The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions
- 690 Downloads
We develop a landscape stewardship classification which distinguishes between farmers’ understanding of landscape stewardship, their landscape values, and land management actions. Forty semi-structured interviews were conducted with small-holder (<5 acres), medium-holders (5–100 acres), and large-holders (>100 acres) in South-West Devon, UK. Thematic analysis revealed four types of stewardship understandings: (1) an environmental frame which emphasized the farmers’ role in conserving or restoring wildlife; (2) a primary production frame which emphasized the farmers’ role in taking care of primary production assets; (3) a holistic frame focusing on farmers’ role as a conservationist, primary producer, and manager of a range of landscape values, and; (4) an instrumental frame focusing on the financial benefits associated with compliance with agri-environmental schemes. We compare the landscape values and land management actions that emerged across stewardship types, and discuss the global implications of the landscape stewardship classification for the engagement of farmers in landscape management.
KeywordsConservation behavior Social values Environmental management Pro-environmental behavior Production behavior
- Bieling, C., and M. Bürgi. 2014. List and documentation of case study landscapes selected for HERCULES. EU-Project Deliverable GA No. 603447. Accessed Online 10 February, 2015, from http://www.hercules-landscapes.eu/tartalom/HERCULES_WP3_D3_1_ALUFR_final.pdf.
- Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative analysis: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Brown, G. 2012. Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal 24: 7–18.Google Scholar
- Brown, J., and B. Mitchell. 2000. The stewardship approach and its relevance for protected landscapes. The George Wright Forum 17: 70–79.Google Scholar
- DEFRA. 2014. Farm Business Survey. Data collected by Rural Business Research on behalf of, and financed by, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Accessed Online 30 May 2015, from http://www.farmbusinesssurvey.co.uk/DataBuilder/.
- Emtage, N., J. Herbohn, and S. Harrison. 2006. Landholder typologies used in the development of natural resource management programs in Australia—A review. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 13: 79–94.Google Scholar
- Fagerholm, N., and N. Käyhkö. 2009. Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia 187: 43–60.Google Scholar
- Folke, C., F.S. Chapin, and P. Olsson. 2009. Transformations in ecosystem stewardship. In Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world, 103–125. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Future Earth. 2015. About Future Earth. Accessed Online http://www.icsu.org/future-earth.
- Kofinas, G.P., and F.S. Chapin. 2009. Livelihoods and human well-being during social–ecological change. In Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world, 55–75. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Plieninger, T., T. Kizos, C. Bieling, L. Le Dû-Blayo, M.-A. Budniok, M. Bürgi, C.L. Crumley, G. Girod, P. Howard, and J. Kolen. 2015b. Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: Recent progress in European landscape research. Ecology and Society 20(2): art. 5.Google Scholar
- Plieninger, T., C. Bieling, N. Fagerholm, A. Byg, T. Hartel, P. Hurley, C.A. López-Santiago, N. Nagabhatla, E. Oteros-Rozas, C.M. Raymond, D. van der Horst, and L. Huntsinger. 2015a. The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renting, H., W.A.H. Rossing, J.C.J. Groot, J.D. Van der Ploeg, C. Laurent, D. Perraud, D.J. Stobbelaar, and M.K. Van Ittersum. 2009. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management 90: S112–S123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robinson, G.M. 2008. Sustainable rural systems: An introduction. In Sustainable rural systems: Sustainable agriculture and rural communities, ed. G.M. Robinson, 3–40. Basingstoke: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Seastedt, T.R., K.N. Suding, and F.S. Chapin. 2013. Ecosystem stewardship as a framework for conservation in a directionally changing world. In Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order, 326–333. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A.L., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar