Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 604–612 | Cite as

Attitudes toward jaguars and pumas and the acceptability of killing big cats in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: An application of the Potential for Conflict Index2

  • Monica T. Engel
  • Jerry J. Vaske
  • Alistair J. Bath
  • Silvio Marchini
Report

Abstract

We explored the overall acceptability of killing jaguars and pumas in different scenarios of people–big cat interactions, the influence of attitudes toward big cats on acceptability, and the level of consensus on the responses. Data were obtained from 326 self-administered questionnaires in areas adjacent to Intervales State Park and Alto Ribeira State Park. Overall, people held slightly positive attitudes toward jaguars and pumas and viewed the killing of big cats as unacceptable. However, individuals that held negative attitudes were more accepting of killing. As the severity of people–big cat interactions increased, the level of consensus decreased. Knowing whether killing a big cat is acceptable or unacceptable in specific situations allows managers to anticipate conflict and avoid illegal killing of big cats.

Keywords

Ecological corridors Human–wildlife conflict Panthera onca Protected areas Puma concolor Wildlife 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Beisiegel and R. Bergamaschi for field assistance. We thank Chester Zoo’s Act for Wildlife for financial support of this research. We are also grateful to all the residents of Iporanga and Ribeirao Grande who shared with us their insights and time.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. 2002. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altrichter, M., G. Boaglio, and P. Perovic. 2006. The decline of jaguars Panthera onca in the Argentine Chaco. Oryx 40: 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruskotter, J.T., J.J. Vaske, and R.H. Schmidt. 2009. Social and cognitive correlates of Utah residents’ acceptance of the lethal control of wolves. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruskotter, J.T., and R.S. Wilson. 2014. Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conservation Letters 7: 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carvalho Jr., E.A.R., and J.C.B. Pezzuti. 2010. Hunting of jaguars and pumas in the Tapajos-Arapiuns Extractive Reserve, Brazilian Amazonia. Oryx 44: 610–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho Jr., E.A.R., and R.G. Morato. 2013. Factors affecting big cat hunting in Brazilian protected areas. Tropical Conservation Science 6: 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cella, E.M., E.C.M. Parsons, and L.L. Rockwood. 2016. Non-governmental organizations and governmental agencies lead in cultivating sea turtle conservation attitudes. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 21: 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conforti, V.A., and F.C.C. Azevedo. 2003. Local perceptions of jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor) in the Iguaçu National Park area, south Brazil. Biological Conservation 111: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, L.P., Y.L.R. Leite, S.L. Mendes, and A.D. Ditchfield. 2005. Mammal conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology 19: 672–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronbach, L.J., and R.J. Schavelson. 2003. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Education and Psychological Measurements 64: 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickman, A., S. Marchini, and M.J. Manfredo. 2013. The human dimensions in addressing conflict with large carnivores. In Key topics in conservation biology, 2nd ed, ed. D.W. Macdonald, and K.J. Willis, 110–126. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desbiez, A., R.C. Paula, and S. Cavalcanti. 2013. Action Plan for jaguar conservation in Brazil: Population viability analyses and environmental adequability. Endangered species series. Brasilia: ICMBio. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  13. Engel, M.T., J.J. Vaske, A.J. Bath, and S. Marchini. 2016. Predicting acceptability of jaguars and pumas in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 21: 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank, B., A. Monaco, and A.J. Bath. 2015. Beyond standard wildlife management: a pathway to encompass human dimension findings in wild boar management. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank, J., M. Johansson, and A. Flykt. 2014. Public attitude towards the implementation of management actions aimed at reducing human fear of brown bears and wolves. Wildlife Biology 21: 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hiller, T.L., J.E. McFadden-Hiller, S.R. Jenkins, J.L. Belant, and A.J. Tyre. 2015. Demography, prey abundance, and management affect number of cougar mortalities associated with livestock conflicts. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79: 978–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IUCN. 2008. Panthera onca. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. 2015.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 06 June 2015.
  18. Jacobs, M.H., J.J. Vaske, and S. Dubois. 2014. More than fear: Role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of wolves. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60: 589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jedrzejewski, W., M. Abarca, A. Viloria, H. Cerda, D. Lew, H. Takiff, E. Abadia, P. Velozo, et al. 2011. Jaguar conservation in Venezuela against the backdrop of current knowledge on its biology and evolution. Interciencia 36: 954–966.Google Scholar
  20. Krymkowski, D.H., R.E. Manning, and W.A. Valliere. 2009. Norm crystallization: Measurement and comparative analysis. Leisure Sciences 31: 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, F., W.J. McShea, D.L. Garshelis, X. Zhu, D. Wang, and L. Shao. 2011. Human-wildlife conflicts influence attitudes but not necessarily behaviours: factors driving the poaching of bears in China. Biological Conservation 144: 538–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loveridge, A.J., S.W. Wang, L.G. Frank, and J. Seidensticker. 2010. People and wild felids: Conservation of cats and management of conflicts. In Biology and conservation of wild felids, ed. D.W. Macdonald, and A.J. Loveridge, 161–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Machado, A.B.M., G.M. Drummond, and A.P. Paglia. 2008. Red book of the endangered Brazilian fauna. Brasilia: MMA/Fundação Biodiversitas (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  24. Manfredo, M.J., H.C. Zinn, L. Sikorowski, and J. Jones. 1998. Public acceptance of mountain lion management: A case study of Denver, Colorado, and nearby foothills areas. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 964–970.Google Scholar
  25. Manfredo, M.J., T.L. Teel, and A.D. Bright. 2004. Application of the concepts of values and attitudes in human dimensions of natural resources research. In Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge, ed. M.J. Manfredo, J.J. Vaske, B.L. Bruyere, D.R. Field, and P.J. Brown, 271–282. Jefferson: Modern Litho.Google Scholar
  26. Manfredo, M.J. 2008. Who cares about wildlife? Social science concepts for exploring human-wildlife relationships and conservation issues. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Manning, R.E. 2011. Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marchini, S., and D.W. Macdonald. 2012. Predicting ranchers’ intention to kill jaguars: Case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal. Biological Conservation 147: 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matoso, A.Q., K. Pisciotta, M.I.A. de Barros, J.L.C. Maia, and S.F. Lorejan. 2008. Carlos Botelho management Plan, Sao Paulo.Google Scholar
  30. Miotto, R.A., M. Cervini, R.A. Begotti, and P.M. Galetti Jr. 2010. Monitoring a puma (Puma concolor) population in a fragmented landscape in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 44: 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmeira, F.B.L., and W. Barella. 2007. Conflicts caused by domestic animals attacked by large felids in quilombolas communities in the Atlantic Forest. Biota Neotropica 7: 120–128. (in Portuguese, English summary).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmeira, F.B.L., C.T. Trinca, and C.M. Haddadd. 2015. Livestock predation by Puma (Puma concolor) in the highlands of a southeastern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Environmental Management 56: 903–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paviolo, A., C. de Angelo, K.M.P.M.B. Ferraz, R.G. Morato, J.M. Pardo, A.C. Srbek-Araujo, B.M. Beisiegel, F. Lima, et al. 2016. A biodiversity hotspot losing its top predator: The challenge of jaguar conservation in the Atlantic Forest of South America. Science 6: 3714.Google Scholar
  34. Porfirio, G., P. Sarmento, S. Leal, and C. Fonseca. 2016. How is the jaguar Panthera onca perceived by local communities along the Paraguai river in the Brazilian Pantanal? Oryx 50: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poudyal, N.C., R.L. Moore, and T.M. Young. 2015. Public attitudes toward regulatory and incentive approaches to private forests: An assessment and comparison of resident Segments in Georgia, USA. Forestry Science 61: 1088–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabinowitz, A., and K. Zeller. 2010. A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca. Biological Conservation 143: 939–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ribeiro, M.C., J.P. Metzger, A.C. Martensen, F.J. Ponzoni, and M.M. Hirota. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 142: 1141–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson, H.S., R. Desimone, C. Hartway, J.A. Gude, M.J. Thompson, M.S. Mitchell, and M. Hebblewhite. 2014. A test of the compensatory mortality hypotheses in mountain lions: A management experiment in West-Central Montana. The Journal of Wildlife Management 78: 791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanderson, E.W., K.H. Redford, C.L.B. Chetkiewicz, R.A. Medellin, A.R. Rabinowitz, J.G. Robinson, and A.A. Taber. 2002. Planning to save a species: The Jaguars as a model. Conservation Biology 16: 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Santos, F.R., A.T.A. Jácomo, and L. Silveira. 2008. Humans and jaguars in five Brazilian biomes: Same country, different perceptions. CAT News 4: 21–25.Google Scholar
  41. Soto-Shoender, J.R., and M.B. Main. 2013. Differences in stakeholder perceptions of the jaguars (Panthera onca), and puma (Puma concolor) in the tropical lowlands of Guatemala. Oryx 47: 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sponarski, C.C., J.J. Vaske, and A.J. Bath. 2015. Differences in management action acceptability for coyotes in a National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9999: 1–9.Google Scholar
  43. Thornton, C., and M.S. Quinn. 2010. Risk perceptions and attitudes toward Cougars in the Southern Foothills of Alberta. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15: 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vaske, J.J. 2008. Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Vaske, J.J., J. Beaman, H. Barreto, and L.B. Shelby. 2010. An extension and further validation of the Potential for Conflict Index. Leisure Sciences 32: 240–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaske, J.J., and M.J. Manfredo. 2012. Social psychological considerations in wildlife management. In Human dimension of wildlife management, ed. D.J. Decker, S.J. Riley, and W.F. Siemer, 43–57. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vaske, J.J., L.M. Heesemann, D.K. Loomis, and S.C. Cottrell. 2013. Measuring variability in encounter norms among scuba divers and snorkelers: An application of the Potential for Conflict Index2. Tourism in Marine Environments 9: 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodroffe, R., and J.R. Ginsberg. 1998. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280: 2126–2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zeller, K. 2007. Jaguars in the new millennium data set update: The state of the jaguar in 2006. USA: Wildlife Conservation Society.Google Scholar
  50. Zimmermann, A., M.J. Walpole, and N. Leader-Williams. 2005. Cattle ranchers’ attitudes to conflicts with jaguar (Panthera onca) in the Pantanal of Brazil. Oryx 39: 406–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica T. Engel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jerry J. Vaske
    • 3
  • Alistair J. Bath
    • 1
  • Silvio Marchini
    • 4
  1. 1.Geography DepartmentMemorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.Mammalian Ecology LabUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos SinosSão LeopoldoBrazil
  3. 3.Human Dimensions of Natural ResourcesColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  4. 4.Forest Science Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of AgricultureUniversity of São PauloPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations