Ambio

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Amphibian recovery after a decrease in acidic precipitation

  • Dag Dolmen
  • Anders Gravbrøt Finstad
  • Jon Kristian Skei
Research Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

We here report the first sign of amphibian recovery after a strong decline due to acidic precipitation over many decades and peaking around 1980–90. In 2010, the pH level of ponds and small lakes in two heavily acidified areas in southwestern Scandinavia (Aust-Agder and Østfold in Norway) had risen significantly at an (arithmetic) average of 0.14 since 1988–89. Parallel with the general rise in pH, amphibians (Rana temporaria, R. arvalis, Bufo bufo, Lissotriton vulgaris, and Triturus cristatus) had become significantly more common: the frequency of amphibian localities rose from 33% to 49% (n = 115), and the average number of amphibian species per locality had risen from 0.51 to 0.88. In two other (reference) areas, one with better buffering capacity (Telemark, n = 21) and the other with much less input of acidic precipitation (Nord-Trøndelag, n = 106), there were no significant changes in pH or amphibians.

Keywords

Acidity Amphibian decline Habitat recovery Scandinavia Water chemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The hydrochemical analyses, except pH, water colour and conductivity, were carried out by Syverin Lierhagen at the NTNU Department of Chemistry. Ole Kristian Berg performed the paired t test and Lars Rønning the Spearman correlation test. The map was made by Marc Daverdin, and Richard Binns has been the English language consultant.

References

  1. Aas, W., S. Solberg, S. Manø, and K.E. Yttri. 2011. Overvåking av langtransportert forurenset luft og nedbør. Atmosfærisk tilførsel, 2010. (Monitoring of long-range transported air pollutants. Annual report for 2010). Statlig Program for forurensningsovervåking rapport 1099, Klima- og Forurensningsdirektoratet, Oslo, Norway (In Norwegian, English summary.).Google Scholar
  2. Air Pollution. 2014. 30 information sheets on Air Pollution. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://www.air-quality.org.uk/index.php.
  3. AirClim. 2011. Acidification. Air Pollution & Climate Secretariat. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://www.airclim.org/publications/air-and-environment/acidification.
  4. Alewell, C., B. Manderscheid, H. Meesenburg, and J. Bittersohl. 2000. Is acidification still an ecological threat? Nature 407: 856–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrén, C., L. Henrikson, M. Olsson, and G. Nilson. 1988. Effects of pH and aluminium on embryonic and early larval stages of Swedish brown frogs Rana arvalis, R. temporaria and R. dalmatina. Holarctic Ecology 11: 127–135.Google Scholar
  6. ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for on-line pH measurement of water of low conductivity. ASTM D5128–14. Retrieved March 21, 2014, from http://enterprise.astm.org/filtrexx40.cgi?+REDLINE_PAGES/D5128.htm.
  7. Barr, R. 2011. A look at the effects of acid rain on amphibians. Critters 360. Retrieved March 15, 2014, from http://www.critters360.com/index.php/a-look-at-the-effects-of-acid-rain-on-amphibians-2773/.
  8. Bates, D., M. Machler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beebee, T.J.C., and R.A. Griffiths. 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: A watershed for conservation biology? Biological Conservation 125: 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blakar, I.A., and D. Hongve. 1997. On the chemical water quality in Høylandet, a reference area for acidification research. Hydrobiologia 34: 37–47.Google Scholar
  11. Blaustein, A.R., and B.A. Bancroft. 2007. Amphibian population declines: Evolutionary considerations. BioScience 57: 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blaustein, A.R., J.M. Romansic, J.M. Kiesecker, and A.C. Hatch. 2003. Ultraviolet radiation, toxic chemicals and amphibian population declines. Diversity and Distributions 9: 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Böhmer, J., and H. Rahmann. 1990. Influence of surface water acidification on amphibians. In Biology and physiology of amphibians, ed. W. Hanke, 287–309. Stuttgart: Gustav Fisher Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Bouwman, A.F., and D.P. van Vuuren. 1999. Global assessment of acidification and eutrophication of natural ecosystems. RIVM report 402001 012 (Research for man and environment; National Institute of Public Health and the Environment), Bilthoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Busenberg, E., and L.N. Plummer. 1987. pH measurement of low-conductivity waters. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-resources investigations Report 87–4060.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, K.L., and R.J. Hall. 1985. Effects of elevated hydrogen ion and aluminium concentrations on the survival of amphibian embryos and larvae. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cushman, S. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128: 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dolmen, D. 1987. Hazards to Norwegian amphibians. In Proceedings of the 4th Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Nijmegen 1987, ed. J.J. van Gelder, H. Strijbosch, and P.J.M. Bergers, 119–122. Nijmegen: Catholic University (Faculty of Sciences).Google Scholar
  19. Dolmen, D. 1996. Damfrosk, Rana lessonae Camerano, oppdaget i Norge. Fauna (Oslo) 49: 178–180. (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  20. Dolmen, D. 2010. Amfibier og reptiler. Amphibia and Reptilia. In Norsk rødliste for arter 2010. The 2010 Norwegian red list for species, ed. J.A. Kålås, Å. Viken, S. Henriksen, and S. Skjelseth, 413–417. Trondheim (Norway): Artsdatabanken.Google Scholar
  21. Dolmen, D., J.K. Skei, and I. Blakar. 2008. Scandinavian amphibians: Their aquatic habitat and tolerance to acidic water—a field study. Fauna norvegica 26: 15–29.Google Scholar
  22. Dunson, W.A., R.L. Wyman, and E.S. Corbett. 1992. A symposium on amphibian declines and habitat acidification. Journal of Herpetology 26: 349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elvingson, P., and C. Ågren. 2004. Air and the environment. Göteborg: The Swedish NGO Secretariat on Acid Rain.Google Scholar
  24. EPA. 2012. Amphibians and reptiles. Use as indicators. Water: Monitoring and assessments. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved March 17, 2014, from http://water.epa.gov/type/wetlands/assessment/herps.cfm.
  25. Fedorenkova, A., J.A. Vonk, H.J.R. Lenders, R.C.M. Cremers, A.M. Breure, and A.J. Hendriks. 2012. Ranking ecological risks of multiple chemical stressors on amphibians. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 31: 1416–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freda, J. 1991. The effects of aluminium and other metals on amphibians. Environmental Pollution 71: 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. GAA. 2014. Key findings on threat status and distribution of all amphibians known to science. Global amphibian assessment. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.pacificbio.org/initiatives/ESIN/News/global_amphibian_assessment.htm.
  28. Galloway, J.N. 1995. Acid deposition: Perspectives in time and space. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 85: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gardner, T. 2001. Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon in conservation biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24: 25–44.Google Scholar
  30. Garmo, Ø.A., B.L. Skjelkvåle, H.A. de Wit, L. Colombo, C. Curtis, J. Fölster, A. Hoffmann, J. Hruška, et al. 2014. Trends in surface water chemistry in acidified areas in Europe and North America from 1990 to 2008. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 225: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-1880-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gensemer, R.W., and R.C. Playle. 1999. The bioavailability and toxicity of aluminium in aquatic environments. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 29: 315–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glos, J., T.U. Grafe, M.-O. Rödel, and K.E. Linsenmair. 2003. Geographic variation in pH tolerance of two populations of the European common frog, Rana temporaria. Copeia 2003: 650–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hagström, T. 1981. Reproductive strategy and success of amphibians in water acidified by atmospheric pollution. In Proceedings of the European Herpetological Symposium at Cotswold Wild Life Park, Oxford 1980, ed. J. Coborn, 55–57 pp. Oxford: Cotswold Wild Life Park.Google Scholar
  34. Freckleton, R.P. 2002. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: Regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 542–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grueber, C.E., S. Nakagawa, R.J. Laws, and I.G. Jamieson. 2011. Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haines, T.A. 1981. Acid precipitation and its consequences for aquatic ecosystems: A review. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110: 669–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hangartner, S., A. Laurila, and K. Räsänen. 2011. Adaptive divergence of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) along an acidification gradient. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 366. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henriksen, A. 1979. A simple approach for identifying and measuring acidification of freshwater. Nature 278: 542–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henriksen, A., L. Lien, T.S. Traaen, I.S. Sevaldrud, and D.F. Brekke. 1988. Lake acidification in Norway—present and predicted chemical status. Ambio 17: 259–266.Google Scholar
  40. Hesthagen, T., I.H. Sevaldrud, and H.M. Berger. 1999. Assessment of damage to fish populations in Norwegian lakes due to acidification. Ambio 28: 112–117.Google Scholar
  41. Hopkins, W.A. 2007. Amphibians as models for studying environmental change. ILAR Journal 48: 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ICE. 2014. Declining Amphibian Population Task Force (DAPTF). INFORMATION Center for the Environment (ICE), University of California. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://ice.ucdavis.edu/project/daptf.
  43. IUCN. 2013. Amphibians. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2013.2. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/amphibians.
  44. Klimont, Z., S.J. Smith, and J. Cofala. 2013. The last decade of global anthropogenic sulfur dioxide: 2000-2011 emissions. Environmental Research Letters 8: 014003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lehtinen, R.M., S.M. Galatowitsch, and J.R. Tester. 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leuven, R.S.E.W., C. den Hartog, M.M.C. Christiaans, and W.H.C. Hijligers. 1986. Effects of water acidification on the distribution and the reproductive success of amphibians. Experientia 42: 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levy, M.A. 1995. International co-operation to combat acid rain. In Green globe yearbook of international co-operation on environment and development 1995, ed. H.O. Bergesen, G. Parmann, and Ø.B. Thommessen, 59–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lippestad, H. 2014. Meteorologisk instituttets historie. Norwegian Meteorological Institute. Retrieved March 11, 2014, from http://www.met.no/Om_oss/Instituttets_historie (In Norwegian).
  49. Mason, J. 1989. Introduction The causes and consequences of surface water acidification. In Acid toxicity and aquatic animals, ed. R. Morris, E.W. Taylor, D.J.A. Brown, and J.A. Brown, 1–12., (Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series 34) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Moldan, F., B.J. Cosby, and R.F. Wright. 2013. Modeling past and future acidification of Swedish lakes. Ambio 42: 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0360-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Persson, M., K. Räsänen, A. Laurila, and J. Merilä. 2007. Maternally determined adaptation to acidity in Rana arvalis: Are laboratory and field estimates of embryonic stress tolerance congruent? Canadian Journal of Zoology 85: 832–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pierce, B.A. 1993. The effects of acid precipitation on amphibians. Ecotoxicology 2: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. R Core Team 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved August 14, 2017, from https://www.R-project.org/.
  54. Skei, J.K., D. Dolmen, L. Rønning, and T.H. Ringsby. 2006. Habitat use during the aquatic phase of the newts Triturus vulgaris (L.) and T. cristatus (Laurenti) in central Norway: proposition for a conservation and monitoring area. Amphibia-Reptilia 27: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stoddard, J.L., D.S. Jeffries, A. Lükeviler, T.A. Clair, P.J. Dillon, C.T. Driscoll, M. Forsius, M. Johannessen, et al. 1999. Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe. Nature 401: 575–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Strand, L.Å. 2002. Reproduksjon hos amfibier i vann med ekstreme pH-verdier. (Breeding in amphibians in waters with extreme pH-values.). Fauna-Oslo 55: 108–114. (In Norwegian, English summary).Google Scholar
  57. Stuart, S., J.S. Chanson, N.A. Cox, B.E. Young, A.S.L. Rodrigues, D.L. Fishman, and R.W. Waller. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Su, S., B. Li, S. Cui, and S. Tao. 2011. Sulfur dioxide emissions from combustion in China: From 1990 to 2007. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 8403–8410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vos, C.C., and J.P. Chardon. 1998. Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wells, K.D. 2007. The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyNTNU University MuseumTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Skei Biomangfold KonsultSkatvalNorway

Personalised recommendations