Skip to main content

Philippine protected areas are not meeting the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness requirements of Aichi Target 11

Abstract

Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity urges, inter alia, that nations protect at least 17 % of their land, and that protection is effective and targets areas of importance for biodiversity. Five years before reporting on Aichi targets is due, we assessed the Philippines’ current protected area system for biodiversity coverage, appropriateness of management regimes and capacity to deliver protection. Although protected estate already covers 11 % of the Philippines’ land area, 64 % of its key biodiversity areas (KBAs) remain unprotected. Few protected areas have appropriate management and governance infrastructures, funding streams, management plans and capacity, and a serious mismatch exists between protected area land zonation regimes and conservation needs of key species. For the Philippines to meet the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness elements of Aichi Target 11, protected area and KBA boundaries should be aligned, management systems reformed to pursue biodiversity-led targets and effective management capacity created.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ambal, R.G.R., M.V. Duya, M.A. Cruz, O.G. Coroza, S.G. Vergara, N. de Silva, N. Molinyawe, and B. Tabaranza. 2012. key biodiversity areas in the Philippines: Priorities for conservation. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4: 2788–2796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 2012. Action plan for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas: Philippines. Submitted to the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity on 31 May 2012. www.cbd.int/database/attachment/?id=1659. Accessed 26 March 2015.

  • Balete, D.S., P.A. Alviola, M.R.M. Duya, M.V. Duya, L.R. Heaney, and E.A. Rickart. 2011. The mammals of the Mingan Mountains, Luzon: Evidence for a new center of mammalian endemism. Fieldiana Life & Earth Sciences 2: 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, A.E., G.M. Buchanan, P.F. Donald, S.H.M. Butchart, L.D.C. Fishpool, and C. Rondinini. 2011. Poor overlap between the distribution of protected areas and globally threatened birds in Africa. Animal Conservation 14: 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International. 2012. The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world, with conservation status and taxonomic sources, 5. www.birdlife.info/im/species/checklist.zip.

  • Butchart, S.H.M., J.P.W. Scharlemann, M.I. Evans, S. Quader, S. Aricò, J. Arinaitwe, M. Balman, L.A. Bennun, et al. 2012. Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS ONE 7: e32529.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart, S.H.M., M. Clarke, R.J. Smith, R.E. Sykes, J.P.W. Scharlemann, M. Harfoot, G.M. Buchanan, A. Angulo, et al. 2015. Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters. doi:10.1111/conl.12158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, K.E., and V.G. Springer. 2005. The center of the center of marine shore fish biodiversity: The Philippine Islands. Environmental Biology of Fishes 72: 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catibog-Sinha, C.S., and L.R. Heaney. 2006. Philippine biodiversity: Principles and practice. Quezon City: Haribon Foundation for the Conservation of Natural Resources Inc. ISBN 971-93352-6-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N.E., E.H. Boakes, P.J.K. McGowan, G.M. Mace, and R.A. Fuller. 2013. Protected areas in South Asia have not prevented habitat loss: A study using historical models of land-use change. PLoS ONE 8: e65298.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collar, N.J., N.A.D. Mallari, and B.R. Tabaranza. 1999. Threatened birds of the Philippines. Manila: Bookmark Inc, in conjunction with the Haribon Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation International Philippines, Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, & Haribon Foundation. 2006. Priority sites for conservation in the Philippines: Key biodiversity areas. Quezon City: Conservation International Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, F., A.E. Jensen, P.A. Alviola, D.S. Balete, M. Mendoza, A. Tagtag, C. Custodio, and M. Enghoff. 2005. Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2633–2652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENR/UNEP. 1997. Philippine biodiversity: An assessment and action plan. Manila: Bookmark Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Española, C.P., N.J. Collar, and S.J. Marsden. 2013. Are populations of large-bodied avian frugivores on Luzon, Philippines, facing imminent collapse? Animal Conservation 16: 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.A., E. McDonald-Madden, K.A. Wilson, J. Carwardine, H.S. Grantham, J.E.M. Watson, C.J. Klein, D.C. Green, et al. 2010. Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature 466: 365–367.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiang, E.S., and G.C. Braganza. 2014. National management effectiveness and capacity assessment of protected areas in the Philippines. Manila: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C.N., and L. Joppa. 2009. Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biological Conservation 142: 2166–2174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppa, L.N., and A. Pfaff. 2009. High and far: Biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE 4: e8273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppa, L.N., and A. Pfaff. 2011. Global protected area impacts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 278: 1633–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. 2005. Improving methods for conservation-based assessments of abundance and habitat use in tropical forest birds. PhD Thesis. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University.

  • Leverington, F., K.L. Costa, H. Pavese, A. Lisle, and M. Hockings. 2010. A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallari, N.A.D. 2009. Maximising the value of ecological and socioeconomic data in support of conservation planning for key understorey bird species in Palawan, Philippines. PhD Thesis, Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University.

  • Mallari, N.A.D., B.R. Tabaranza, and M.J. Crosby. 2001. Key conservation sites in the Philippines: A Haribon Foundation & BirdLife International directory of Important Bird Areas. Makati City: Bookmark Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallari, N.A.D., M.J. Crosby, and N.J. Collar. 2004. Unexplored Philippine forests as revealed by point-locality mapping. Forktail 20: 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallari, N.A.D., N.J. Collar, D.C. Lee, P.J.K. McGowan, R. Wilkinson, and S.J. Marsden. 2011. Population densities of key understorey birds across a habitat gradient in Palawan, Philippines: Implications for conservation. Oryx 45: 234–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.R., M. Groom, G.R. Hess, T. Steelman, D.L. Stokes, J. Thompson, T. Bowman, L. Fricke, et al. 2009. Biodiversity conservation in local planning. Conservation Biology 23: 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1988. Environmental degradation and some economic consequences in the Philippines. Environmental Conservation 15: 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, P.S., L.E. Afuang, and R.G. Rosell-Ambal (eds.). 2002. Philippine biodiversity conservation priorities: A second iteration of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. Quezon City: Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, J., M. van Weerd, A.B. Masipiqueña, and G.A. Persoon. 2011. Illegal logging in the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, the Philippines. Conservation and Society 9: 202–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posa, M.R.C., A.C. Diesmos, N.S. Sodhi, and T.M. Brooks. 2008. Hope for threatened tropical biodiversity: Lessons from the Philippines. BioScience 58: 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyare, S., and J. Berger. 2003. Beyond demography and delisting: Ecological recovery for Yellowstone’s grizzly bears and wolves. Biological Conservation 113: 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickart, E.A., D.S. Balete, R.J. Rowe, and L.R. Heaney. 2011. Mammals of the northern Philippines: Tolerance for habitat disturbance and resistance to invasive species in an endemic fauna. Diversity and Distributions 17: 530–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A.S.L., S.J. Andelman, M.I. Bakarr, L. Boitani, T.M. Brooks, R.M. Cowling, L.D.C. Fishpool, G.A.B. da Fonseca, et al. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A.S.L., J.D. Pilgrim, J.F. Lamoreux, M. Hoffmann, and T.M. Brooks. 2006. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., F. Davis, R. McGhie, R.G. Wright, C. Groves, and J. Estes. 2001. Nature reserves: Do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecological Applications 11: 999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, N.S., M.R.C. Posa, T.M. Lee, D. Bickford, L.P. Koh, and B.W. Brook. 2010. The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutullo, A. 2010. Extent of the global network of terrestrial protected areas. Conservation Biology 24: 362–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stattersfield, A.J., M.J. Crosby, A.J. Long, and D.C. Wege. 1998. Endemic Bird Areas of the world: Priorities for biodiversity conservation. Cambridge: BirdLife International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolton, S., M. Hockings, N. Dudley, K. MacKinnon, and T. Whitten. 2003. Reporting progress in protected areas: A site-level management effectiveness tracking tool. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, S., B. Bettzky, N. Crawhall, N. Dudley, J.M. Londoño, K. MacKinnon, K. Redford, and T. Sandwith. 2012. Meeting Aichi target 11: What does success look like for protected area systems? Parks 18: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart J. Marsden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mallari, N.A.D., Collar, N.J., McGowan, P.J.K. et al. Philippine protected areas are not meeting the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness requirements of Aichi Target 11. Ambio 45, 313–322 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0740-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0740-y

Keywords

  • Birds
  • CBD
  • Key biodiversity areas
  • Management plans
  • Philippines