, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 4–14 | Cite as

Pollinators, pests, and predators: Recognizing ecological trade-offs in agroecosystems

  • Manu E. SaundersEmail author
  • Rebecca K. Peisley
  • Romina Rader
  • Gary W. Luck


Ecological interactions between crops and wild animals frequently result in increases or declines in crop yield. Yet, positive and negative interactions have mostly been treated independently, owing partly to disciplinary silos in ecological and agricultural sciences. We advocate a new integrated research paradigm that explicitly recognizes cost-benefit trade-offs among animal activities and acknowledges that these activities occur within social-ecological contexts. Support for this paradigm is presented in an evidence-based conceptual model structured around five evidence statements highlighting emerging trends applicable to sustainable agriculture. The full range of benefits and costs associated with animal activities in agroecosystems cannot be quantified by focusing on single species groups, crops, or systems. Management of productive agroecosystems should sustain cycles of ecological interactions between crops and wild animals, not isolate these cycles from the system. Advancing this paradigm will therefore require integrated studies that determine net returns of animal activity in agroecosystems.


Agroecology Ecosystem services Animal–plant interactions Sustainable agriculture Cost-benefit analysis 



This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP140100709 awarded to G.W.L. All authors reviewed the literature, wrote the manuscript and approved publication. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. We thank three anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments on the manuscript.

Supplementary material

13280_2015_696_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (968 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 969 kb)


  1. Abson, D.J., E.D.G. Fraser, and T.G. Benton. 2013. Landscape diversity and the resilience of agricultural returns: A portfolio analysis of land-use patterns and economic returns from lowland agriculture. Agriculture & Food Security 2: 2. doi: 10.1186/2048-7010-2-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizen, M.A., C.L. Morales, D.P. Vázquez, L.A. Garibaldi, A. Sáez, and L.D. Harder. 2014. When mutualism goes bad: Density-dependent impacts of introduced bees on plant reproduction. New Phytologist 204: 322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altieri, M.A. 2004. Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 2: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aragona, F.B., and B. Orr. 2011. Agricultural intensification, monocultures, and economic failure: The case of onion production in the Tipajara watershed on the eastern slope of the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35: 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartomeus, I., and R. Winfree. 2011. The Circe principle: Are pollinators waylaid by attractive habitats? Current Biology 21: 652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barua, M., S.A. Bhagwat, and S. Jadhav. 2013. The hidden dimensions of human-wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation 157: 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, A.J., G.D. Bending, D. Chandler, S. Hilton, and P. Mills. 2012. Meeting the demand for crop production: The challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations. Biological Reviews 80: 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blitzer, E.J., C.F. Dormann, A. Holzschuh, A.-M. Klein, T.A. Rand, and T. Tscharntke. 2012. Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 146: 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bollinger, E.K., and J.W. Caslick. 1985. Factors influencing blackbird damage to field corn. The Journal of Wildlife Management 49: 1109–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bommarco, R., F. Miranda, H. Bylund, and C. Björkman. 2011. Insecticides suppress natural enemies and increase pest damage in cabbage. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 782–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bommarco, R., D. Kleijn, and S.G. Potts. 2013. Ecological intensification: Harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cardinale, B.J., C.T. Harvey, K. Gross, and A.R. Ives. 2003. Biodiversity and biocontrol: Emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem. Ecology Letters 6: 857–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carvalheiro, L.G., R. Veldtman, A.G. Shenkute, G.B. Tesfay, C.W.W. Pirk, J.S. Donaldson, and S.W. Nicolson. 2011. Natural and within-farmland biodiversity enhances crop productivity. Ecology Letters 14: 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavanagh, A.F., L.S. Adler, and R.V. Hazzard. 2010. Buttercup squash provides a marketable alternative to Blue Hubbard as a trap crop for control of striped cucumber beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology 39: 1953–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chagnon, M., D. Kreutzweiser, E.A.D. Mitchell, C.A. Morrissey, D.A. Noome, and J.P. Van der Sluijs. 2015. Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22: 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chakravarthy, A.K. 1988. Bird predators of pod borers of field bean (Lablab niger Medick). Tropical Pest Management 34: 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chamberlain, D.E., B.J. Hatchwell, and C.M. Perrins. 1999. Importance of feeding ecology to the reproductive success of Blackbirds Turdus merula nesting in rural habitats. Ibis 141: 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chaplin-Kramer, R., M.E. O’Rourke, E.J. Blitzer, and C. Kremen. 2011. A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecology Letters 14: 922–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Classen, A., M.K. Peters, S.W. Ferger, M. Helbig-Bonitz, J.M. Schmack, G. Maassen, M. Schleuning, E.K.V. Kalko, et al. 2014. Complementary ecosystem services provided by pest predators and pollinators increase quantity and quality of coffee yields. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281: 20133148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cunningham, S.A., S.J. Attwood, K.S. Bawa, T.G. Benton, L.M. Broadhurst, R.K. Didham, S. McIntyre, I. Perfecto, et al. 2013. To close the yield-gap while saving biodiversity will require multiple locally relevant strategies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 173: 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flynn, D.F.B., M. Gogol-Prokurat, T. Nogeire, M. Molinari, B.T. Richers, B.B. Lin, N. Simpson, M.M. Mayfield, and F. DeClerck. 2009. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecology Letters 12: 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gabarra, R., C. Castañé, and R. Albajes. 1995. The mirid bug Dicyphus tamaninii as a greenhouse whitefly and western flower thrips predator on cucumber. Biocontrol Science and Technology 5: 475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaigher, R., J.S. Pryke, and M.J. Samways. 2015. High parasitoid diversity in remnant natural vegetation, but limited spillover into the agricultural matrix in South African vineyard agroecosystems. Biological Conservation 186: 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garibaldi, L.A., I. Steffan-Dewenter, R. Winfree, M.A. Aizen, R. Bommarco, S.A. Cunningham, C. Kremen, L.G. Carvalheiro, et al. 2013. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339: 1608–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garibaldi, L.A., I. Steffan-Dewenter, C. Kremen, J.M. Morales, R. Bommarco, S.A. Cunningham, L.G. Carvalheiro, N.P. Chacoff, et al. 2011. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecology Letters 14: 1062–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gebhardt, K., A.M. Anderson, K.N. Kirkpatrick, and S.A. Shwiff. 2011. A review and synthesis of bird and rodent damage estimates to select California crops. Crop Protection 30: 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gillespie, S., R. Long, N. Seitz, and N. Williams. 2014. Insecticide use in hybrid onion seed production affects pre- and postpollination processes. Journal of Economic Entomology 107: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenleaf, S.S., and C. Kremen. 2006. Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 13890–13895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gurung, A.B. 2003. Insects—A mistake in God’s creation? Tharu farmers’ perception and knowledge of insects: A case study of Gobardiha Village Development Committee, Dang-Deukhuri. Nepal. Agriculture and Human Values 20: 337–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haaland, C., R.E. Naisbit, and L.-F. Bersier. 2011. Sown wildflower strips for insect conservation: A review. Insect Conservation and Diversity 4: 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hallmann, C.A., R.P.B. Foppen, C.A.M. van Turnhout, H. de Kroon, and E. Jongejans. 2014. Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature 511: 341–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jauker, F., F. Peter, V. Wolters, and T. Diekötter. 2012. Early reproductive benefits of mass-flowering crops to the solitary bee Osmia rufa outbalance post-flowering disadvantages. Basic and Applied Ecology 13: 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keogh, R.C., Robinson, A.P.W., Mullins, I.J. 2010. Pollination aware, Case Study 24: Paterson’s Curse. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Canberra. RIRDC Pub. No. 10/131. URL:
  34. King, L.E., I. Douglas-Hamilton, and F. Vollrath. 2011. Beehive fences as effective deterrents for crop-raiding elephants: Field trials in northern Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 49: 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krupnick, G.A., A.E. Weis, and D.R. Campbell. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomera arborea. Ecology 80: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lamarque, P., P. Meyfroidt, B. Nettier, and S. Lavorel. 2014. How ecosystem services knowledge and values influence farmers’ decision-making. PLoS One 9: e107572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luck, W.G. 2013. The net return from animal activity in agro-ecosystems: trading off benefits from ecosystem services against costs from crop damage. F1000 Research 2: 239. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-239.v1.Google Scholar
  38. Luck, G.W., S. Triplett, and P.G. Spooner. 2013. Bird use of almond plantations: Implications for conservation and production. Wildlife Research 40: 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lundin, O., H.G. Smith, M. Rundlöf, and R. Bommarco. 2013. When ecosystem services interact: Crop pollination benefits depend on the level of pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280: 20122243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mackenzie, C.A., and P. Ahabyona. 2012. Elephants in the garden: Financial and social costs of crop raiding. Ecological Economics 75: 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martins, D.J., and S.D. Johnson. 2009. Distance and quality of natural habitat influence hawkmoth pollination of cultivated papaya. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 29: 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meehan, T.D., H.M. Lease, and B.O. Wolf. 2005. Negative indirect effects of an avian insectivore on the fruit set of an insect-pollinated herb. Oikos 109: 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mothershead, K., and R.J. Marquis. 2000. Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant–pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology 81: 30–40.Google Scholar
  44. Murray, D.A.H., M.B. Clarke, and D.A. Ronning. 2013. Estimating invertebrate pest losses in six major Australian grain crops. Australian Journal of Entomology 52: 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nsibande, M.L. 1999. Sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas (L), cropping practices and perceived production constraints in Swaziland: Implications for pest management. International Journal of Pest Management 45: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rader, R., B.G. Howlett, S.A. Cunningham, D.A. Westcott, and W. Edwards. 2012. Spatial and temporal variation in pollinator effectiveness: Do unmanaged insects provide consistent pollination services to mass flowering crops? Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rand, T.A., J.M. Tylianakis, and T. Tscharntke. 2006. Spillover edge effects: The dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecology Letters 9: 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raymond, L., J.-P. Sarthou, M. Plantegenest, B. Gauffre, S. Ladet, and A. Vialatte. 2014. Immature hoverflies overwinter in cultivated fields and may significantly control aphid populations in autumn. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 185: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rundlöf, M., G.K.S. Andersson, R. Bommarco, I. Fries, V. Hederström, L. Herbertsson, O. Jonsson, B.K. Klatt, et al. 2015. Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature 521: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stewart, A.M., and J.L. Craig. 1989. Factors affecting pollinator effectiveness in Feijoa sellowiana. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 17: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suttle, K.B. 2003. Pollinators as mediators of top-down effects on plants. Ecology Letters 6: 688–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taki, H., K. Okabe, Y. Yamaura, T. Matsuura, M. Sueyoshi, S. Makino, and K. Maeto. 2010. Effects of landscape metrics on Apis and non-Apis pollinators and seed set in common buckwheat. Basic and Applied Ecology 11: 594–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tracey, J., Saunders, G. 2003. Bird damage to the wine grape industry. Report to the Bureau of Rural Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry; Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  54. Tscharntke, T., Y. Clough, T.C. Wanger, L. Jackson, I. Motzke, I. Perfecto, J. Vandermeer, and A. Whitbread. 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation 151: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ulluwishewa, R. 1992. Indigenous knowledge systems for sustainable development: The case of pest control by traditional paddy farmers in Sri Lanka. Vidvodaya Journal of Social Science 6: 79–88.Google Scholar
  56. Valera, F., R. Martín-Hernández, and M. Higes. 2011. Evaluation of large-scale dissemination of Nosema ceranae spores by European bee-eaters Merops apiaster. Environmental Microbiology 3: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Veres, A., S. Petit, C. Conord, and C. Lavigne. 2013. Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 166: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watson, S.J., G.W. Luck, P.G. Spooner, and D.M. Watson. 2013. Land-use change: Incorporating the frequency, sequence, time span, and magnitude of changes into ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 12: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weis, T. 2010. The accelerating biophysical contradictions of industrial capitalist agriculture. Journal of Agrarian Change 10: 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wenny, D.G., T.L. DeVault, M.D. Johnson, D. Kelly, C.H. Sekercioglu, D.F. Tomback, and C.J. Whelan. 2011. The need to quantify ecosystem services provided by birds. Auk 128: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manu E. Saunders
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rebecca K. Peisley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Romina Rader
    • 3
    • 4
  • Gary W. Luck
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Land Water and SocietyCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  3. 3.School of Environmental & Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Ecosystem ManagementUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations