Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 44, Issue 7, pp 666–677 | Cite as

Historical and contemporary cultural ecosystem service values in the rapidly urbanizing city state of Singapore

  • Jharyathri Thiagarajah
  • Shermaine K. M. Wong
  • Daniel R. Richards
  • Daniel A. Friess
Report

Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services are a function of people and place, so may change as a location transitions from rural to urban. Singapore has undergone rapid urbanization after its independence in 1965, with a concomitant decline in natural habitat extent and accessibility. Using coastal mangrove forests as a case study habitat, changing cultural values were explored with a novel array of techniques, including qualitative archival analysis (photographs, oral histories), current sources (publically uploaded social media photographs), and surveys of (a) the general public and (b) visitors to publically accessible mangroves. Cultural value changed through time, with a significant transition from intrinsic, intrapersonal values (spiritual, cultural heritage) to instrumental, interpersonal values (recreation, education). Additionally, cultural value varied between different mangroves depending on their public accessibility, and the evolving degree of human interaction with the ecosystem as urban development occured. Cultural values change as development transitions, though mangroves still play an important cultural role in a heavily urbanized environment.

Keywords

Coastal Ecosystem services Mangrove Recreation Singapore Urbanization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Govt. of Singapore (R-109-000-147-112). The permission of National Parks Board park staff to conduct visitor surveys on their sites is greatly appreciated. Photographs used in this study were provided by Ria Tan (WildSingapore), Sivasothi N. (National University of Singapore), Barbara J. Anello, the Institute for Southeast Asian Studies, and the National Archives of Singapore. This research conforms to the ethics requirements of the Department of Geography, National University of Singapore.

References

  1. Andersson, E., S. Barthel, S. Borgström, J. Colding, T. Elmqvist, C. Folke, and Å. Gren. 2014. Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. AMBIO 43: 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengston, D.N. 1994. Changing forest values and management. Society and Natural Resources 7: 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolund, P., and S. Hunhammar. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29: 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breuste, J., D. Haase, and T. Elmqvist. 2013. Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In Ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes, ed. S. Wratten, H. Sandhu, R. Cullen, and R. Costanza, 83–100. Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan, B.A., C.M. Raymond, N.D. Crossman, and D.H. Macdonald. 2010. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? Landscape and Urban Planning 97: 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casalegno, S., R. Inger, C. Desilvey, and K.J. Gaston. 2013. Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. PLoS One 8: e68437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chia, L.S., and L.M. Chou. 1991. Urban coastal area management: The experience of Singapore. Manila: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management. 128p.Google Scholar
  8. Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiesura, A., and R. de Groot. 2003. Critical natural capital: A socio-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 44: 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corlett, R.T. 1992. The ecological transformation of Singapore, 1819–1990. Journal of Biogeography 19: 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Koninck, R., S. Bernard, and J.-F. Bissonnette. 2008. Singapore: An atlas of perpetual territorial transformation. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
  12. Daniel, T.C., A. Muhar, A. Arnberger, O. Aznar, J.W. Boyd, K.M. Chan, R. Costanza, T. Elmqvist, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 8812–8819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friess, D.A., J. Phelps, R.C. Leong, W.K. Lee, A.K.S. Wee, N. Sivasothi, R.R.Y. Oh, and E.L. Webb. 2012. Mandai Mangrove, Singapore: Lessons for the conservation of Southeast Asia’s Mangroves. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 25: 55–65.Google Scholar
  14. Gee, K., and B. Burkhard. 2010. Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig–Holstein. Ecological Complexity 7: 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gómez-Baggethun, E., and D.N. Barton. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics 86: 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen-Ketchum, P.A., P. Marck, L. Reutter, and E. Halpenny. 2011. Strengthening access to restorative places: Findings from a participatory study on engaging with nature in the promotion of health. Health & Place 17: 558–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henderson, J.C. 2013. Urban parks and green spaces in Singapore. Managing Leisure 18: 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hernández-Morcillo, M., T. Plieninger, and C. Bieling. 2013. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological Indicators 29: 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hilton, M.J., and S.S. Manning. 1995. Conservation of coastal habitats in Singapore: Indications of unsustainable development. Environmental Conservation 22: 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irvine, K.N., P. Devine-Wright, S.R. Payne, R.A. Fuller, B. Painter, and K.J. Gaston. 2009. Green space, soundscape and urban sustainability: an interdisciplinary, empirical study. Local Environment 14: 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ives, C.D., and D. Kendal. 2014. The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management 144: 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, G.K., J.O. Adegoke, S. Osagie, S. Ekechukwu, P. Nwilo, and J. Akinyede. 2013. Social valuation of mangroves in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 9: 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kong, L., and B.S.A. Yeoh. 1996. Social constructions of nature in urban Singapore. Southeast Asian Studies 34: 402–423.Google Scholar
  24. Lai, S., L.H. Loke, M.J. Hilton, T.J. Bouma, and P.A. Todd. 2015. The effects of urbanisation on coastal habitats and the potential for ecological engineering: a Singapore case study. Ocean and Coastal Management 103: 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewicka, M. 2008. Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28: 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loh, K.S. 2009. Conflict and change at the margins: Emergency kampong clearance and the making of modern Singapore. Asian Studies Review 33: 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mason, M. 2010. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11: 8.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, C., and G.B. Rossman. 2006. Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human wellbeing. New York: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Google Scholar
  30. Murphy J, Link MW, Childs JW, Tesfaye CL, Dean E, Stern M, Pasek J, Cohen J, et al. 2014. Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Google Scholar
  31. National Parks Board, 2015. The southern ridges. National Parks Board, Ministry of National Development, Government of Singapore. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from https://www.nparks.gov.sg/gardens-parks-and-nature/parks-and-nature-reserves/the-southern-ridges.
  32. Ng, L. 2008. A city in a garden. Ethos: World Cities Summit Issue 1: 62–68.Google Scholar
  33. NPTD. 2013. A sustainable population for a dynamic Singapore. National Population and Talent Division.Google Scholar
  34. Pesch, C.E., and J. Garber. 2001. Historical analysis, a valuable tool in community—Based environmental protection. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42: 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pleasant, M.M., S.A. Gray, C. Lepczyk, A. Fernandes, N. Hunter, and D. Ford. 2014. Managing cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 8: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plieninger, T., S. Dijks, E. Oteros-Rozas, and C. Bieling. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33: 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Polidoro, B.A., K.E. Carpenter, L. Collins, N.C. Duke, A.M. Ellison, J.C. Ellison, E.J. Farnsworth, E.S. Fernando, et al. 2010. The loss of species: Mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS One 5: e10095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ray, R., D. Ganguly, C. Chowdhury, M. Dey, S. Das, M.K. Dutta, S.K. Mandal, N. Majumder, T.K. De, S.K. Mukhopadhyay, and T.K. Jana. 2011. Carbon sequestration and annual increase of carbon stock in a mangrove forest. Atmospheric Environment 45: 5016–5024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raymond, C.M., B.A. Bryan, D.H. MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, A. Grandgirard, and T. Kalivas. 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 68: 1301–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richards, D.R., and D.A. Friess. 2015. A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: Content analysis of social media photographs. Ecological Indicators 53: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. R Core. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved, from http://www.R-project.org/.
  42. Sandler, R. 2012. Intrinsic Value, Ecology, and Conservation. Nature Education 3: 4.Google Scholar
  43. Satz, D., R.K. Gould, K.M.A. Chan, A. Guerry, B. Norton, T. Satterfield, B.S. Halpern, J. Levine, U. Woodside, N. Hannahs, X. Basurto, and S. Klain. 2013. The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment. AMBIO 42: 675–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Selim SA, Blanchard JL, Bedford J, Webb TJ. 2014. Direct and indirect effects of climate and fishing on changes in coastal ecosystem services: a historical perspective from the North Sea. Regional Environmental Change.Google Scholar
  45. Singapore Department of Statistics. 2013. Singapore in brief. Singapore: Singapore Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  46. Sodhi, N.S., L.P. Koh, B.W. Brook, and P.K.L. Ng. 2004. Southeast Asian biodiversity: An impending disaster. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 654–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Su, S., R. Xiao, Z. Jiang, and Y. Zhang. 2012. Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Applied Geography 34: 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tan, P.Y., J. Wang, and A. Sia. 2013. Perspectives on five decades of the urban greening of Singapore. Cities 32: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Teo, S.E., and V.R. Savage. 1985. Singapore landscape: A historical overview of housing change. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 6: 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tianhong, L., L. Wenkai, and Q. Zhanghan. 2010. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen. Ecological Economics 69: 1427–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thompson, C.W. 2002. Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. URA. 2010. URA lifestyle Survey 2009. Urban Redevelopment Authority, Govt. of Singapore, 80 pp. Retrievedhttp://www.ura.gov.sg/uol/publications/research-resources/plans-reports/Concept%20Plan%202011/ura_lifestyle_survey_2009.aspx.
  53. URA. 2013. A high quality living environment for all Singaporeans. Urban Redevelopment Authority. Retrieved September 30, 2014, from http://www.ura.gov.sg/uol/publications/research-resources/plans-reports/Concept%20Plan%202011/land_use_plan_2013.aspx.
  54. Wang, D., G. Brown, and I. Mateo-Babiano. 2013. Beyond proximity: An integrated model of accessibility for public parks. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 2: 486–498.Google Scholar
  55. Willits, F.K., and A.E. Luloff. 1995. Urban residents’ views of rurality and contacts with rural places. Rural Sociology 60: 454–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wood, S.A., A.D. Guerry, J.M. Silver, and M. Lacayo. 2013. Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation. Scientific Reports 3: 2976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yee, A.T.K., W.F. Ang, S. Teo, S.C. Liew, and H.T.W. Tan. 2010. The present extent of mangrove forests in Singapore. Nature in Singapore 3: 139–145.Google Scholar
  58. Yee, A.T.K., R.C. Corlett, S.C. Liew, and H.T.W. Tan. 2011. The vegetation of Singapore—An updated map. Gardens Bulletin 63: 205–212.Google Scholar
  59. Yuen, B. 1996. Creating the Garden City: The Singapore experience. Urban Studies 33: 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhao, B., U. Kreuter, B. Li, Z. Ma, J. Chen, and N. Nakagoshi. 2004. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy 21: 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ziegler, A.D., J.P. Terry, G.J.H. Oliver, D.A. Friess, C.J. Chuah, W.T.L. Chow, and R.J. Wasson. 2014. Increasing Singapore’s resilience to drought. Hydrological Processes 28: 4543–4548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jharyathri Thiagarajah
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shermaine K. M. Wong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel R. Richards
    • 1
  • Daniel A. Friess
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Environmental Studies ProgrammeNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations