Skip to main content

The transboundariness approach and prioritization of transboundary aquifers between Mexico and Texas

Ambio volume 47, pages 760–770 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

“Transboundariness” refers to a new approach that identifies and prioritizes transboundary aquifers using socio-economic and political criteria, improving their characterization by using other variables in addition to their mere physical boundaries. This approach is applied to the hydrogeological units/aquifers shared by Mexico and Texas, with the following results. First, the rankings agree with the current level of attention to transboundary aquifers in the region by both countries, providing a quantifiable system that could be tested in other transboundary aquifers. Second, this approach provides a holistic and integrative perspective for transboundary aquifer assessment and prioritization. Third, this prioritization exercise expands the criteria currently used into a more integrative regime of groundwater links to the community as a whole. Finally, the results reflect not only how the transboundary aquifers are being used (or neglected) but also the socio-political context of the populations that depend on these resources for current and future development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

Adapted from Sanchez et al. (2018)

Fig. 2

References

  • Alley, W.M. 2013. Five-Year Interim Report of the United States–Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Program: 2007–2012. 2331-1258, U.S. Geological Survey.

  • Anaya, R. 2001. An overview of the Edwards-Trinity aquifer system, central-west Texas. In Aquifers of West Texas, vol. 356, 100–119. Texas Water Development Board Report.

  • Beach, J.A., L. Symank, Y. Huang, J.B. Ashworth, T. Davidson, E.W. Collins, B.J. Hibbs, B.K. Darling, et al. 2008. Groundwater availability model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas.

  • Bennett, R., and A.N. Sayre. 1962. Geology and ground-water resources of Kinney County. Texas: Texas Water Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghici, R. 2002. Transboundary aquifers of the Del Rio/Ciudad Acuña—Laredo/Nuevo Laredo Region, Texas Water Development Board.

  • Carrillo, J., and C. Schatan. 2005. The Environment and “Maquila” in Mexico; an unavoidable problem, 83. Jorge Carrillo Viveros (in Spanish).

  • City of Carrizo Springs. 2014. Annual Drinking Water Quality Report City of Carrizo Springs.

  • Clark, H. 2016. Regional Geology and Hydrogeology, Part III, Attachment III-E, Appendix III-E.1, Pescadito Environmental Resource Center.

  • CONAGUA. 2006. The Water Quality in Rio Bravo Watershed (in Spanish).

  • CONAGUA. 2015a. Results of the Technical Studies of National Groundwaters of Serriania del Burro Aquifer, 0526, Coahuila state., Technical Subdivision, CONAGUA, Mexico, DF (in Spanish).

  • CONAGUA. 2015b. Update, Annual Average Availability in La Amistad Dam Aquifer (0522), Coahuila State, Technical Subdivision, CONAGUA, Mexico, DF (in Spanish).

  • CONAGUA. 2015c. Update, Annual Average Water Availability in Valle de Juarez Aquifer (0833), Chihuahua State, Technical Subdivision, CONAGUA, Mexico, DF (in Spanish).

  • Darling, B.K., and B.J. Hibbs. 2001. The aquifers of Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat. In Aquifers of West Texas, ed. R.E. Mace, W.F. Mullican III, and E.S. Angle, vol. 356, 226–240. Texas Water Development Board Report, Austin, TX.

  • Davidson, S., and R. Mace. 2006. Aquifers of the Gulf Coast of Texas: An overview. Aquifers of the Gulf Coast of Texas, 1–22. Austin: Texas Water Development Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOF. 2011. Results of the National Groundwater Technical Studies of Allende-Piedras Negras Aquifer, 0501, Coahuila state. Official Journal of the Federation, Mexico, DF (in Spanish).

  • DOF. 2015. Results of the National Groundwater Technical Studies of Santa Fe del Pino Aquifer, 0515, Coahuila state. Official Journal of the Federation, Mexico, DF (in Spanish).

  • Eagle Pass Water Works System. 2015. Consumer Confidence Report for Calendar Year 2015. Eagle Pass Water Works System.

  • Gates, J., J. Nicot, B. Scanlon, and R. Reedy. 2011. Arsenic enrichment in unconfined sections of the southern Gulf Coast aquifer system, Texas. Applied Geochemistry 26: 421–431.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, P., R. Mace, and R. Petrossian. 2011. Aquifers of Texas, Texas Water Development Board, Austin.

  • Hildenbrand, Z.L., D.D. Carlton Jr., J.M. Meik, J.T. Taylor, B.E. Fontenot, J.L. Walton, D. Henderson, J.B. Thacker, et al. 2017. A reconnaissance analysis of groundwater quality in the Eagle Ford shale region reveals two distinct bromide/chloride populations. Science of the Total Environment 575: 672–680.

  • International Boundary & Water Commission (IBWC). 1973. Minute No. 242—Permanent and definitive solution to the international problem of the salinity of the Colorado River. Natural Resources Journal 15: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Boundary & Water Commission (IBWC) 2014. About the Rio Grande. United States and Mexico, United States Section.

  • International Groundwater Resources Assessment Centre IGRAC. 2015. Transboundary Aquifers of the World, UNESCO-IHP (UNESCO International Hydrological Programme). Delft: IGRAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khedun, C.K., A.K. Mishra, J.D. Bolten, H.K. Beaudoing, R.A. Kaiser, J.R. Giardino, and V.P. Singh. 2012. Understanding changes in water availability in the Rio Grande/Río Bravo del Norte basin under the influence of large-scale circulation indices using the Noah land surface model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117: D05104.

  • Lambert, R.B., and C.A. Hartmann. 1999. Quality of ground water in Webb County, Texas, 1997–1998. 2327-6932. U.S. Geological Survey.

  • Land, L.F., J.B. Moring, P.C. Van Metre, D.C. Reutter, B.J. Mahler, A.A. Shipp, and R.L. Ulery. 1992. Water quality in the Trinity River Basin. Texas.

  • Larson, C.E.P.D., M.D. Flora, and J. Reber. 2001. Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas Water Scoping Report, United States Department of the Interior. National Park Service.

  • Monge-Naranjo, A. 2013. Major US trading partners before and after the great recession. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Synopses No. 27.

  • NADB. 2017. Summary of project implementation activities, March 31, 2017, North American Development Bank.

  • Preston, R. 2006. The Yegua-Jackson aquifer. In Aquifers of the Gulf Coast of Texas: Texas Water Development Board Report, 365, ed. R.E. Mace, S.C. Davidson, E.S. Angle, and W.F. Mullican III, 304.

  • Purchase, C., D. Larson, M. Flora, and J. Reber. 2001. Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas. Water Resources Scoping Report. United States Department of the Interior. National Park Service.

  • REPDA. 2015. Groundwater Use. Mexico (in Spanish): Water Rights Public Records.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., and G. Eckstein. 2017. Aquifers shared between Mexico and the United States: Management perspectives and their transboundary nature. Groundwater 55: 495–505.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, F.G., R.P. Solís, E.G. Partida, and A. Camprubí. 2007. Estratigrafía del Noreste de México y su relación con los yacimientos estratoligados de fluorita, barita, celestina y Zn-Pb. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana 59: 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., V. Lopez, and G. Eckstein. 2016. Identifying and characterizing transboundary aquifers along the Mexico–US border: An initial assessment. Journal of Hydrology 535: 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., L. Rodriguez, and C. Tortajada. 2018. Transboundary aquifers between Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas, Mexico and Texas, USA: Identification and categorization. Journal of Hydrology, Regional Studies, Special Edition on Transboundary Aquifers.

  • SEMARNAT. 2002. Presentation of the “New environmental policy in Mexico: Sustainable development”, held by environmental vice-minister Francisco Szekely, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Mexico City (in Spanish).

  • Senate Reports. 2006. Public Law 109-448-December 22, 2006. United States–Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act.

  • Sheng, Z., R.E. Mace, and M.P. Fahy. 2001. The Hueco Bolson: An aquifer at the crossroads. In Aquifers of West Texas, ed. R.E. Mace, W.F. Mullican III, and E.S. Angle, 66–75. Texas Water Development Board Report. Austin, TX: Texas Water Development Board.

  • Strömberg, P. 2002. The Mexican maquila industry and the environment: An overview of the issues, 12. Mexico DF: United Nations Publications.

  • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2017. Binational population data in sister cities along the Rio Grande.

  • TWDB. 2016. Far West Texas Water Plan. Region E: 452.

  • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 2017. Reclamation Managing Water in the West.

  • Van Schoik, R. 2014. The U.S.-Mexico Border economy in transition. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

  • Wilson, C., and E. Lee. 2014. The U.S.–Mexico Border economy in transition. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for financial support under the Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Program (TAAP). The authors recognize and acknowledge the collaboration of TAAP members from the University of Arizona and the University of New Mexico. The authors wish to thank Amy Troung for her collaboration in the collection of data for this research. The public data can be obtained through the referenced websites, and/or from Dr. Rosario Sanchez (rosario@tamu.edu).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M University, MS 2260 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77845, USA

    Rosario Sanchez

  2. Water Management and Hydrological Sciences Program, Texas A&M University, 578 John Kimbrough Blvd. 2260 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Laura Rodriguez

  3. Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469A Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 259770, Singapore

    Cecilia Tortajada

Authors
  1. Rosario Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cecilia Tortajada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosario Sanchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanchez, R., Rodriguez, L. & Tortajada, C. The transboundariness approach and prioritization of transboundary aquifers between Mexico and Texas. Ambio 47, 760–770 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1015-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1015-1

Keywords

  • Mexico
  • Prioritization
  • Texas
  • Transboundariness
  • Transboundary aquifers