A fuzzy logic expert system for evaluating policy progress towards sustainability goals
Evaluating progress towards environmental sustainability goals can be difficult due to a lack of measurable benchmarks and insufficient or uncertain data. Marine settings are particularly challenging, as stakeholders and objectives tend to be less well defined and ecosystem components have high natural variability and are difficult to observe directly. Fuzzy logic expert systems are useful analytical frameworks to evaluate such systems, and we develop such a model here to formally evaluate progress towards sustainability targets based on diverse sets of indicators. Evaluation criteria include recent (since policy enactment) and historical (from earliest known state) change, type of indicators (state, benefit, pressure, response), time span and spatial scope, and the suitability of an indicator in reflecting progress toward a specific objective. A key aspect of the framework is that all assumptions are transparent and modifiable to fit different social and ecological contexts. We test the method by evaluating progress towards four Aichi Biodiversity Targets in Canadian oceans, including quantitative progress scores, information gaps, and the sensitivity of results to model and data assumptions. For Canadian marine systems, national protection plans and biodiversity awareness show good progress, but species and ecosystem states overall do not show strong improvement. Well-defined goals are vital for successful policy implementation, as ambiguity allows for conflicting potential indicators, which in natural systems increases uncertainty in progress evaluations. Importantly, our framework can be easily adapted to assess progress towards policy goals with different themes, globally or in specific regions.
KeywordsAdaptive management Aichi Biodiversity Targets Convention on Biological Diversity Fuzzy logic Policy evaluation
This is a product of the OceanCanada Partnership, funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the Nippon Foundation Nereus Program, a collaborative initiative by the Nippon Foundation and partners including the University of British Columbia.
- Atkins, J.P., D. Burdon, M. Elliott, and A.J. Gregory. 2011. Management of the marine environment: Integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62: 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Backer, H., and J.-M. Leppänen. 2008. The HELCOM system of a vision, strategic goals and ecological objectives: Implementing an ecosystem approach to the management of human activities in the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brotz, L. 2011. Changing jellyfish populations: Trends in Large Marine Ecosystems. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19. The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
- Canadian Council of Resource Ministers. 2014. Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. Government of Canada.Google Scholar
- Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M., W.W.L. Cheung, K. Bodtker, L. Teh, N. Steiner, M. Bailey, C. Hoover, and U.R. Sumaila. 2017. Towards an integrated database on Canadian ocean resources: Benefits, current states, and research gaps. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 74: 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2015-0573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cox, E. 1999. The fuzzy systems handbook: A practitioners guide to building, using, and maintaining fuzzy systems. San Diego: AP Professional.Google Scholar
- Doran, G.T. 1981. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review 70: 35–36.Google Scholar
- IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
- Keith, D.A., J.P. Rodríguez, K.M. Rodríguez-Clark, E. Nicholson, K. Aapala, A. Alonso, M. Asmussen, S. Bachman, et al. 2013. Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. Edited by Matteo Convertino. PLoS ONE 8: e62111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mackinson, S. 2001. Integrating local and scientific knowledge: An example in fisheries science. Environmental Management 27: 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0026702366.
- Marques, A., H.M. Pereira, C. Krug, P.W. Leadley, P. Visconti, S.R. Januchowski-Hartley, R.M. Krug, R. Alkemade, et al. 2014. A framework to identify enabling and urgent actions for the 2020 Aichi Targets. Basic and Applied Ecology 15: 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2014.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mcbride, M., and M. Burgman. 2012. What is expert knowledge, how is such knowledge gathered, and how do we use it to address questions in landscape ecology? In Expert knowledge and its application in landscape ecology, ed. A.H. Perera, C.A. Drew, and C.J. Johnson, 11–38. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1034-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- UN. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/Res/70/1. UN General Assembly. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
- UNEP. 2010. The strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2. Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
- Uusitalo, L., H. Blanchet, J.H. Andersen, O. Beauchard, T. Berg, S. Bianchelli, A. Cantafaro, J. Carstensen, et al. 2016. Indicator-based assessment of marine biological diversity-lessons from 10 case studies across the European Seas. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00159.Google Scholar
- Zadeh, L. 1965. Fuzzy logic and its applications. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar