The monkey is not always a God: Attitudinal differences toward crop-raiding macaques and why it matters for conflict mitigation
- 87 Downloads
Attitudinal differences toward wildlife have important implications for conflict management and when the species in question have strong cultural and religious associations, conflict mitigation becomes a challenging endeavor. We investigated farmers’ attitudes toward two different crop-raiding macaque species, the rhesus macaque in northern India, and the bonnet macaque in southern India. Apart from regional differences in attitudes, we also assessed temporal changes in attitude toward the rhesus macaque. We carried out household surveys using a semistructured questionnaire to collect data. Our findings reveal that respondents in southern and northern India differ significantly in their views regarding species sanctity and preference for mitigation options. Although people’s perceptions of the rhesus macaques had changed over time in northern India, farmers were still unwilling to cause harm to the macaques. We discuss the underlying causes of these observed differences in attitude and their impact on the management of human–macaque conflict.
KeywordsBonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) Conflict India Management Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta)
The authors thank Vijay Rajput, Sumith Lal, and Girija for their assistance in the field. They would also like to thank Neha Lakhani for insightful discussions on the subject matter of the manuscript. Shaurabh Anand was supported by an institutional fellowship during the course of this study.
- Bisht, G. 2017. Monkeys again declared vermin in Shimla. Hindustan Times, March 22.Google Scholar
- Brennan, E.J., J.G. Else, and J. Altmann. 1985. Ecology and behaviour of a pest primate: Vervet monkeys in a tourist-lodge habitat. African Journal of Ecology 23: 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1985.tb00710.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell-Smith, G., H.V.P. Simanjorang, N. Leader-Williams, and M. Linkie. 2010. Local attitudes and perceptions toward crop-raiding by orangutans (Pongo abelii) and other nonhuman primates in Northern Sumatra, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology 72: 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Census of India. 2011. Primary Census Abstract Data Tables - Himachal Pradesh. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
- Fernando, P., E. Wikramanayake, D. Weerakoon, L.K.A. Jayasinghe, M. Gunawardene, and H.K. Janaka. 2005. Perceptions and patterns of human–elephant conflict in old and new settlements in Sri Lanka: Insights for mitigation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2465–2481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0216-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Freeman, J.R. 1999. Gods, groves and the culture of nature in Kerala. Modern Asian Studies 33, 257–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Himachal Pradesh Forest Department. 2016. Order for payment of incentive for killing of monkeys. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from http://hpforest.nic.in/files/orderforpaymentofincentiveforkillingofmonkey.pdf.
- Indian Express. 2017. Soon, special task force to cull vermin monkeys in Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from http://indianexpress.com/article/india/soon-special-task-force-to-cull-vermin-monkeys-in-himachal-pradesh-4608168/.
- Jardhari, V., P. Rao, and A. Choudhary. 2008. Crop damage by wildlife in a Garhwal Himalayan village. Pune: Kalpvriksha.Google Scholar
- Jayson, E. A. 1998. Studies of Man-Wildlife Conflict in Peppara Wildlife Sanctuary And Adjacent Areas. KFRI Research Report No 140:1-71.Google Scholar
- Jayson, E. A. 1999. Studies on crop damage by wild animals in Kerala and evaluation of control measures. KFRI Research Report No. 169: 1–48.Google Scholar
- Knight, J. 2000. Natural enemies: People–wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lee, T.M., N.S. Sodhi, and D.M. Prawiradilaga. 2009. Determinants of local people’s attitude toward conservation and the consequential effects on illegal resource harvesting in the protected areas of Sulawesi (Indonesia). Environmental Conservation 36: 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892909990178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change. 2016. Gazette Notification No. S.O. 1922 (E) dated 26.05.2016 regarding listing of Rhesus Macaque in Schedule-V of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 in the State of Himachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
- Naughton-Treves, L., and A. Treves. 2005. Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: Crop-raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa. In People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence, ed. R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz, 253–277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Nyhus, P.J., H. Fischer, F. Madden, and S. Osofsky. 2003. Taking the bite out of wildlife damage: The challenges of wildlife compensation schemes. Conservation in Practice 4: 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4629.2003.tb00061.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Radhakrishna, S. 2013. Songs of monkeys: representation of macaques in classical Tamil poetry. In The Macaque Connection: Cooperation and conflict between humans and macaques, ed. S. Radhakrishna, M. A. Huffman, and A. Sinha, 53–68. Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
- Radhakrishna, S., and T.R.S. Raman. 2016. Get the monkey off the back. The Tribune, August 23.Google Scholar
- Rattan, S. 2011. Managing human–macaque conflict in Himachal, India. In Monkeys on the edge: ecology and management of long-tailed macaques and their interface with humans, ed. M. Gumert, A. Fuentes, and L. Jones-Engel, 283–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Singh, M., and N.R. Rao. 2004. Population dynamics and conservation of commensal bonnet macaques. International Journal of Primatology 25: 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000029125.54747.ee.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh, M., A. Kumar, and S. Molur. 2008. Macaca radiata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.Google Scholar
- Treves, A. 2009. The human dimensions of conflicts with wildlife around protected areas. In Wildlife and society: The science of human dimension, ed. M.J. Manfredo, J.J. Vaske, P.J. Brown, D. Decker, and E.A. Duke, 214–228. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Vasan, S. 2001. Community forestry: Historical legacy of Himachal Pradesh. Himalaya 21: 36–45.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. 2006. The analysis of culture. In Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader, 2nd ed, ed. J. Storey, 32–40. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar