The current state of knowledge of ecosystems and ecosystem services in Russia: A status report
- 398 Downloads
This paper focusses on a conceptual overview of ways to address a comprehensive analysis of ecosystem services (ES) in a country as large and heterogeneous as Russia. As a first step, a methodology for assessing the services for the federal subjects of Russia was chosen, i.e., its constituent provinces and similar entities, in physical terms. Russia harbors a great diversity of natural conditions and ecosystems which are suppliers of ES, and likewise a variety of the socio-economic conditions that shape the demand for these services and their consumption. The methodological approach described permits several important tasks to be addressed: the evaluation of the degree of satisfaction of people’s needs for ES, the identification of ecological donor and acceptor regions, and zoning of the country’s territory for ES assessment. The next step is to prepare a prototype of a National Report on ES in Russia, for which we are presenting the planned structure.
KeywordsBiodiversity Climate regulation Ecosystem functioning Environment National ecosystem assessment Russia
The following Russian colleagues helped prepare the initial draft of the Status Quo Report: Oleg F. Filenko, Vasiliy I. Grabovskiy, Aleksey A. Danilkin, Yury Y. Dgebuadze, Alexander V. Drozdov, Alexander V. Khoroshev, Gleb N. Kraev, Ilya N. Mordvintsev, Bella R. Striganova, Arkady A. Tishkov, and Armen R. Grigoryan. The German–Russian Project “Ecosystem Services Evaluation in Russia and other NIS Countries of Northern Eurasia: First Steps” is sponsored by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), with funds from the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB). We are particularly grateful to Heinrich Schmauder and Jürgen Nauber (BfN) for their commitment to the project, and three unknown reviewers for their advice, as well as to Phil Hill († 22. Dec. 2014), Berlin, for polishing the language.
- Antipov, A.N., V.V. Kravchenko, Y.M. Semenov, et al. 2006. Landscape planning: Tools and experiences in implementation. Bonn: V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS Publishers.Google Scholar
- Author Collective. 2012. Rio 20+ and new possibilities. Newsletter Sustainable Russia No. 61, Civil Chamber, Moscow, Russia (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
- BAFU. 2011. Indicators of ecosystem services. Report published by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment FOEN, Bern, Switzerland (in German, English summary). Retrieved 1 December, 2012, from http://www.environment-switzerland.ch/uw-1102-e.
- Bartalev, S.A., A.S. Belvard, D.V. Ershov, and A.S. Isaev. 2004. Map of terrestrial ecosystems of the Northern Eurasia. Russian Academy of Sciences: Space Research Institute (Digital Map in Russian).Google Scholar
- Bazilevich, N. 1993. Biological productivity of Northern Eurasia ecosystems. Moscow: Science Publisher (in Russian, English summary).Google Scholar
- Bobylev, S.N., E.N. Bukvareva, V.I. Grabovsky, A.A. Danilkin, Y.Y. Dgebuadze, A.V. Drozdov, D.G. Zamolodchikov, H.N. Kraev, et al. 2014. Analysis of the current knowledge about ecosystems and ecosystem services in Russia—A status-quo report. In TEEB-processes and ecosystem-assessment in Germany, Russia and other countries of Northern Eurasia, ed. K. Grunewald, O. Bastian, and A. Drozdov, 162–235. Bonn: BfN-Skripten 372 (in Russian and in German).Google Scholar
- Bobylev, S.N., and V.M. Zakharov. 2009. Ecosystem services and economy. Moscow: Institute of Sustainable Development/Center for Russian Environmental Policy (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Bukvareva, E.N. 2014. The global significance of Russian ecosystem functions and the problem of different scales of ecosystem services. In TEEB-processes and ecosystem-assessment in Germany, Russia and other countries of Northern Eurasia, ed. K. Grunewald, O. Bastian, and A. Drozdov, 92–125. Bonn: BfN-Skripten 372 (in Russian and in German).Google Scholar
- Bukvareva, E.N., and G.M. Alecshenko. 2013. The principle of the optimal diversity of biosystems. Moscow: KMK-Fellowship of Scientific Publications (in Russian).Google Scholar
- CBD—Convention on Biological Biodiversity. 2010. Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Montreal: CBD Secretariat.Google Scholar
- Chestnykh, O., D. Zamolodchikov, and D. Karelin. 1999. Resources of organic carbon in the soils of tundra and forest-tundra ecosystems in Russia. Russian Journal of Ecology 30: 392–398.Google Scholar
- Daily, G. (ed.). 1997. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Dolman, A.J., A. Shvidenko, D. Schepaschenko, P. Ciais, N. Tchebakova, T. Chen, M.K. van der Molen, L. Belelli Marchesini, et al. 2012. An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion method. Biogeosciences 9: 5323–5340. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-5323-2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dyakonov, K.N. 2007. Landscape studies in Moscow Lomonosov University: Development of scientific domains and education. In Landscape analysis for sustainable development. Theory and applications of landscape science in Russia, ed. K.N. Dyakonov, N.S. Kasimov, A.V. Khoroshev, and A.V. Kushlin, 11–20. Moscow: Alex Publishers.Google Scholar
- DZZ. 2011. Ukraine and Russia—Agriculture in transition, dzz No. 4—July 2011. Retrieved 1 June, 2012, from http://www.club-aktiv.de/info.php?info_ID=201.
- Forest Report. 1996. Forest utilization in the Russian Federation, 1946–1992. Report, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).Google Scholar
- de Groot, R.S. 1992. Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
- Grunewald, K., and O. Bastian (eds.). 2015. Ecosystem services—Concept, methods and case studies. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Grunewald, K., O. Bastian, and A. Drozdov (eds.). 2014a. TEEB-processes and ecosystem-assessment in Germany, Russia and other countries of Northern Eurasia. Bonn: BfN-Skripten 372 (in Russian and in German).Google Scholar
- Grunewald, K., O. Bastian, A. Drozdov, and V. Grabowsky (eds.). 2014b. Ascertainment and assessment of ecosystem services (ES)—Experiences, especially from Germany and Russia. Bonn: BfN-Skripten 373 (in Russian and in German).Google Scholar
- Haines-Young, R.H., and M.B. Potschin. 2010. Proposal for a common international classification of ecosystem goods and services (CICES) for integrated environmental and economic accounting (V1). Report to the European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
- Krever, V., M. Stishov, and I. Onufrenya. 2009. National protected areas of the Russian Federation: GAP-analysis and perspective framework. WWF-Russia, The Nature Conservancy. Moscow: MAVA.Google Scholar
- Maes, J., A. Teller, M. Erhard, et al. 2014. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. Indicators for ecosystem assessment under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- MEA-Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Minayeva, T., A. Sirin, and O. Bragg (eds.). 2009. A quick scan of peatlands in Central and Eastern Europe. Wageningen: Wetlands International.Google Scholar
- Morozov, A. 2000. Survey of illegal forest felling activities in Russia (forms and methods of illegal cuttings). Moscow, Greenpeace Russia. Retrieved 1 July, 2014, from http://old.forest.ru/eng/publications/illegal/.
- NEESPI. 2004. The Northern Eurasia earth science partnership initiative. Science Plan. 3.1. Terrestrial Ecosystem Dynamics. Retrieved 12 October, 2014, from http://www.neespi.org/.
- NU-IHDP, and UNEP. 2014. Inclusive Wealth Report 2014. Measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Parish, F., A. Sirin, D. Charman, H. Joosten, T. Minayeva, M. Silvius, and L. Stringer (eds.). 2008. Assessment on peatlands, biodiversity and climate change: Main report. Wageningen: Global Environment Centre, Kuala Lumpur and Wetlands International.Google Scholar
- Ptichnikov, A., and A. Kuritsyn. 2011. Systems of monitoring wood origins in Russia: Experience of timber companies and forest authorities. Analytical Report/WWF-Russia, Moscow (in Russian, English summary only on http://www.wwf.ru/resources/publ/book/eng/496).
- Salzman, J. 2005. Payments for ecosystem services. Notes from the field. New York University Law Review 80: 870.Google Scholar
- Sirin, A., T. Minayeva, A. Vozbrannaya, and S. Bartalev. 2011. How to escape from peat fires? Science in Russia 2: 13–21 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Smelyanskiy, I. 2012. The role of Russian steppe ecosystems in carbon deposition. Steppe Bulletin 35: 4–8 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Smelansky, I., and A. Tishkov. 2012. The Steppe biome in Russia: Ecosystem services, conservation status, and actual challenges. In Eurasian Steppes. Ecological problems and livelihoods in a changing world, 45–102. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Sohngen, B., K. Andrasko, M. Gytarsky, et al. 2005. Stocks and flows. Carbon inventory and mitigation potential of the Russian forest and land base. World Resources Institute. Retrieved from http://pubs.wri.org.
- TEEB—The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. 2013. Guidance manual for TEEB country studies. Version 1.0.Google Scholar
- Tishkov, A.A. 2005. Biosphere functions of natural ecosystems in Russia. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
- UNDP. 2010. Millennium development goals in Russia: Looking into the future. National Human Development Report for the Russian Federation, ed. S. Bobylev, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
- UNDP. 2011. Modernization and human development. National Human Development Report for the Russian Federation, ed. S. Bobylev, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
- Wooller, M., J. Pohlman, B. Gaglioti, P. Langdon, M. Jones, K. Walter Anthony, K. Becker, K.U. Hinrichs, et al. 2012. Reconstruction of past methane availability in an Arctic Alaska wetland indicates climate influenced methane release during the past ~12,000 years. Journal of Paleolimnology 48: 27–42. doi: 10.1007/s10933-012-9591-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yablokov, A.V. 2010. The environment and politics in Russia. Russian Analytical Digest 79/10. Retrieved 7 November, 2014, from http://www.laender-analysen.de/russland/rad/pdf/Russian_Analytical_Digest_79.pdf.
- Zakharov, V. (ed.). 2011. Towards a sustainable Russia, 2009–2011. Moscow: Institute of Sustainable Development, Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Zamolodchikov, D.G. 2012. The dynamics of the carbon balance of forests of Russia and its contribution to the change in atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide—Use and protection of natural resource of Russia. Scientific, Informative and Analytical Bulletin 5: 31–38 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Zavarzin, G.A., and V.N. Kudeyarov. 2006. Soils as the main source of carbon dioxide and a reservoir of organic carbon in Russia). Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 76: 14–29 (in Russian).Google Scholar