Hunting or habitat? Drivers of waterbird abundance and community structure in agricultural wetlands of southern India
- 256 Downloads
The relative impacts of hunting and habitat on waterbird community were studied in agricultural wetlands of southern India. We surveyed wetlands to document waterbird community, and interviewed hunters to document hunting intensity, targeted species, and the motivations for hunting. Our results show that hunting leads to drastic declines in waterbird diversity and numbers, and skew the community towards smaller species. Hunting intensity, water spread, and vegetation cover were the three most important determinants of waterbird abundance and community structure. Species richness, density of piscivorous species, and medium-sized species (31–65 cm) were most affected by hunting. Out of 53 species recorded, 47 were hunted, with a preference for larger birds. Although illegal, hunting has increased in recent years and is driven by market demand. This challenges the widely held belief that waterbird hunting in India is a low intensity, subsistence activity, and undermines the importance of agricultural wetlands in waterbird conservation.
KeywordsAvifauna Community structure Illegal hunting Tamil Nadu Waterbird
The authors thank the Department of Science and Technology (DST) (Government of India), the International Crane Foundation (ICF) (via Program SarusScape), the Nature Conservation Foundation (NCF) (via the Cranes and Wetlands Programme) and the Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning (FERAL) for supporting this project through the National Center for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Center for Wildlife Studies (CWS) and Wildlife Conservation Society – India Program (WCS – India). The authors further thank J. Ratnam and N. Lakshminarayanan for commenting on an earlier draft of the manuscript; and C. Gurusrikar for providing administrative support. The authors also thank four anonymous reviewers for providing us feedback to improve the manuscript. The assistance provided by H.R. Arun, S.A. Varsha, A N. Joshi, B.B. Shetty, S. Kishore, B. Nandan, D. Naveen, B.V. Nitesh, S. Izlancherian, S. Sivakumar, V. Babu, and V. Raj is gratefully acknowledged.
- Ali, S., and D. Ripley. 1987. Compact handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan—together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Alldredge, M.W., K.H. Pollock, and T.R. Simons. 2006. Estimating detection probabilities from multiple-observer point counts. The Auk 123: 1172–1182. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[1172:EDPFMP]2.0.CO;2.
- Amat, J.A., M.A. Rendón, M. Rendón-Martos, A. Garrido, and J.M. Ramírez. 2005. Ranging behaviour of greater flamingos during the breeding and post-breeding periods: Linking connectivity to biological processes. Biological Conservation 125: 183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.02.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brander, A.D. 1923. Wild animals of central India. Delhi: Natraj.Google Scholar
- Chimalakonda, D. B. 2012. Ecological and anthropogenic covariates influencing diversity of waterbirds of a wetland complex in an agriculture dominated landscape. M.Sc Thesis. Mumbai, India:Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.Google Scholar
- Diamond, J.M. 1989. Overview of recent extinctions. In Conservation for the twenty-first century, ed. D. Western, and M. Pearl, 37–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dudgeon, D., A.H. Arthington, M.O. Gessner, Z.-I. Kawabata, D.J. Knowler, C. Lévêque, R.J. Naiman, A.-H. Prieur-Richard, et al. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81: 163–182. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gadgil, M., and F. Berkes. 1991. Traditional resource management systems. In Rights to nature: Ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment, ed. S. Hanna, C. Folke, and K.-G. Maler, 127–141. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Gee, E. 1964. Wildlife of India. London: Collins.Google Scholar
- Hoyer, M.V.M., and D.E. DE Canfield. 1994. Bird abundance and species richness on Florida lakes: influence of trophic status, lake morphology, and aquatic macrophytes. In Aquatic birds in the trophic web of lakes, ed. J.J. Kerekes, 107–119. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-1128-7_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kamins, A.O., O. Restif, Y. Ntiamoa-Baidu, R. Suu-Ire, D.T.S. Hayman, A.A. Cunningham, J.L.N. Wood, and J.M. Rowcliffe. 2011. Uncovering the fruit bat bushmeat commodity chain and the true extent of fruit bat hunting in Ghana, West Africa. Biological Conservation 144: 3000–3008. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kumar, A., and B. Wright. 1998. Fashioned for extinction: An expose of the shahtoosh trade. Delhi: Wildlife Protection Society of India.Google Scholar
- Madhusudan, M.D., and U. Karanth. 2002. Local hunting and the conservation of large mammals in India. Ambio 31: 49–54. doi: 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0049:LHATCO]2.0.CO;2.
- Menon, V., R. Sukumar, and A. Kumar. 1997. A god in distress: Threats of poaching and the ivory trade to the Asian elephant in India. Delhi: Wildlife Protection Society of India.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Robinson, J.G., and E.L. Bennett. 2000. Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Robinson, J.G., and K.H. Redford. 1991. Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Sankhala, K. 1978. The story of the Indian tiger. London: Collins.Google Scholar
- Schaller, G.B. 2009. The deer and the tiger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Singh, K. 1998. Status of waterfowl in Asia with special reference to India. Indian forester 124: 794–802.Google Scholar
- Space Applications Centre, and Indian Space Research Organisation. 2011. National Wetland Atlas—India. Ahmedabad: Indian Space Research Organisation.Google Scholar
- The World Bank, W. D. I. 2014. GNI per capita, 4–7. Atlas method: Atlas method. GNI per capita.Google Scholar
- Thomas, L., S.T. Buckland, E.A. Rexstad, J.L. Laake, S. Strindberg, S.L. Hedley, J.R.B. Bishop, T.A. Marques, et al. 2010. Distance software: Design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 5–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson, W.L. 2002. Towards Reliable Bird Surveys: Accounting for individuals present but not detected. The Auk 119: 18–25. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0018:TRBSAF]2.0.CO;2.
- Winter, M., D.H. Johnson, J.A. Shaffer, T.M. Donovan, and D.W. Svedarsky. 2006. Patch size and landscape effects on density and nesting success of grassland birds. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 158–172. doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[158:PSALEO]2.0.CO;2.