Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 46, Issue 7, pp 812–824 | Cite as

Changing and partially successful local institutions for harvest of thatch palm leaves

  • Anders H. Sirén
Report

Abstract

In some cases, users of common-pool resources (CPR) successfully govern and manage these for collective benefit but in other cases they fail to do so. When evaluating the success of local institutions for CPR management, however, researchers have not always clearly distinguished between success in terms of compliance and endurance, and success in terms of the socio-economic and environmental outcomes of the management. This study focused on the governance and management of wayuri palms (Pholidostachys synanthera robusta), whose leaves are harvested for roof thatch, in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Combining ethnographic methods with field botanic inventory, it was shown that although local institutions regulating leaf harvest had existed for longer than living memory, and the degree of compliance was high, they did not prevent exhaustion of the resource base, only delayed it.

Keywords

Amazonia Common-pool resources Indigenous Pholidostachys synanthera Sustainability Tropical rainforest 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was made while I was funded through a three-year project grant provided by the Kone Foundation to professor Risto Kalliola in 2010 as part of its special call for research on the significance of biodiversity. Manuscript writing was partly carried out while I was funded by the Prometeo Project of the Secretariat for Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SENESCYT) of the Republic of Ecuador. Gonzalo Malaver, Angel Gualinga, Adám Aranda, Isidro Tuti, Virgilio Jipa,and José Castillo assisted with field data collection. My deep gratitude goes to all the members of the communities where the field work was carried out, who kindly permitted, facilitated, and participated in the research activities. Rommel Montúfar, Matti Salo, and Paola Minoia read and provided important feedback to earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. 2002. Common resources and institutional sustainability. In The drama of the Commons, ed. National Research Council, 41–86. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. 2014. Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: Some concluding thoughts. Environmental Science & Policy 36: 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baland, J.M., and J.P. Platteau. 1996. Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities?. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berge, E., and F. Van Laerhoven. 2011. Governing the Commons for two decades: A complex story. International Journal of the Commons 5: 160–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvo-Irabién, L.M., M.T. Zapata, and S. Iriarte-Vivar. 2009. Effects of leaf harvest on Thrinax radiata palm: Implications for management and conservation. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 21: 34–44.Google Scholar
  7. Castello, L., J.P. Viana, G. Watkins, M. Pinedo-Vasquez, and V.A. Luzadis. 2009. Lessons from integrating fishers of arapaima in small-scale fisheries management at the Mamirauá Reserve, Amazon. Environmental Management 43: 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S.V. Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. In Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy, ed. D.H. Cole, and M.D. McGinnis, 249–280. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  9. Delgado, C., and K. Mejía. 2012. Harvest of Palmiche (Pholidostachys synanthera) by communities in the Peruvian Amazon. Palms 56: 183–187.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, M.J., M.J. Hilsenroth, and J. Weinberger. 2009. A primer on meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: The relationship between patient-reported therapeutic alliance and adult attachment style as an illustration. Psychotherapy Research 19: 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Endress, B.A., D.L. Gorchov, and E.J. Berry. 2006. Sustainability of a non-timber forest product: Effects of alternative leaf harvest practices over 6 years on yield and demography of the palm Chamaedorea radicalis. Forest Ecology and Management 234: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernández-Llamazares, Á., I. Díaz-Reviriego, M. Guèze, M. Cabeza, A. Pyhälä, and V. Reyes-García. 2016. Local perceptions as a guide for the sustainable management of natural resources: Empirical evidence from a small-scale society in Bolivian Amazonia. Ecology and Society 21: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, C., M. Bozigar, and R. Bilsborrow. 2015. Declining use of wild resources by indigenous peoples of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Biological Conservation 182: 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greif, A., and C. Kingston. 2011. Institutions: Rules or equilibria? In Political economy of institutions, democracy and voting, ed. N. Schofield, and G. Caballero, 13–43. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henderson, A. 2012. A revision of Pholidostachys (Arecaceae). Phytotaxa 43: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodgson, G.M. 2006. What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues 11: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lent, J., J.C. Hernández-Barrios, N.P. Anten, and M. Martínez-Ramos. 2014. Defoliation effects on seed dispersal and seedling recruitment in a tropical rain forest understorey palm. Journal of Ecology 102: 709–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. López-Toledo, L., C. Horn, and B.A. Endress. 2011. Distribution and population patterns of the threatened palm Brahea aculeata in a tropical dry forest in Sonora, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 1901–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. López-Toledo, L., N.P. Anten, B.A. Endress, D.D. Ackerly, and M. Martínez-Ramos. 2012. Resilience to chronic defoliation in a dioecious understorey tropical rain forest palm. Journal of Ecology 100: 1245–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montúfar, R., F. Anthelme, J.C. Pintaud, and H. Balslev. 2011. Disturbance and resilience in tropical American palm populations and communities. The Botanical Review 77: 426–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morrow, C.E., and R.W. Hull. 1996. Donor-initiated common pool resource institutions: The case of the Yanesha forestry cooperative. World Development 24: 1641–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moxnes, E. 2000. Not only the tragedy of the commons: Misperceptions of feedback and policies for sustainable development. System Dynamics Review 16: 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Navarro, J.A., G. Galeano, and R. Bernal. 2011. Impact of leaf harvest on populations of Lepidocaryum tenue, an Amazonian understory palm used for thatching. Tropical Conservation Science 4: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ostrom, E. 1986. An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostrom, E. 2010. Institutional analysis and development: Elements of the framework in historical perspective. Historical Developments and Theoretical Approaches in Sociology 2: 261–288.Google Scholar
  28. Quinn, C.H., M. Huby, H. Kiwasila, and J.C. Lovett. 2007. Design principles and common pool resource management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania. Journal of Environmental Management 84: 100–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salo, M., A. Sirén, and R. Kalliola. 2014. Diagnosing wild species harvest: Resource use and conservation. Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sarker, A., and T. Itoh. 2001. Design principles in long-enduring institutions of Japanese irrigation common pool resources. Agricultural Water Management 48: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sirén, A. 2004. Changing interactions between humans and nature in Sarayaku, Ecuadorian Amazon. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae: Agraria 447. http://diss-epsilon.slu.se/archive/00000498/.
  32. Sirén, A.H. 2006. Natural resources in indigenous peoples’ land in Amazonia: A tragedy of the commons? The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 13: 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sirén, A. 2014. History of natural resource use and environmental impacts in an interfluvial upland forest area in western Amazonia. Fennia 192: 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sirén, A.H., and J.D. Machoa. 2008. Fish, wildlife, and human nutrition in tropical forests: A fat gap? Interciencia 33: 186–193.Google Scholar
  35. Sirén, A., and K. Parvinen. 2015. A spatial bioeconomic model of the harvest of wild plants and animals. Ecological Economics 116: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sirén, A.H., R. Montufar, and J. Gualinga. 2013. Palma de wayuri. (The wayuri palm). In Palmas Ecuatorianas: biología y usos sostenibles [Ecuadorian Palms: Biology and sustainable use], ed. R. Valencia, R. Montúfar, H. Navarrete, and H. Balslev, 135–143. Quito: Publicaciones del Herbario de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.Google Scholar
  37. Vasco, C., and A. Sirén. 2016. Correlates of wildlife hunting in indigenous communities in the Pastaza province. Ecuadorian Amazonia. Animal Conservation. doi: 10.1111/acv.12259.Google Scholar
  38. Wade, R. 1988. Village republics (No. 40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Zabel, A., and K. Holm-Müller. 2008. Conservation performance payments for carnivore conservation in Sweden. Conservation Biology 22: 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geosciences and GeographyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Inti Anka TaripayPuyoEcuador

Personalised recommendations