A functional-dynamic reflection on participatory processes in modeling projects
The participation of nonscientists in modeling projects/studies is increasingly employed to fulfill different functions. However, it is not well investigated if and how explicitly these functions and the dynamics of a participatory process are reflected by modeling projects in particular. In this review study, I explore participatory modeling projects from a functional-dynamic process perspective. The main differences among projects relate to the functions of participation—most often, more than one per project can be identified, along with the degree of explicit reflection (i.e., awareness and anticipation) on the dynamic process perspective. Moreover, two main approaches are revealed: participatory modeling covering diverse approaches and companion modeling. It becomes apparent that the degree of reflection on the participatory process itself is not always explicit and perfectly visible in the descriptions of the modeling projects. Thus, the use of common protocols or templates is discussed to facilitate project planning, as well as the publication of project results. A generic template may help, not in providing details of a project or model development, but in explicitly reflecting on the participatory process. It can serve to systematize the particular project’s approach to stakeholder collaboration, and thus quality management.
KeywordsModeling Stakeholders Review Functions of participation Transdisciplinarity Interdisciplinarity
The author thanks the four reviewers for their helpful suggestions to improve the paper, the colleagues Roland Barthel, Michael Stauffacher and Christian Pohl for discussions on earlier drafts of the manuscript, and Sandro Bösch for helping with the figures.
- Alcamo, J. 2002. Three issues for improving integrated models: Uncertainty, social science, and legitimacy. In Integrative modellierung zum globalen wandel, ed. C.F. Gethmann, and S. Lingner, 3–14. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners 35: 216–224.Google Scholar
- Bammer, G. 2014. From toolbox to big science project: A bold proposal. In Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research, ed. M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S.D. Eigenbrode, and J.D. Wulfhorst, 385–403. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Barreteau, O., P.W.G. Bots, and K.A. Daniell. 2010. A framework for clarifying “participation” in participatory research to prevent its rejection for the wrong reasons. Ecology and Society 15: 1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art1/.
- Barreteau, O., P. Bots, K. Daniell, M. Etienne, P. Perez, C. Barnaud, D. Bazile, N. Becu, et al. 2013. Participatory approaches. In Simulating social complexity, ed. B. Edmonds, and R. Meyer, 197–234. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bots, P.W., and C.E. van Daalen. 2008. Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management: a framework for reflection. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21: 389–407.Google Scholar
- Bradshaw, G.A., and M. Bekoff. 2001. Ecology and social responsibility: the re-embodiment of science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 460–465.Google Scholar
- de Mey, K., K. D’Haene, F. Marchand, M. Meul, and L. Lauwers. 2011. Learning through stakeholder involvement in the implementation of MOTIFS: an integrated assessment model for sustainable farming in Flanders. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9: 350–363. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2011.582355.Google Scholar
- Elbakidze, M., P.K. Angelstam, C. Sandström, and R. Axelsson. 2010. Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest initiatives: Adaptive governance toward sustainable forest management? Ecology and Society 15: 14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art14/.
- Elzinga, A. 2008. Participation. In Handbook of transdisciplinary research, eds. G. Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp, 345–359. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Evely, A.C., M. Pinard, M.S. Reed, and I. Fazey. 2011. High levels of participation in conservation projects enhance learning. Conservation Letters 4: 116–126.Google Scholar
- Francis, P., and R. James. 2003. Balancing rural poverty reduction and citizen participation: The contradictions of Uganda’s decentralization program. World Development 31: 325–337.Google Scholar
- Franzén, F., G. Kinell, J. Walve, R. Elmgren, and T. Söderqvist. 2011. Participatory social-ecological modeling in eutrophication management: The case of Himmerfjärden. Sweden. Ecology & Society 16: 27.Google Scholar
- Funtowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz. 2001. Global risk, uncertainty, and ignorance. In Global environmental risks, ed. J.X. Kasperson, and R.E. Kasperson, 173–194. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Gaube, V., C. Kaiser, M. Wildenberg, H. Adensam, P. Fleissner, J. Kobler, J. Lutz, A. Schaumberger, et al. 2009. Combining agent-based and stock-flow modelling approaches in a participative analysis of the integrated land system in Reichraming, Austria. Landscape Ecology 24: 1149–1165. doi: 10.1007/s10980-009-9356-6.Google Scholar
- Giupponi, C., A. Jakeman, D. Karssenberg, and M. Hare (eds.). 2006. Sustainable management of water resources: An integrated approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hirsch Hadorn, G., H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp (eds.). 2008. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Huber, R., S. Briner, H. Bugmann, C. Elkin, C. Hirschi, R. Seidl, and A. Rigling. 2014. Inter- and transdisciplinary perspective on the integration of ecological processes into ecosystem services analysis in a mountain region. Ecological Processes 3: 9.Google Scholar
- Jakeman, A.J., S. El Sawah, J.H.A. Guillaume, and S.A. Pierce. 2011. Making progress in integrated modelling and environmental decision support. Advances in Information and Communication Technology 359: 15–25.Google Scholar
- Johnson, J., and S. Hrynkow. 2011. Funding agencies and transdisciplinary research. In Converging disciplines, ed. M. Kirst, N. Schaefer-McDaniel, S. Hwang, and P. O’Campo, 149–160. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kipfer, A. (ed.). 2001. Roget’s international thesaurus, 6th ed. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
- Lagabrielle, E., A. Botta, W. Dare, D. David, S. Aubert, and C. Fabricius. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders to integrate biodiversity into land-use planning Lessons learned in Reunion Island (Western Indian Ocean). Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1413–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.011.Google Scholar
- Langsdale, S.M., A. Beall, J. Carmichael, S.J. Cohen, C.B. Forster, and T. Neale. 2009. Exploring the implications of climate change on water resources through participatory modeling: Case study of the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-Asce 135: 373–381. doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2009)135:5(373).Google Scholar
- Leclerc, G., A. Bah, B. Barbier, L. Boutinot, A. Botta, W. Dare, I.D. Gaye, C. Fourage, et al. 2009. Managing tricky decentralised competencies: case study of a participatory modelling experiment on land use in the Lake Guiers area in Northern Senegal. Sustainability Science 4: 243–261. doi: 10.1007/s11625-009-0083-3.Google Scholar
- Lee, N. 2006. Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26: 57–78.Google Scholar
- Liu, J., T. Dietz, S.R. Carpenter, C. Folke, M. Alberti, C.L. Redman, S.H. Schneider, E. Ostrom, et al. 2007. Coupled human and natural systems. AMBIO 36: 639–649.Google Scholar
- Liu, Y., H. Gupta, E. Springer, and T. Wagener. 2008. Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environmental Modelling and Software 23: 846–858. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.007.Google Scholar
- Ludwig, D. 2001. The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4: 758–764.Google Scholar
- MacMynowski, D.P. 2007. Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: Power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society 12: 20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/.
- Martínez-Santos, P., H.J. Henriksen, P. Zorrilla, and P.E. Martínez-Alfaro. 2010. Comparative reflections on the use of modelling tools in conflictive water management settings: The Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1439–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.011.Google Scholar
- Matthews, K., M. Rivington, K. Blackstock, G. McCrum, K. Buchan, and D. Miller. 2011. Raising the bar?–The challenges of evaluating the outcomes of environmental modelling and software. Environmental Modelling and Software 26: 247–257.Google Scholar
- Mashkina, O., E. Furman, H. Mela, and P. Kivimaa. 2009. Transnational research programmes on environment: Analysis of ERA-Nets’ experiences and recommendations for good practices. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute.Google Scholar
- Mostert, E. 2006. Participation for sustainable water management. In Sustainable management of water resources: An integrated approach, ed. C. Giupponi, A.J. Jakeman, D. Karssenberg, and M. Hare, 153–176. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Naivinit, W., C. Le Page, G. Trebuil, and N. Gajaseni. 2010. Participatory agent-based modeling and simulation of rice production and labor migrations in Northeast Thailand. Environmental Modelling & Software 25: 1345–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.012.
- Pahl-Wostl, C., M. Craps, A. Dewulf, E. Mostert, D. Tabara, and T. Taillieu. 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12: 5.Google Scholar
- Pennington, D.D. 2008. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning. Ecology and Society 13: 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art8/.
- Pohl, C., and G.H. Hadorn. 2007. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research—proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Science. Munich: Oekom.Google Scholar
- Pohl, C., S. Rist, A. Zimmermann, P. Fry, G.S. Gurung, F. Schneider, C.I. Speranza, B. Kiteme, et al. 2010. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Science and Public Policy 37: 267–281.Google Scholar
- Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431.Google Scholar
- Reed, M.S., A.C. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, J. Newig, B. Parrish, et al. 2010. What is social learning? Ecology and Society 15: r1.Google Scholar
- Rittel, H.W., and M.M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.Google Scholar
- Rosener, J.B. 1975. A cafeteria of techniques and critiques. Public Management 57: 16–19.Google Scholar
- Rowe, G., and L.J. Frewer. 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values 30: 251–290. doi: 10.1177/0162243904271724.
- Ruankaew, N., C. Le Page, P. Dumrongrojwattana, C. Barnaud, N. Gajaseni, A. van Paassen, and G. Trebuil. 2010. Companion modelling for integrated renewable resource management: a new collaborative approach to create common values for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 17: 15–23. doi: 10.1080/13504500903481474.Google Scholar
- Salerno, F., E. Cuccillato, P. Caroli, B. Bajracharya, E.C. Manfredi, G. Viviano, S. Thakuri, B. Flury, et al. 2010. Experience with a hard and soft participatory modeling framework for social-ecological system management in Mount Everest (Nepal) and K2 (Pakistan) Protected Areas. Mountain Research and Development 30: 80–93. doi: 10.1659/mrd-journal-d-10-00014.1.Google Scholar
- Sandker, M., B.M. Campbell, M. Ruiz-Pérez, J.A. Sayer, R. Cowling, H. Kassa, and A.T. Knight. 2010. The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development. Ecology and Society 15: 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art13/.
- Schmitt Olabisi, L., S. Blythe, A. Ligmann-Zielinska, and S. Marquart-Pyatt. 2014. Modeling as a tool for cross-disciplinary communication in solving environmental problems. In Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research, ed. S.C. O’Rourke, S.D. Eigenbrode, and J.D. Wulfhorst, 271–290. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Scholz, R.W. 2011. Environmental literacy in science and society: From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Scholz, R.W., D.J. Lang, A. Wiek, A.I. Walter, and M. Stauffacher. 2006. Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7: 226–251.Google Scholar
- Schröter, D., L. Acosta-Michlik, A. Arnell, M. Araújo, F. Badeck, M. Bakker, A. Bondeau, H. Bugmann, et al. 2004. The ATEAM final report 2004—Detailed report related to overall project duration. Advanced terrestrial ecosystem analysis and modelling, a project funded under the 5th framework Programme of the European Union. Potsdam, Germany: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.Google Scholar
- Schröter, D., W. Cramer, R. Leemans, I.C. Prentice, M.B. Araújo, N.W. Arnell, A. Bondeau, H. Bugmann, et al. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310: 1333–1337.Google Scholar
- Smajgl, A. 2010. Challenging beliefs through multi-level participatory modelling in Indonesia. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1470–1476.Google Scholar
- Snow, C.P. 1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Stauffacher, M. 2011. Umweltsoziologie und Transdisziplinarität. In Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, ed. M. Groß, 259–276. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
- Stauffacher, M., T. Flüeler, P. Krütli, and R.W. Scholz. 2008. Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: A transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21: 409–422. doi: 10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7.Google Scholar
- Stauffacher, M., A. Walter, D.J. Lang, A. Wiek, and R.W. Scholz. 2006. Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: the transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7: 252–275.Google Scholar
- Sterk, B., M.K. van Ittersum, and C. Leeuwis. 2011. How, when, and for what reasons does land use modelling contribute to societal problem solving? Environmental Modelling and Software 26: 310–316.Google Scholar
- Stokols, D. 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology 38: 63–77.Google Scholar
- Stringer, L.C., A.J. Dougill, E. Fraser, K. Hubacek, C. Prell, and M.S. Reed. 2006. Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11: 39.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J.L., C.B. Forster, C. Werner, and T.R. Peterson. 2010. Mediated modeling: Using collaborative processes to integrate scientist and stakeholder knowledge about greenhouse gas emissions in an urban ecosystem. Society & Natural Resources 23: 742–757. doi: 10.1080/08941920802102032.Google Scholar
- Thompson Klein, J. 2010. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, ed. R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, and C. Mitcham, 15–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Vayssières, J., F. Bocquier, and P. Lecomte. 2009. GAMEDE: A global activity model for evaluating the sustainability of dairy enterprises. Part II—Interactive simulation of various management strategies with diverse stakeholders. Agricultural Systems 101: 139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.006.Google Scholar
- Voinov, A., and F. Bousquet. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1268–1281.Google Scholar
- Voinov, A., and E.J.B. Gaddis. 2008. Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecological Modelling 216: 197–207.Google Scholar
- Volk, M., S. Lautenbach, H. Van Delden, L.T.H. Newham, and R. Seppelt. 2010. How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems. Environmental Management 46: 834–849.Google Scholar
- Wäger, P., O. Ejderyan, F. Schmid, M. Stauffacher, and C. Zingerli. 2014. The role of social sciences and humanities in integrative research on natural resources. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 23: 142–144.Google Scholar