Skip to main content

A spatial evaluation of historic iron mining impacts on current impaired waters in Lake Superior’s Mesabi Range

Abstract

This paper examines the water quality legacies of historic and current iron mining in the Mesabi Range, the most productive iron range in the history of North America, producing more than 42% of the world’s iron ore in the 1950s. Between 1893 and 2016, 3.5 × 109 t of iron ore were shipped from the Mesabi Range to steel plants throughout the world. We map historic sites and quantities of iron mining, ore processing, water use, and tailings deposition within subwatershed boundaries. We then map the locations of impaired lakes within HUC-12 subwatershed boundaries within the Mesabi Range, using government datasets created for US federal Clean Water Act reporting. Comparing watersheds with and without historic mining activity, watersheds with historic mining activity currently contain a greater percentage of impaired lakes than control watersheds within the same range. These results suggest that historic iron ore mining and processing in the Mesabi Range affected water quality on a landscape scale, and these legacies persist long after the mines have closed. This paper outlines a novel spatial approach that land managers and policy makers can apply to other landscapes to assess the effects of past mining activity on watershed health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Agency, Minnesota Pollution Control. 2008. Appendix A: Impaired Waters and TMDL Fact Sheets and Maps. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. 2016. Guidance Manuel for Assessing the Quality of Minnesota Surface Waters for Determination of Impairment: 305(b) Report and 303(d) List. 2016 Assessment and Listing Cycle.

  • Anderson, P., and I. Martin. 2015. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP): Lake Water Quality Sampling. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., W. Bouchard, D. Chrisopherson, and M. Feist. 2014. Guidance Manual for Assessing the Quality of Minnesota’s Surface Waters for Determination of Impairment: 305(b) Report and 303(d) List. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam, P., K. Andersson, M. Isacson, D.V. Gavrilov, R. Axelsson, M. Bäckström, E. Degerman, M. Elbakidze, et al. 2013. Learning about the history of landscape use for the future: Consequences for ecological and social systems in Swedish Bergslagen. Ambio 42: 146–159. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0369-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axler, R., C. Larsen, C. Tikkanen, M. McDonald, S. Yokom, and P. Aas. 1996. Water quality issues associated with aquaculture: A case study in mine pit lakes. Water Environment Research 68: 995–1011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Axler, Richard, S. Yokom, C. Tikkanen, M. McDonald, H. Runke, D. Wilcox, and B. Cady. 1998. Restoration of a Mine Pit lake from aquacultural nutrient enrichment. Restoration Ecology 6: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, J., N. Langston, and D. Lafreniere. 2016. A geospatial approach to uncovering the hidden waste footprint of Lake Superior’s Mesabi Iron Range. The Extractive Industries and Society 3: 1031–1045. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E.S., B.D. Lutz, R.S. King, J.P. Fay, C.E. Carter, A.M. Helton, D. Campagna, and J. Amos. 2012. How many mountains can we mine? Assessing the regional degradation of central appalachian rivers by surface coal mining. Environmental Science and Technology 46: 8115–8122. doi:10.1021/es301144q.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G. 2016. The influence of the scale of mining activity and mine site remediation on the contamination legacy of historical metal mining activity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23: 23456–23466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braungardt, C.B., E.P. Achterberg, F. Elbaz-Poulichet, and N.H. Morley. 2003. Metal geochemistry in a mine-polluted estuarine system in Spain. Applied Geochemistry 18: 1757–1771. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(03)00079-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, P., P.J. Wood, and I. Reid. 2012. The impairment of river systems by metal mine contamination: A review including remediation options. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 42: 2017–2077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, D.S., R.J. Currie, D.J. Soucek, H.A. Latimer, and G.C. Trent. 2001. An integrative assessment of a watershed impacted by abandoned mined land discharges. Environmental Pollution 111: 377–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Church, S.E., P. von Guerrard, and S.E. Finger. 2007. Integrated Investigations of Environmental Effects of Historical Mining in the Animas River Watershed, San Juan County, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1651.

  • Clifford, J. 2017. West Ham and the River Lea: A Social and Environmental History of London’s Industrialized Marshland, 1839–1914. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, A., and I. Given. 1973. SME Mining Engineering Handbook, vol. 2. New York: Society of Mining Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunfer, G. 2008. Scaling the dust bowl. In Placing History: How Maps, Spatial Data, and GIS are Changing Historical Scholarship, ed. A.K. Knowles, 95–122. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E.W. 1964. Pioneering with Taconite. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, J. 1953. Iron ore. In Minerals yearbook metals and minerals. Bureau of mines. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosbois, C., M. Meybeck, L. Lestel, I. Lefevre, and F. Moatar. 2012. Severe and contrasted polymetallic contamination patterns (1900–2009) in the Loire River sediments (France). Science of the Total Environment 435: 290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, M., D. Brown, A. Cunningham, J. Dykes, S. Hautaniemi Leonard, J. Little, J. Mikecz, P. Rhode, et al. 2016. Migration in the 1930s: Beyond the dust bowl. Social Science History 40: 707–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanak, E., J. Lund, A. Dinar, B. Gray, R. Howitt, J. Mount, P. Moyle, and B. Thompson. 2011. Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunch, S., and A. MacDonald. 2011. The environmental legacy of historic mining activities in the Almond River catchment, Scotland. In Mine WaterManaging the Challenges. Aachen, Germany.

  • Haunch, S. 2013. Legacy of historic mining and water quality in a heavily mined Scottish river catchment. PhD thesis, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

  • Hubbard, J. 1948. Spiral concentration. Mining World 13: 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Edwards, K. 2016. Tackling mine wastes. Science 352: 288–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Edwards, K., M. Macklin, and M. Taylor. 1997. Historic metal mining inputs to Tess river sediment. The Science of the Total Environment 194: 437–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunerlach, M.P., J.J. Rytuba, and C.N. Alpers. 1999. Mercury contamination from hydraulic placer-gold mining in the Dutch Flat Mining District, California. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4018B, pp. 179–189.

  • Hunt, M. 1951. Taconite: Iron ore bonanza. Steelways, Iron and Steel Institute.

  • Impaired Lakes. 2012. Minnesota Geospatial Commons (version Shapefile). St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iron Ore Concentrating Plants of Minnesota. 1920. Skillings’ Mining Review, September 4.

  • Isenberg, A. 2005. Mining California: An Ecological History. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L.A., and W.A. Marcus. 2006. The human role in changing fluvial systems: Retrospect, inventory and prospect. Geomorphology 79: 152–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.B., and K. Hallberg. 2005. Acid mine drainage remediation options: A review. Science of the Total Environment 338: 3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling, A., and J. Sandlos. 2015. Mining and communities in Northern Canada: History, politics, and memory. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, C., and R. Specht. 1958. The mining of taconite, lake superior iron mining district. Geographical Review 48: 528–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakes and water quality. 2017. Government. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

  • Langston, N. 2017. Sustaining Lake Superior. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeCain, T. 2009. Mass Destruction: The Men and Giant Mines that Wired America and Scared the Planet. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClerc, E., and Y. Wiersma. 2017. Assessing post-industrial land cover change at the Pine Point Mine, NWT, Canada using multi-temporal Landsat analysis and landscape metrics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189: 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LiDAR Elevation, Arrowhead Region, NE Minnesota, 2011. Shape and File GeoDataBase. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Davis, Kellogg & Severance Law Firm Records.

  • LiDAR Elevation, Central Lakes Region, Minnesota, 2012. Shape and File GeoDataBase. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

  • Limerick, P.N., J.N. Ryan, T.R. Brown, and T.A. Comp. 2005. Cleaning up abandoned hardrock mines in the west: Prospecting for a better future. Report from the Center #7, Center of the American West, University of Colorado at Boulder, 47 pp.

  • MacFarlane, D. 2016. Waukesha and great lakes water: some historical background. NiCHE: Network in Canadian History & Environment. http://niche-canada.org/2016/06/22/waukesha-and-great-lakes-water-some-historical-background/.

  • MacKenzie, A.B., and I.D. Pulford. 2002. Investigation of contaminant metal dispersal from a disused mine site at Tyndrum, Scotland, using concentration gradients and stable Pb isotope ratios. Applied Geochemistry 17: 1093–1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, M.G., K.A. Hudson-Edwards, and E.J. Dawson. 1997. The significance of pollution from historic metal mining in the Pennine orefields on river sediment contaminant fluxes to the North Sea. Science of the Total Environment 194: 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, J.T. 2015. Taconite Dreams: The Struggle to Sustain Mining on Minnesota’s Iron Range, 1915–2000. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGarvey, D.J., and J.M. Johnston. 2013. “Fishing” for alternatives to mountaintop mining in Southern West Virginia. Ambio 42: 298–308. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0346-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. 1997. The role of fluvial geomorphic processes in the dispersal of heavy metals from mine sites. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 58: 101–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mineland Reclamation: Minnesota’s Program. 1988. Division of Lands and Minerals. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

  • Mineral Resources Data System. 2005. Shape and File GeoDataBase. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota’s Impaired Waters List. 2017. Government. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

  • Moore, J.N., and H.W. Langer. 2012. Can a river heal itself? Natural attenuation of metal contamination in river sediment. Environmental Science and Technology 46: 2616–2623.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.N., and S.N. Luoma. 1990. Hazardous wastes from large-scale metal extraction. Environmental Science and Technology 24: 1278–1285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mud from Brazil dam disaster is toxic, UN says, despite mine operator denials. 2015. The Guardian, November 25.

  • Muskie, E. 1972. Clean Water Act. 40 C.F.R.

  • Pellicori, D.A., C.H. Gammons, and S.R. Poulson. 2005. Geochemistry and stable isotope composition of the Berkeley pit lake and surrounding mine waters, Butte, Montana. Applied Geochemistry 20: 2116–2137. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.07.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plumlee, G.S., R.A. Morton, T.P. Boyle, J.H. Medlin, and J.A. Centeno. 2000. An Overview of Mining-Related Environmental and Human Health Issues, Marinduque Island, Philippines: Observations from a Joint US Geological Survey-Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Reconnaissance Field Evaluation, May 12–19, 2000. US Geological Survey Open-File Report.

  • Quivik, F. 1998. Smoke and tailings: An environmental history of copper smelting technologies in Montana, 1880–1930. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Ross, M.R., B.L. McGlynn, and E.S. Bernhardt. 2016. Deep impact: Effects of mountaintop mining on surface topography, bedrock structure, and downstream waters. Environmental Science and Technology 50: 2064–2074.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, K., D. Bird, and R. Ashley. 2010. Legacy of the California gold rush: Environmental geochemistry of arsenic in the southern Mother Lode Gold District. International Geology Review 42: 385–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaber, P., P. Kapinos, and G. Knapp. 1994. Hydrologic Unit Maps. United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294. U.S. Department of the Interior.

  • Singer, M.B., R. Aalto, L.A. James, N. Kilham, J. Higson, and S. Ghoshal. 2013. Enduring legacy of a toxic fan via episodic redistribution of California gold mining debris. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 18436–18441. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206191109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. 2014. Tainted Earth: Smelters, Public Health, and the Environment. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surface Mining: Complete Reconciliation of the Abandoned Mine Land Fund Needed. 1988. GAO/RCED-89-35. Government Accountability Office.

  • Taggart, A. 1927. Handbook of Ore Dressing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Resource Document: Extraction and Beneficiation of Ores and Minerals. 1994. EPA 530-R-94-030. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Surface Waste.

  • The 8, 10, and 12 hydrologic unit boundaries for Minnesota. 2008. Vector Digital Data. Mounds View, MN: USGS.

  • The Lake Superior District. 1920. The Iron Trade Review 66.

  • Thomas, M.A., C.H. Conaway, D.J. Steding, M. Marvin-DiPasquale, K.E. Abu-Saba, and A.R. Flegal. 2002. Mercury contamination from historic mining in water and sediment, Guadalupe River and San Francisco Bay, California. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 2: 211–217.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Allen, N., and D. Lafreniere. 2016. Rebuilding the landscape of the rural post office: A geo spatial analysis of the 19th century postal space and networks. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 3: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Barneveld, C.E. 1913. Iron Mining in Minnesota. Minnesota School of Mines Experiment Station Bulletin 1. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

  • Walker, S.R., H.E. Jamieson, A. Lanzirotti, G.E.M. Hall, and R.C. Peterson. 2015. The effect of ore roasting on arsenic oxidation state and solid phase speciation in gold mine tailings. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 15: 273–291.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Water Quality: Describing Water Quality. 2017. Government. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/whaf/about/5-component/wq_concepts.html. Accessed 25 July 2017.

  • Water Quality Standards. 2017. Government. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/water-quality-standards. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.

  • Wernstedt, K., and R. Hersh. 2010. Abandoned Hardrock Mines in the United States: Escape from a Regulatory Impasse. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 1: 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, R., D. Neil, D. Brereton, and D. Mulligan. 2009. Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 1426–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). ESRI Shape and File GeoDataBase. USGS and USDA-NRCS.

  • Yellishetty, M., P.G. Ranjith, and A. Tharumarajah. 2010. Iron ore and steel production trends and material flows in the world: Is this really sustainable? Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54: 1084–1094. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. 1932. Elements of Mining. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younger, P., and C. Wolkersdorfer. 2004. Mining impacts on fresh water environment: Technical and managerial guidelines for catchment scale management. ERMITE Report: D6, The European Commission Fifth Framework Programme, Energy Environment and Sustainable Development.

  • Zellie, C. 2005. Mesabi Iron Range Historic Contexts, Itasca and St. Louis Counties, Minnesota Phase III Mitigation Study TH 169. St. Paul, MN: Federal Highway Administration and Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant #R56645, Toxic Mobilizations in Iron Mining Contamination). The authors thank Kelley Christensen at Michigan Tech for helpful feedback and support. We thank the anonymous reviewers who provided invaluable feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We also thank the MPCA for providing watershed datasets to the public.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Baeten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baeten, J., Langston, N. & Lafreniere, D. A spatial evaluation of historic iron mining impacts on current impaired waters in Lake Superior’s Mesabi Range. Ambio 47, 231–244 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0948-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0948-0

Keywords

  • Environmental history
  • Geospatial analysis
  • Historical geographic information systems (HGIS)
  • Historical mining
  • Iron mining