Almeida. 2016. White stork risk mitigation in high voltage electric distribution networks. Ecological Engineering 91: 212–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Martin, G.R. 2011. Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: A sensory ecology approach. Ibis 153: 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Martin, G.R., and J.M. Shaw. 2010. Bird collisions with power lines: Failing to see the way ahead? Biological Conservation 143: 2695–2702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Meunier, F.D., C. Verheyden, and P. Jouventin. 2000. Use of roadsides by diurnal raptors in agricultural landscapes. Biological Conservation 92: 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Møller, A.P., J.T. Nielsen, and L.Z. Garamszegi. 2006. Song post exposure, song features, and predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 17: 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Moreira, F., V. Encarnação, G. Rosa, N. Gilbert, S. Infante, J. Costa, M. D’Amico, R.C. Martins, and I. Catry. 2017. Wired: Impacts of increasing power line use by a growing bird population. Environmental Research Letters 12: 024019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Morelli, F., M. Beim, L. Jerzak, D. Jones, and P. Tryjanowski. 2014. Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds?: A review. Transportation Research Part D 30: 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Morelli, F., E. Mróz, F. Pruscini, R. Santolini, A. Goławski, and P. Tryjanowski. 2016. Habitat structure, breeding stage and sex affect hunting success of breeding red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio). Ethology Ecology and Evolution 28: 136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Morkill, A.E., and S.H. Anderson. 1991. Effectiveness of marking powerlines to reduce sandhill crane collisions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 19: 442–449.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mueller, H.C., and D.D. Berger. 1967. Wind drift, leading lines, and diurnal migration. The Wilson Bulletin 79: 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Prather, P.R., and T.A. Messmer. 2010. Raptor and corvid response to power distribution line perch deterrents in Utah. Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 796–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rich, A.C., D.S. Dobkin, and L.J. Niles. 1994. Defining forest fragmentation by corridor width: The influence of narrow forest-dividing corridors on forest-nesting birds in southern New Jersey. Conservation Biology 8: 1109–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rubolini, D., E. Bassi, G. Bogliani, P. Galeotti, and R. Garavaglia. 2001. Eagle owl Bubo bubo and power line interactions in the Italian Alps. Bird Conservation International 11: 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rubolini, D., M. Gustin, G. Bogliani, and R. Garavaglia. 2005. Birds and powerlines in Italy: An assessment. Bird Conservation International 15: 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Savereno, A.J., L.A. Savereno, R. Boettcher, and S.M. Haig. 1996. Avian behavior and mortality at power lines in coastal South Carolina. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 636–648.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shaw, J.M., A.R. Jenkins, J.J. Smallie, and P.G. Ryan. 2010. Modelling power-line collision risk for the blue crane Anthropoides paradiseus in South Africa. Ibis 152: 590–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Shobrak, M. 2012. Electrocution and collision of birds with power lines in Saudi Arabia. Zoology in the Middle East 57: 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Silva, J.P., M. Santos, L. Queirós, D. Leitão, F. Moreira, M. Pinto, M. Leqoc, and J.A. Cabral. 2010. Estimating the influence of overhead transmission power lines and landscape context on the density of little bustard Tetrax tetrax breeding populations. Ecological Modelling 221: 1954–1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Strevens, T.C., M.L. Puotinen, and R.J. Whelan. 2008. Powerline easements: ecological impacts and contribution to habitat fragmentation from linear features. Pacific Conservation Biology 14: 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tryjanowski, P., J.Z. Kosicki, S. Kuźniak, and T.H. Sparks. 2009. Long-term changes and breeding success in relation to nesting structures used by the white stork, Ciconia ciconia. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46: 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Tyler, N., K.-A. Stokkan, C. Hogg, C. Nellemann, A.-I. Vistnes, and G. Jeffery. 2014. Ultraviolet vision and avoidance of power lines in birds and mammals. Conservation Biology 28: 630–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vaitkuvienė, D., and M. Dagys. 2014. Possible effects of electromagnetic field on white storks Ciconia ciconia breeding on low-voltage electricity line poles. Zoology and Ecology 24: 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Vardanis, Y., R.H.G. Klaassen, R. Strandberg, and T. Alerstam. 2011. Individuality in bird migration: Routes and timing. Biology Letters 7: 502–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Yosef, R. 2009. Highways as flyways: time and energy optimization in migratory Levant sparrowhawk. Journal of Arid Environments 73: 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MD and RCM benefited from post-doctoral grants funded by REN Biodiversity Chair and FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia). IC benefited from a post-doctoral grant from FCT (SFRH/BPD/102637/2014). RB and FA benefited from post-doctoral grants funded by IP Biodiversity Chair and FCT. FM was funded by the REN Biodiversity Chair and FCT (IF/01053/2015). Leonard N. Cohen inspired the title. Sasha Vasconcelos kindly improved the English.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello D’Amico.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 462 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Amico, M., Catry, I., Martins, R.C. et al. Bird on the wire: Landscape planning considering costs and benefits for bird populations coexisting with power lines. Ambio 47, 650–656 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1025-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Barrier effect
  • Collision
  • Electrocution
  • Nesting platforms
  • Route planning
  • Win–win scenario