Ambio

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Large-scale environmental degradation results in inequitable impacts to already impoverished communities: A case study from the floating villages of Cambodia

  • Glenn Althor
  • Simon Mahood
  • Bradd Witt
  • Rebecca M. Colvin
  • James E.M. Watson
Research Article
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

Cambodian subsistence communities within the Tonle Sap Great Lake area rely on resource extraction from the lake to meet livelihood needs. These fishing communities—many of which consist of dwellings floating on the lake—face potentially profound livelihood challenges because of climate change and changing hydrology due to dam construction for hydroelectricity within the Mekong Basin. We conducted interviews across five village communities, with local subsistence fisher people in the Tonle Sap in 2015, and used thematic analysis methods to reveal a fishery system that is undergoing rapid ecological decline, with local fishing communities increasingly experiencing reductions in available fish stocks. As a result, over 100 000 people living in these communities are experiencing a direct loss of well-being and livelihood. We discuss these losses and consider their implications for the future viability of Cambodian floating village communities.

Keywords

Climate change Distributive justice Human well-being Mekong basin Subsistence livelihoods Tonle Sap Great Lake 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend thanks to the following people whose contributions made this project possible. Gnuen Gneb, for providing translation services in the field and for very patiently acting as a cultural guide. The village and commune chiefs for their time, patience, and critical input into this project. All participants and their families who took the time to speak to us, and very kindly host us within their homes during interviews. Very kind thanks to Phien Sayon, and the entire Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Cambodia team for their amazing support and facilitation of this project. Special thanks to Mr Long Kheng, Chief of the TSBR and Mr Sun Visal, from the Department of Freshwater Wetlands, Ministry of Environment, and the staff of the Fisheries Administration, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. This work was part funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP140100733) to JW. Additional funding by The Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship to GA (PN: 3018293). Funding for translation work provided by WCS, Cambodia.

Author Contributions

G.A., designed the analysis, performed all fieldwork, and analysed results. All authors contributed to writing the paper.

Supplementary material

13280_2018_1022_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1651 kb)

References

  1. Abers, R.N., MSd Oliveira, and A.K. Pereira. 2017. Inclusive development and the asymmetric state: Big projects and local communities in the Brazilian Amazon. The Journal of Development Studies 53: 857–872.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, W.M., R. Aveling, D. Brockington, B. Dickson, J. Elliott, J. Hutton, D. Roe, B. Vira, et al. 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 1146–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Obaid, S., B. Samraoui, J. Thomas, H.A. El-Serehy, A.H. Alfarhan, W. Schneider, and M. O’Connell. 2017. An overview of wetlands of Saudi Arabia: Values, threats, and perspectives. Ambio 46: 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Althor, G., J.E.M. Watson, and R.A. Fuller. 2016. Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Scientific Reports 6: 20281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arias, M.E., T.A. Cochrane, and V. Elliott. 2014. Modelling future changes of habitat and fauna in the Tonle Sap wetland of the Mekong. Environmental Conservation 41: 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arias, M.E., T.A. Cochrane, D. Norton, T.J. Killeen, and P. Khon. 2013. The flood pulse as the underlying driver of vegetation in the largest wetland and fishery of the Mekong Basin. Ambio 42: 864–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arias, M.E., T.A. Cochrane, T. Piman, M. Kummu, B.S. Caruso, and T.J. Killeen. 2012. Quantifying changes in flooding and habitats in the Tonle Sap Lake (Cambodia) caused by water infrastructure development and climate change in the Mekong Basin. Journal of Environmental Management 112: 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, J.S., N.L. Poff, P.L. Angermeier, C.N. Dahm, P.H. Gleick, N.G. Hairston, R.B. Jackson, C.A. Johnston, et al. 2002. Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater. Ecological Applications 12: 1247–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beger, M., A.R. Harborne, T.P. Dacles, J.L. Solandt, and G.L. Ledesma. 2004. A framework of lessons learned from community-based marine reserves and its effectiveness in guiding a new coastal management initiative in the Philippines. Environmental Management 34: 786–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berbés-Blázquez, M., J.A. González, and U. Pascual. 2016. Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 19: 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernard, H.R., and C.C. Gravlee. 2014. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, I.C., C. Poole, W. Giesen, and J. Valbo-Jorgensen. 2006. Species diversity and ecology of Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia. Aquatic Sciences 68: 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carpenter, S.R., and W.A. Brock. 2008. Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecology and Society 13: 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CDRI. 2013. Climate change adaptation and livelihoods in inclusive growth: A review of climate change impacts and adaptive capacity in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: CDRI.Google Scholar
  17. Chea, R., C. Guo, G. Grenouillet, and S. Lek. 2016. Toward an ecological understanding of a flood-pulse system lake in a tropical ecosystem: Food web structure and ecosystem health. Ecological Modelling 323: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooperman, M.S., N. So, M. Arias, T.A. Cochrane, V. Elliott, T. Hand, L. Hannah, G.W. Holtgrieve, et al. 2012. A watershed moment for the Mekong: newly announced community use and conservation areas for the Tonle Sap Lake may boost sustainability of the world’s largest inland fishery. Cambodian Journal of Natural History 2012: 101–106.Google Scholar
  19. Cunningham, S.C., J.R. Thomson, R. Mac Nally, J. Read, and P.J. Baker. 2011. Groundwater change forecasts widespread forest dieback across an extensive floodplain system. Freshwater Biology 56: 1494–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrlich, P.R., P.M. Kareiva, and G.C. Daily. 2012. Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization. Nature 486: 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erwin, K.L. 2009. Wetlands and global climate change: The role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management 17: 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ESRI ArcGIS Pro. 2017. 1.4.1, 1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
  23. FAO. 2001. In Tonle Sap fisheries: A case study on floodplain gillnet fisheries, ed. D. Lamberts. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
  24. FAO. 2017. Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles: The Kingdom of Cambodia. http://www.fao.org/fishery/facp/KHM/en.
  25. Fisher, J.A., G. Patenaude, K. Giri, K. Lewis, P. Meir, P. Pinho, M.D.A. Rounsevell, and M. Williams. 2014. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A conceptual framework. Ecosystem Services 7: 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Francis, J.J., M. Johnston, C. Robertson, L. Glidewell, V. Entwistle, M.P. Eccles, and J.M. Grimshaw. 2010. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health 25: 1229–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frith, H., and K. Gleeson. 2004. Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men and Masculinity 5: 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillespie, J. 2016. Catch 22: Wetlands protection and fishing for survival. Geographical Research 54: 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goñi, R., R. Hilborn, D. Díaz, S. Mallol, and S. Adlerstein. 2010. Net contribution of spillover from a marine reserve to fishery catches. Marine Ecology Progress Series 400: 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guest, G., K. MacQueen, and E. Namey. 2012. Themes and codes. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang, R. 2014. RQDA: R-based Qualitative data analysis. 0.2-7 ed.Google Scholar
  33. Keskinen, M. 2006. The lake with floating villages: Socio-economic analysis of the Tonle Sap Lake. International Journal of Water Resources Development 22: 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keskinen, M., M. Kummu, A. Salmivaara, S. Paradis, H. Lauri, H. de Moel, P. Ward, and P. Sokhem. 2011. Baseline results from hydrological and livelihood analyses, exploring Tonle Sap futures. Espoo: Aalto University.Google Scholar
  35. Kitzinger, C., and J. Willmott. 2002. ‘The thief of womanhood’: women’s experience of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Social Science and Medicine 54: 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar, S. 2015. Green climate fund faces slew of criticism. Nature 527: 419–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kummu, M., and J. Sarkkula. 2008. Impact of the Mekong River flow alteration on the Tonle Sap flood pulse. Ambio 37: 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kummu, M., M. Keskinen, and O. Varis. 2008a. Modern Myths of the Mekong: A critical review of water and development concepts, principles and policies. In Modern Myths of the Mekong, ed. M. Kummu, M. Keskinen, and O. Varis, 206. Espoo: Water & Development Publications—Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
  39. Kummu, M., D. Penny, J. Sarkkula, and J. Koponen. 2008b. Sediment: Curse or blessing for Tonle Sap Lake? Ambio 37: 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lamberts, D. 2008. Little impact, much damage: The consequences of Mekong River flow alterations for the tonle sap ecosystem. In Modern myths of the Mekong, ed. M. Kummu, 3–18. Espoo: Water & Development Publications—Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
  41. Lauri, H., H. de Moel, P.J. Ward, T.A. Räsänen, M. Keskinen, and M. Kummu. 2012. Future changes in Mekong River hydrology: Impact of climate change and reservoir operation on discharge. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16: 4603–4619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leal Filho, W., D.-M. Pociovalisteanu, and A.Q. Al-Amin. 2017. Sustainable economic development green economy and green growth. New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Lemieux, C.J., P.A. Gray, A.G. Douglas, G. Nielsen, and D. Pearson. 2014. From science to policy: The making of a watershed-scale climate change adaptation strategy. Environmental Science & Policy 42: 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewis-Beck, M., A. Bryman, and T. Futing Liao. 2004. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mak, S. 2015. The Governance of Wetlands in the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B 4: 331–346.Google Scholar
  46. Manorom, K., I.G. Baird, and B. Shoemaker. 2017. The World Bank, hydropower-based poverty alleviation and indigenous peoples: On-the-ground realities in the Xe Bang Fai River Basin of Laos. Forum for Development Studies 44: 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2000. Ecosystems and human well-being wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  48. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, D.C: Island Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mekong River Commission. 2016. Integrated water resources management-based basin development strategy for the Lower Mekong Basin 2016–2020. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  50. Middleton, B.A., and N.J. Souter. 2016. Functional integrity of freshwater forested wetlands, hydrologic alteration, and climate change. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2: e01200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. MoE, C. 2005. Vulnerability and adaptation to climate hazards and to climate change: A survey of rural cambodian households. Phnom Penh: Ministry of Environment, Cambodia.Google Scholar
  52. MRCS. 2014. National-to-Local benefit sharing options for hydropower on Mekong tributaries evaluated and reported by 2014. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.Google Scholar
  53. Nalepa, R.A., A.G. Short Gianotti, and D.M. Bauer. 2017. Marginal land and the global land rush: A spatial exploration of contested lands and state-directed development in contemporary Ethiopia. Geoforum 82: 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nuorteva, P., M. Keskinen, and O. Varis. 2010. Water, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in the Tonle Sap Lake area, Cambodia: learning from the past to understand the future. Journal of Water and Climate Change 1: 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2015. Social equity and large mining projects: Voluntary industry initiatives, public regulation and community development agreements. Journal of Business Ethics 132: 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Orr, S., J. Pittock, A. Chapagain, and D. Dumaresq. 2012. Dams on the Mekong River: Lost fish protein and the implications for land and water resources. Global Environmental Change 22: 925–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pauline Dube, O., and M. Sivakumar. 2015. Global environmental change and vulnerability of Least Developed Countries to extreme events: Editorial on the special issue. Weather and Climate Extremes 7: 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Piman, T., T. Lennaerts, and P. Southalack. 2013. Assessment of hydrological changes in the lower Mekong Basin from Basin-Wide development scenarios. Hydrological Processes 27: 2115–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. R Core Development Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  60. Ramsar. 2017. Cambodia Country Profile. http://www.ramsar.org/wetland/cambodia.
  61. Ratner, B.D., S. So, K. Mam, I. Oeur, and S. Kim. 2017. Conflict and collective action in Tonle Sap fisheries: adapting governance to support community livelihoods. Natural Resources Forum 41: 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Roos, N., C. Chamnan, D. Loeung, J. Jakobsen, and S.H. Thilsted. 2007. Freshwater fish as a dietary source of vitamin A in Cambodia. Food Chemistry 103: 1104–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Russ, G.R., and A.C. Alcala. 2011. Enhanced biodiversity beyond marine reserve boundaries: the cup spillith over. Ecological Applications 21: 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sáenz-Arroyo, A., C. Roberts, J. Torre, M. Cariño-Olvera, and R. Enríquez-Andrade. 2005. Rapidly Shifting environmental baselines among fishers of the gulf of california. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 272: 1957–1962.Google Scholar
  66. Shepherd, A., and J. Brunt. 2013. Chronic poverty: concepts, causes and policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sok, S., X. Yu, and K.K. Wong. 2012. Impediments to community fisheries management: Some findings in Kompong Pou commune, Krakor District in Cambodia’s Tonle Sap. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 33: 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sokhem, P., and K. Sunada. 2006. The Governance of the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: Integration of Local, National and International Levels. International Journal of Water Resources Development 22: 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tilt, B., and D. Gerkey. 2016. Dams and population displacement on China’s Upper Mekong River: Implications for social capital and social–ecological resilience. Global Environmental Change 36: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. UNESCO. 1994. Ramsar, convention on wetlands of international importance especially as waterfowl habitat. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  71. UNESCO. 2007. Biosphere reserve information, Cambodia, Tonle Sap. http://www.unesco.org/mabdb/br/brdir/directory/biores.asp?code=CAM+01&mode=all.
  72. UNESCO. 2015. Mab strategy 2015–2025. Paris: United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture.Google Scholar
  73. van Zalinge, N., D. Loeung, N. Pengbun, J. Sarkkula, and J. Koponen. 2000. Mekong flood levels and Tonle Sap fish catches. Meeting of the Department of Fisheries, 28. Phnom Penh: Thai National Mekong Committee Secretariat.Google Scholar
  74. Varis, O., M. Kummu, M. Keskinen, J. Sarkkula, J. Koponen, U. Heinonen, and K. Makkonena. 2006. Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: Nature’s affluence meets human poverty. New York: United Nations Human Development Report.Google Scholar
  75. Watson, J.E.M., N. Dudley, D.B. Segan, and M. Hockings. 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ziv, G., E. Baran, S. Nam, I. Rodríguez-Iturbe, and S.A. Levin. 2012. Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 109: 5609–5614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of QueenslandQueenslandAustralia
  2. 2.Wildlife Conservation Society Cambodia ProgramPhnom PenhCambodia
  3. 3.Research Institute for the Environment and LivelihoodsCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  4. 4.Climate Change InstituteAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  5. 5.Global Conservation ProgramWildlife Conservation SocietyBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations