Managing invasive species is a major challenge for society. In the case of newly established invaders, rapid action is key for a successful management. Here, we develop, describe and recommend a three-step transdisciplinary process (the “butterfly model”) to rapidly initiate action for invasion management. In the framing of a case study, we present results from the first of these steps: assessing priorities and contributions of both scientists and decision makers. Both scientists and decision makers prioritise research on prevention. The available scientific knowledge contributions, however, are publications on impacts rather than prevention of the invasive species. The contribution of scientific knowledge does thus not reflect scientists’ perception of what is essentially needed. We argue that a more objective assessment and transparent communication of not only decision makers’ but also scientists’ priorities is an essential basis for a successful cooperation. Our three-step model can help achieve objectivity via transdisciplinary communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Barreteau, O., P. Bots, and K. Daniell. 2010. A framework for clarifying participation in participatory research to prevent its rejection for the wrong reasons. Ecology and Society 15.
Bayliss, H.R., G.B. Stewart, A. Wilcox, and N.P. Randall. 2013. A perceived gap between invasive species research and stakeholder priorities. NeoBiota 19: 67–82.
Bens, I. 2012. Facilitating with ease! Core skills for facilitators, team leaders and members, managers, consultants, and trainers. New York: Wiley.
Burkhardt-Holm, P., W. Giger, H. GUttinger, U. Ochsenbein, A. Peter, K. Scheurer, H. Segner, E. Staub, et al. 2005. Where have all the fish gone? Environmental Science and Technology 39: 441A–447A.
Byers, J.E., S. Reichard, J.M. Randall, I.M. Parker, C.S. Smith, W.M. Lonsdale, I.A. Atkinson, T.R. Seastedt, et al. 2002. Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conservation Biology 16: 630–640.
Chalmers, A.F. 2013. What is this thing called science?. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Collins, H.M., and R. Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32: 235–296.
Conrad, C.C., and K.G. Hilchey. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176: 273–291.
Cook, D.C., M.B. Thomas, S.A. Cunningham, D.L. Anderson, and P.J. De Barro. 2007. Predicting the economic impact of an invasive species on an ecosystem service. Ecological Applications 17: 1832–1840.
Cowling, R.M., B. Egoh, A.T. Knight, P.J. O’Farrell, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D.J. Roux, A. Welz, et al. 2008. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 9483–9488.
DAISIE. 2015. European Invasive Alien Species Gateway: 100 of the worst. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesTheWorst.do.
Davidson, A.D., and C.L. Hewitt. 2014. How often are invasion-induced ecological impacts missed? Biological Invasions 16: 1165–1173.
Defila, R., and A. Di Giulio. 2015. Integrating knowledge: Challenges raised by the “Inventory of Synthesis”. Futures 65: 123–135.
Dimond, P.E., N.E. Mandrak, and B. Brownson. 2010. Summary of the rapid response to Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in Pefferlaw Brook with an evaluation of the national rapid response framework based on the Pefferlaw Brook experience. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document 2010/036. vi + 33 p.
Drolet, D., A. Locke, M.A. Lewis, and J. Davidson. 2014. User-friendly and evidence-based tool to evaluate probability of eradication of aquatic non-indigenous species. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 1050–1056.
Edelaar, P.I., and J.L. Tella. 2012. Managing non-native species: Don′t wait until their impacts are proven. Ibis 154: 635–637.
Federal Office for the Environment Switzerland. 2015. Strategie der Schweiz zu invasiven gebietsfremden Arten, Entwurf (Strategy on invasive alien species, Draft). Retrieved October 7, 2015, from https://www.admin.ch/ch/d/gg/pc/documents/2697/Strategie-zu-invasiven-gebietsfremden-Arten_Entwurf-Strategie_de.pdf.
García-Llorente, M., B. Martín-López, P.A. Nunes, J.A. González, P. Alcorlo, and C. Montes. 2011. Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies: Eradication and prevention. Environmental Management 48: 418–435.
Genovesi, P., and C. Shine. 2004. European strategy on invasive alien species: Convention on the conservation of european wildlife and habitats (Bern Convention). Council of Europe.
Heger, T., A.T. Pahl, Z. Botta-Dukát, F. Gherardi, C. Hoppe, I. Hoste, K. Jax, L. Lindström, et al. 2013. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. Ambio 42: 527–540.
Hirsch Hadorn, G., H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp. 2008. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Berlin: Springer.
Hirsch, P.E., R. Eckmann, C. Oppelt, and J. Behrmann-Godel. 2013. Phenotypic and genetic divergence within a single whitefish form—Detecting the potential for future divergence. Evolutionary Applications 6: 1119–1132.
Hirsch, P.E., A. N’Guyen, I. Kalchhauser, and P. Burkardt-Holm. 2015. What do we really know about the impacts of one of the 100 worst invaders in Europe? A reality check. Ambio. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0718-9.
Horan, R.D., C. Perrings, F. Lupi, and E.H. Bulte. 2002. Biological pollution prevention strategies under ignorance: The case of invasive species. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84: 1303–1310.
IKSR. 2015. The Rhine. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from http://www.iksr.org/en/rhine/index.html.
Kalchhauser, I., P. Mutzner, P.E. Hirsch, and P. Burkhardt-Holm. 2013. Arrival of round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) and bighead goby Ponticola kessleri (Günther, 1861) in the High Rhine (Switzerland). BioInvasions Records 2: 79–83. doi:10.3391/bir.2013.2.1.14.
Keller, R.P., K. Frang, and D.M. Lodge. 2008. Preventing the spread of invasive species: Economic benefits of intervention guided by ecological predictions. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 22: 80–88.
Kettunen, M., P. Genovesi, S. Gollasch, S. Pagad, U. Starfinger, P. ten Brink, and C. Shine. 2009. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS). London: Institut for European Environnemental Policy (IEEP).
Kornis, M.S., S. Sharma, and J.M. Vander Zanden. 2013. Invasion success and impact of an invasive fish, round goby, in Great Lakes tributaries. Diversity and Distributions 19: 184–198.
Leung, B., D.M. Lodge, D. Finnoff, J.F. Shogren, M.A. Lewis, and G. Lamberti. 2002. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: Bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269: 2407–2413.
Lockwood, J.L., P. Cassey, and T.M. Blackburn. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 223–228.
Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D.G. Altman. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151: 264–269.
Nentwig, W. (ed.). 2007. Biological invasions. Berlin: Springer.
Ojaveer, H., and J. Kotta. 2015. Ecosystem impacts of the widespread non-indigenous species in the Baltic Sea: Literature survey evidences major limitations in knowledge. Hydrobiologia 750: 171–185.
Pickering, C., and J. Byrne. 2014. The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development 33: 534–548.
Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273–288.
Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431.
Rosendahl, J., M.A. Zanella, S. Rist, and J. Weigelt. 2015. Scientists’ situated knowledge: Strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures 65: 17–27.
Sala, O.E., F.S. Chapin, J.J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L.F. Huenneke, et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2005. Handbook of the convention on biological diversity including its Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Seidl, R., F.S. Brand, M. Stauffacher, P. Krütli, Q.B. Le, A. Spörri, G. Meylan, C. Moser, et al. 2013. Science with society in the anthropocene. Ambio 42: 5–12.
Simberloff, D. 2009. We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. Biological Invasions 11: 149–157.
Simberloff, D., J.-L. Martin, P. Genovesi, V. Maris, D.A. Wardle, J. Aronson, F. Courchamp, B. Galil, et al. 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: What’s what and the way forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 58–66.
Swiss Federal Council. 2008. Verordnung über den Umgang mit Organismen in der Umwelt [Ordinance on the Release of Organisms into the Environment]: FrSV.
Vander Zanden, J.M., and J.D. Olden. 2008. A management framework for preventing the secondary spread of aquatic invasive species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65: 1512–1522.
Vander Zanden, J.M., G.J.A. Hansen, S.N. Higgins, and M.S. Kornis. 2010. A pound of prevention, plus a pound of cure: Early detection and eradication of invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research 36: 199–205.
Vitule, J.R.S., C.A. Freire, and D. Simberloff. 2009. Introduction of non-native freshwater fish can certainly be bad. Fish and Fisheries 10: 98–108.
Walsh, J.C., L.V. Dicks, and W.J. Sutherland. 2015. The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions. Conservation Biology 29: 88–98.
We thank all workshop participants and organisers, Catherine Cornaz for assistance with the literature review, Hannes Weigt, Philipp Mayer and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This project was funded by a special grant from the Federal Office for the Environment, Switzerland, the Research Centre for Sustainable Energy and Water Supply (FoNEW), the canton BS, plus cantonal lottery funds of AG, BL, SO. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Anouk N’Guyen and Philipp E. Hirsch shared first authorship.
About this article
Cite this article
N’Guyen, A., Hirsch, P.E., Adrian-Kalchhauser, I. et al. Improving invasive species management by integrating priorities and contributions of scientists and decision makers. Ambio 45, 280–289 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0723-z
- Conservation managers
- Decision makers
- Invasive species
- Round goby
- Strong objectivity