Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 706–716 | Cite as

Distal impacts of aquarium trade: Exploring the emerging sandhopper (Orchestoidea tuberculata) artisanal shore gathering fishery in Chile

  • Sebastián Tapia-Lewin
  • Karina Vergara
  • Christian De La Barra
  • Natalio Godoy
  • Juan Carlos Castilla
  • Stefan Gelcich
Report

Abstract

Artisanal fishery activities support the livelihoods of millions of people worldwide, particularly in developing countries. Within these fisheries, distal global drivers can promote switching between alternative target resources. These drivers can promote the rapid development of new, unregulated and previously unexploited fisheries that pose a threat to the sustainability of ecosystems. In this paper, we describe a new artisanal shore gathering activity that targets a previously unexploited resource: the sandhopper (Orchestoidea tuberculata). The activity is driven by aquarium trade demand for food. We used mixed methods to describe the activity, assessed basic socio-economic incentives, and estimated Catches per Unit Effort. Results show that the sandhopper plays an important role for the livelihoods of shore gatherers engaged in the activity. Gatherers have adapted and developed two main extraction methods with different degrees of investment and extraction rates. Furthermore, gatherers have developed local knowledge regarding the ecology and management of the resource. Results show that economic incentives can motivate a rapid expansion of this unregulated activity. Future research gaps and management options to address the development of this fishery are discussed in light of these findings.

Keywords

Adaptive capacity Fishery specialization Gleaning New fishery resource Social–ecological system Telecoupling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank gatherers who contributed their knowledge on the new gathering activity. We thank Becas Chile: Doctorado en el extranjero 2015, Fondecyt PostDoctorado N° 3150138, Financiamiento Basal FB 0002, Nucleo-Milenio Initiatives P10-033 and NC-120086 from the Ministerio de Economía, Fondecyt 1160145, Latin American Fisheries Fellowship, The Walton Family Foundation and The Pew Marine Conservation Fellowship Programs. We also thank Verónica Ortiz and Leonardo Peralta. We acknowledge Sara-Katherine Coxon and Rick Thomas for their help in editing the manuscript. Authors acknowledge two anonymous reviewers and Professor Omar Defeo for their comments and contributions that deeply improved the quality of this paper. The opinions represented in this paper are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their host institutions.

References

  1. ADUANAS CHILE. 2015. Importation registries. Retrieved 1 February, 2016 from http://datos.gob.cl/dataset/registros-de-importacion-2015. Specific Data requested February 2016.
  2. Allison, E.H., and F. Ellis. 2001. The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 25: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araos, F. 2006. Going to the shore: An ethnographic approximation to shore gatherers of Cardenal Caro Region. Social Anthroplogist Title Thesis. Santiago, Chile: University of Chile (In spanish).Google Scholar
  4. Araos, F. 2015. Living on the shore: Algae gathering in the central coast of Chile. Espacio Regional Revista de Estudios Sociales 2: 137–151. (In Spanish, English summary).Google Scholar
  5. Arena, G., L. Barea, and O. Defeo. 1994. Theoretical evaluation of trap capture for stock assessment. Fisheries Research 19: 349–362. doi: 10.1016/0165-7836(94)90049-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baessolo, L., J. Pérez-Schultheiis, A. Arriagada, C. Suazo, and M. Castro. 2010. New records of Orchestoidea tuberculata Nicolet 1849 (Amphipoda, Talitridae), from the coast of Chile. Hidrobiologica 20: 191–193.Google Scholar
  7. Berkes, F.J. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621–630. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262. doi: 10.2307/2641280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botto, F., and O. Iribarne. 1999. Effects of the burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulata (Dana) on the benthic community of a SW Atlantic coastal lagoon. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 241: 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castilla, J.C., and O. Defeo. 2001. Latin American benthic shellfisheries: Emphasis on co-management and experimental practices. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castilla, J.C., and O. Defeo. 2005. Paradigm shifts needed for world fisheries. Science 309: 1324c–2325c. doi: 10.1126/science.309.5739.1324c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro, M., C. Suazo, E. Quiroga, L. Baessolo, A. Arriagada, and G.D. Santos-Pavletic. 2009. Diet selection of Sanderlings (Calidris alba) in Isla Guamblin national park in the Chilean fjords. Ornitologia Neotropical 20: 247–253.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, C.W., and G.P. Kirkwood. 1986. On uncertain renewable resource stocks: Optimal harvest policies and the value of stock surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13: 235–244. doi: 10.1016/0095-0696(86)90024-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, F.P.A., W.C. Valenti, and R. Calado. 2013. Traceability issues in the trade of marine ornamental species. Reviews in Fisheries Science 21: 98–111. doi: 10.1080/10641262.2012.760522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Contreras, H., C. Duarte, E. Jaramillo, and N. Fuentes. 2013. Morphometric variability in sandy beach crustaceans of Isla Grande de Chiloé, Southern Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografia 48: 487–496. doi: 10.4067/S0718-19572013000300007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dee, L.E., S.S. Horii, and D.J. Thornhill. 2014. Conservation and management of ornamental coral reef wildlife: Successes, shortcomings, and future directions. Biological Conservation 169: 225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Defeo, O., and J.C. Castilla. 1998. Harvesting and economic patterns in the artisanal Octopus mimus (Cephalopoda) fishery in a northern Chile cove. Fisheries Research 38: 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Defeo, O., and A. McLachlan. 2005. Patterns, processes and regulatory mechanisms in sandy beach macrofauna: A multiscale analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295: 1–20. doi: 10.3354/meps295001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Defeo, O., A. McLachlan, D.S. Schoeman, T.A. Schlacher, J. Dugan, A. Jones, M. Lastra, and F. Scapini. 2009. Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duarte, C., K. Acuña, J.M. Navarro, I. Gómez, E. Jaramillo, and P. Quijón. 2014. Variable feeding behavior in Orchestoidea tuberculata (Nicolet 1849): Exploring the relative importance of macroalgal traits. Journal of Sea Research 87: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2013.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duarte, C., E. Jaramillo, H. Contreras, K. Acuña, and J.M. Navarro. 2009. Importance of macroalgae subsidy on the abundance and population biology of the amphipod Orchestoidea tuberculata (Nicolet) in sandy beaches of south central Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 44: 691–702. (In Spanish, English summary).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duarte, C., E. Jaramillo, H. Contreras, and K. Acuña. 2010. Cannibalism and food availability in the talitrid amphipod Orchestoidea tuberculata. Journal of Sea Research 64: 417–421. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2010.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freire, J., and A. García-Allut. 2000. Socioeconomic and biological causes of management failures in European artisanal fisheries: The case of Galicia (NW Spain). Marine Policy 24: 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fujita, R., D.J. Thornhill, K. Karr, C.H. Cooper, and L.E. Dee. 2014. Assessing and managing data-limited ornamental fisheries in coral reefs. Fish and Fisheries 15: 661–675. doi: 10.1111/faf.12040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gelcich, S. 2014. Towards polycentric governance of small-scale fisheries: insights from the new ‘Management Plans’ policy in Chile. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 24: 575–581. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelcich, S., J. Cinner, C.J. Donlan, S. Tapia-Lewin, N. Godoy, and J.C. Castilla. 2017. Fishers’ perceptions on the Chilean coastal TURF system after two decades: Problems, benefits, and emerging needs. Bulletin of Marine Science 93: 53–67. doi: 10.5343/bms.2015.1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gelcich, S., G. Edwards-Jones, M.J. Kaiser, and J.C. Castilla. 2006. Co-management policy can reduce resilience in traditionally managed marine ecosystems. Ecosystems 9: 951–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gelcich, S., R. Guzman, C. Rodriguez-Sickert, J.C. Castilla, and J.C. Cárdenas. 2013. Exploring external validity of common pool resource experiments: Insights from artisanal benthic fisheries in Chile. Ecology and Society 18: 2. doi: 10.5751/ES-05598-180302.
  29. Gelcich, S., T.P. Hughes, P. Olsson, C. Folke, O. Defeo, M. Fernández, S. Foale, L.H. Gunderson, et al. 2010. Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 16794–16799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Godoy, N., S. Gelcich, J.C. Castilla, M. Lima, and A. Smith. 2016. Artisanal spearfishery in temperate nearshore ecosystems of Chile: Exploring the catch composition, revenue, and management needs. Marine and Coastal Fisheries 8: 436–447. doi: 10.1080/19425120.2016.1185062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gómez, J., and O. Defeo. 1999. Life history of the sandhopper Pseudorchestoidea brasiliensis (Amphipoda) in sandy beaches with contrasting morphodynamics. Marine Ecology Progress Series 182: 209–220. doi: 10.3354/meps182209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gutiérrez, N., A. Masello, G. Uscundun, and O. Defeo. 2011. Spatial distribution patterns in biomass and population structure of the deep sea red crab Chaceon notialis in the Southwestern Atlantic. Ocean Fisheries Research 110: 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Häussermann, V., and G. Försterra. 2009. Marine benthic fauna of Chilean Patagonia. Santiago: Nature in Focus.Google Scholar
  34. Hilborn, R., and C.J. Walters. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 2: 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaramillo, E., R. De la Huz, C. Duarte, and H. Contreras. 2000. Algal wrack deposits and macroinfaunal arthropods on sandy beaches of the Chilean coast. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 79: 337–351.Google Scholar
  36. Jaramillo, E., W. Stotz, C. Bertran, J. Navarro, C. Roman, and C. Varela. 1980. Locomotor Activity of Orchestoidea tuberculata (Amphipoda, Talitridae) on the surface of a sandy beach of southern Chile (Mehuín, Valdivia Province). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 15: 9–33. doi: 10.1080/01650528009360561. (In Spanish, English summary).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kennedy, F., E. Naylor, and E. Jaramillo. 2000. Ontogenetic differences in the circadian locomotor activity rhythm of the talitrid amphipod crustacean Orchestoidea tuberculata. Marine Biology 137: 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lima, M., A. Brazeiro, and O. Defeo. 2000. Population dynamics of the yellow clam Mesodesma mactroides: recruitment variability, density-dependence and stochastic processes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 207: 97–108. doi: 10.3354/meps207097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Macneil, C., J.T.A. Dick, and W. Elwood. 1999. The dynamics of predation on Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Biological Reviews 74: 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McClanahan, T.R., J.C. Castilla, A.T. White, and O. Defeo. 2009. Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 19: 33–47. doi: 10.1007/s11160-008-9088-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McLachlan, A., E. Jaramillo, T.E. Doon, and F. Wessels. 1993. Sandy beach macrofauna communities and their control by the physical environment: A geographical comparison. Journal of Coastal Research 15: 27–38.Google Scholar
  42. Naylor, E., and F. Kennedy. 2003. Ontogeny of behavioural adaptations in beach crustaceans: some temporal considerations for integrated coastal zone management and conservation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58S: 169–175. doi: 10.1016/s02727714(03)00033-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Orensanz, J.M., A.M. Parma, G. Jerez, N. Barahona, M. Montecinos, and I. Elias. 2005. What are the key elements for the sustainability of “S-Fisheries”? Insights from South America. Bulletin of Marine Science 76: 527–556.Google Scholar
  44. Recasens, S. A. 2003. People of the sea: Ethnographic tales. Santiago, Chile: Departamento de Antropología. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  45. Rubec, P.J., F. Cruz, V. Pratt, R. Oeller, B. McCullough, and F. Lallo. 2000. Cyanide-free net-caught fish for the marine aquarium trade. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3: 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salas, S., U.R. Rashid, and T. Pitcher. 2004. Short-term decisions of small-scale fishers selecting alternative target species: A choice model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 374–383. doi: 10.1139/F04-007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. SERNAPESCA. 2012. Anuarios Estadísticos de Pesca 2012, series cronológicas 2002-20012. Retrieved 2 November, 2015 from https://www.sernapesca.cl/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=246&func=startdown&id=7669.
  48. SERNAPESCA. 2014. Anuarios Estadísticos de Pesca 2014, series cronológicas 2004-201. Retrieved 1 March, 2016 from https://www.sernapesca.cl/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=246&func=fileinfo&id=12418. Specific data requested March 2016.
  49. Schwerdtner Manez, K., L. Dandava, and W. Ekau. 2014. Fishing the last frontier: The introduction of the marine aquarium trade and its impact on local fishing communities in Papua New Guinea. Marine Policy 44: 279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shuman, C.S., G. Hodgson, and R.F. Ambrose. 2005. Population impacts of collecting sea anemones and anemonefish for the marine aquarium trade in the Philippines. Coral Reefs 24: 564–573. doi: 10.1007/s00338-005-0027-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tamaki, A., and B. Ingole. 1993. Distribution of juvenile and adult ghost shrimps Callianassa japonica Ortmann (Thalassinidea), on an intertidal sand flat: intraspecific facilitation as a possible pattern-generating factor. Journal of Crustacean Biology 13: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tissot, B.N., and L.E. Hallacher. 2003. Effects of aquarium collectors on reef fishes in Kona, Hawai‘i. Conservation Biology 17: 1759–1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thornhill, D.J. 2012. Ecological impacts and practices of the Coral Reef Wildlife Trade. Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.Google Scholar
  54. van den Heiligenberg, T. 1986. Effects of mechanical and manual harvesting of lugworms Arenicola marina on the benthic fauna of tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Biological Conservation 39: 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitfield, P.E., J.A. Hare, A.W. David, S.L. Harter, R.C. Muñoz, and C.M. Addison. 2007. Abundance estimates of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans/miles complex in the Western North Atlantic. Biological Invasions 9: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastián Tapia-Lewin
    • 2
    • 1
  • Karina Vergara
    • 1
  • Christian De La Barra
    • 3
  • Natalio Godoy
    • 1
    • 4
  • Juan Carlos Castilla
    • 1
  • Stefan Gelcich
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES) and Centro de Conservación Marina, Departamento de Ecologia, Facultad de Ciencias BiológicasPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, 2400 Bren Hall University of California, Santa BarbaraCAUSA
  3. 3.Dirección Regional de Pesca de la Región del Libertador Bernardo O’HigginsServicio Nacional de PescaPichilemuChile
  4. 4.The Nature ConservancySantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations