International trade causes large net economic losses in tropical countries via the destruction of ecosystem services
Despite the large implications of the use of tropical land for exports (“land absorption”) on ecosystem services (ES) and global biodiversity conservation, the magnitude of these externalities is not known. We quantify the net value of ES lost in tropical countries as a result of cropland, forestland and pastureland absorption for exports after deducting ES gains through imports (“land displacement”). We find that net ES gains occur only in 7 out of the 41 countries and regions considered. We estimate global annual net losses of over 1.7 x 1012 international dollars (I$) (I$1.1 x 1012 if carbon-related services are not considered). After deducting the benefits from agricultural, forest and livestock rents in land replacing tropical forests, the net annual losses are I$1.3 and I$0.7 x 1012, respectively. The results highlight the large magnitude of tropical ES losses through international trade that are not compensated by the rents of land uses in absorbed land.
KeywordsConservation planning Ecological footprint analysis International trade Tropical deforestation Under-priced exports
- Brown, K., and D.W. Pearce. 1994. The causes of tropical deforestation: The economic and statistical analysis of factors giving rise to the loss of the tropical forests. Canada: UBC Press.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2010. CPI Inflation Calculator. United States Department of Labor. http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl.
- Chomitz, K., and T. Thomas. 2001. Geographic patterns of land use and land intensity in the Brazilian Amazon. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2687.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2013. The impact of EU consumption on deforestation: Comprehensive analysis of the impact of EU consumption on deforestation, 1–98. Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Ewing, B., A. Reed, S. Rizk, A. Galli, M. Wackernagel, and J. Kitzes. 2008. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprints Accounts, Version 1.1. Global Footprint: Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2010a. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/342/default.aspx.
- FAO. 2010b. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/.
- FAO. 2014. Livestock densities. Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Animal Production and Health. Accessed from http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/resources/en/glw/glw_dens.html.
- Giam, X., L. Mani, L.P. Koh, and H.T.W. Tan. 2015. Saving tropical forests by knowing what we consume. Conservation Letters. doi:10.1111/conl.12209.
- Hertel, T.W. 1997. Global trade analysis: Modeling and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hertel, T.W., N. Ramankutty, and U.L.C. Baldos. 2014. Global market integration increases likelihood that a future African Green Revolution could increase crop land use and CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 13799–13804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Paoli, G.D., B. Yaap, P.L. Wells, and A. Sileuw. 2010. CSR, oil palm and the RSPO: Translating boardroom philosophy into conservation action on the ground. Tropical Conservation Science 3: 438–446.Google Scholar
- Ramankutty, N. 2012. Global cropland and pasture data from 1700–2007. Accessed from http://www.geog.mcgill.ca/~nramankutty/Datasets/Datasets.html.
- Ricardo, D. 1817. On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
- Sandker, M., A. Suwarno, and B.M. Campbell. 2007. Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecology and Society 12: 37.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. 1976. The wealth of nations. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2012. Development and Globalization 2012: Facts and figures. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
- Wackernagel, M., and W. Rees. 1995. Our ecological footprint. Philadelphia: New Society.Google Scholar
- WHO. 2010. Purchasing Power Parity 2005. World Health Organization. CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). Accessed May 2010, from http://www.who.int/choice/costs/ppp/en/index.html.