The sustainability of changes in agricultural technology: The carbon, economic and labour implications of mechanisation and synthetic fertiliser use
- 454 Downloads
New agricultural technologies bring multiple impacts which are hard to predict. Two changes taking place in Indian agriculture are a transition from bullocks to tractors and an associated replacement of manure with synthetic fertilisers. This paper uses primary data to model social, environmental and economic impacts of these transitions in South India. It compares ploughing by bullocks or tractors and the provision of nitrogen from manure or synthetic urea for irrigated rice from the greenhouse gas (GHG), economic and labour perspective. Tractors plough nine times faster than bullocks, use substantially less labour, with no significant difference in GHG emissions. Tractors are twice as costly as bullocks yet remain more popular to hire. The GHG emissions from manure-N paddy are 30 % higher than for urea-N, largely due to the organic matter in manure driving methane emissions. Labour use is significantly higher for manure, and the gender balance is more equal. Manure is substantially more expensive as a source of nutrients compared to synthetic nutrients, yet remains popular when available. This paper demonstrates the need to take a broad approach to analysing the sustainability impacts of new technologies, as trade-offs between different metrics are common.
KeywordsPaddy Oxen India Draught animals Livelihoods Life cycle assessment LCA
The author would like to thank the constructive comments from four anonymous reviewers. With thanks to the ESRC/Dfid Joint Scheme award RES-167-25-MTRUYG0; ES/1033768/1 for funding. The views expressed are those of the authors.
- Astill, G.G., and J. Langdon. 1997. Medieval farming and technology: The impact of agricultural change in Northwest Europe. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
- Carswell, G., and G. De Neve. 2014. MGNREGA in Tamil Nadu: A story of success and transformation? Journal of Agrarian Change 14: 564–585.Google Scholar
- CIDS. 2014. State of Indian farmers: A report centre for the study of developing societies.Google Scholar
- Corbridge, S., J. Harriss, and C. Jeffrey. 2014. ‘Lopsided’, ‘Failed’, or ‘Tortuous’: India’s problematic transition and its implications for labour. In China-India: Paths of economic and social development, ed. D. Davin, and B. Harriss-White. Oxford: The British Academy by Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- CSE. 2009. Green rating project, fertilizers. http://www.cseindia.org/userfiles/79-90%20Fertilizer%281%29.pdf, New Delhi.
- CSE. 2012. Into the furnace. Green rating project of Indian Iron and Steel Sector. In ed. CSE, 256. Delhi: CSE.Google Scholar
- Dawe, D. 2000. The contribution of rice research to poverty alleviation. In Studies in plant science, ed. Sheehy P.L.M.J.E., and B. Hardy. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- EU. 2009. On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. In ed. Official Journal of the European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=Oj:L:2009:140:0016:0062:en:PDF.
- European Commission. 2010. International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook, general guide for life cycle assessment. Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.Google Scholar
- Evenson, R.E., C. Pray, and M.W. Rosegrant. 1998. Agricultural research and productivity growth in India. International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2005. Fertilizer use by crop in India. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- Forster, P., V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D.W. Fahey, J. Haywood, J. Lean, D.C. Lowe, G. Myhre, J. Nganga, R. Prinn, G. Raga, M. Schulz, and R. Van Dorland. 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, ed. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller, 131–234. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- GoI. 2012. 19th livestock census. In Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying & Fisheries Ministry of Agriculture. Government of India.Google Scholar
- GoI. 2013. India rural development report 2012|13. In ed. Ministry of Rural Development. Government of India, http://rural.nic.in/sites/downloads/annual-report/MoRDEnglish_AR2012_13.pdf.
- GOI. 2014. All India report on number and area of operational holdings. Agriculture Census Division, Department of Agriculture & Co-Operation.Google Scholar
- Harriss-White, B., and N. Gooptu. 2000. Mapping India’s world of unorganised labour. In Working classes: Global realities, ed. L. Panitch, and C. Leys, 89–118. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
- Harriss-White, B., S. Janakarajan, and D. Colatei. 2004. Heavy agriculture and light industry in South Indian villages. In Rural india facing the 21st Century: Essays on long term change and recent development policy, ed. B. Harriss-White, and S. Janakarajan, 3–47. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
- Hull, K. 2009. Understanding the relationship between economic growth, employment and poverty reduction. In ed. DAC Network on Poverty Reduction (POVNET). Promoting pro-poor growth: Employment OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dac/povertyreduction/43514554.pdf.
- IPCC. 1996. IPCC good practice guidance and uncertainties management in national greenhouse gas inventories.Google Scholar
- IPCC. 2006. National guidelines for greenhouse gas inventories.Google Scholar
- IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of workgroup I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- ISO. 2006. Environment management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. EN ISO 14040 2006. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).Google Scholar
- Deere, J. 2012. Tractor specifications. http://www.deere.com/en_IN/home_page/ag_home/products/5104_45HP/5104_45HP.html.
- Kindred, D., N. Mortimer, R. Sylvester-Bradley, G. Brown, and J. Woods. 2008. Understanding and managing uncertainties to improve biofuel GHG emissions calculations. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
- Ladha, J.K., H. Pathak, T.J. Krupnik, J. Six, and C. van Kessel. 2005. Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: Retrospects and prospects. In Advances in agronomy, ed. L.S. Donald, 85–156. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Mahindra. 2012. Tractor specifications. http://www.mahindratractorworld.com/Bangladesh-en/Products-Tractors-MKM-NBP-SERIES-30-50HP/575-DI-MKM-NBP-45HP.
- Misra, A.K., and A.S. Pandey. 2000. Seasonality of bullock power use in rainfed areas. Draught Animal News 32: 11–13.Google Scholar
- Montgomery, D.R. 2012. Dirt: The erosion of civilizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Musa, H.L., and S.T. Bello. 1993. Research and development of draught animal power utilisation in West Africa. In ed. FAO. http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ilri/x5483b/x5483b1s.htm, http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ilri/x5483b/x5483b1s.htm.
- Pearson, A. 1991. Animal power: matching beast and burden. Appropriate Technology 18: 11–14.Google Scholar
- Rahmann, G. 2011. Biodiversity and organic farming: What do we know? vTI Agriculture and Forestry Research 3: 189–208.Google Scholar
- Rotz, C.A. 2004. Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. Journal of Animal Science 82: E119–E137.Google Scholar
- Sarkar, A. 2013. Tractor production and sales in India, 1989–2009. Review of Agrarian Studies 3.Google Scholar
- Sarma, J.S. 1981. Growth and equity: Policies and implementation in Indian agriculture. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Schramski, J.R., K.L. Jacobsen, T.W. Smith, M.A. Williams, and T.M. Thompson. 2013. Energy as a potential systems-level indicator of sustainability in organic agriculture: Case study model of a diversified, organic vegetable production system. Ecological Modelling 267: 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh, R.S. 2013. Custom hiring and scope of entrepreneurship development in farm machinery. AMA 44: 26–32.Google Scholar
- Starkey, P. 2010. Livestock for traction: World trends, key issues and policy implications. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- Teleni, E., R. Campbell, and D. Hoffmann. 1993. Draught animal systems and management: An Indonesian study. Canberra: ACIAR.Google Scholar
- Tennakoon, N.A., and S.D. Bandara. 2003. Nutrient content of some locally available organic materials and their potential as alternative sources of nutrients for coconut. COCOS 15: 23–30.Google Scholar
- Thomas, C.K. 2000. The role of draught cattle and buffaloes in sustainable agriculture in India. Draught Animal News 33: 4–11.Google Scholar
- Wood, S., and A. Cowie. 2004. A review of greenhouse gas emission factors for fertiliser production. Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting, Research and Development Division, State Forests of New South Wales, Beecroft, NSW, Australia. http://www.ieabioenergy-task38.org/publications/GHG_Emission_Fertilizer%20Production_July2004.pdf.