Ecological carryover effects complicate conservation
Ecological carryover effects occur when an individual’s previous history and experiences explain their current performance. It is becoming clear that ecological carryover effects are a common phenomenon across taxa, and have the potential to play an important role in governing individual fitness and population dynamics. Carryover effects may reduce the success of conservation efforts aimed at slowing or reversing biodiversity loss. Failure to consider carryover effects might lead to erroneous conclusions about the effectiveness of conservation measures. We suggest that carryover effects are considered explicitly in threat assessment and conservation planning, in order to understand the long-term consequences of stressors, target efforts more effectively, and ensure that the success or failure of conservation efforts is tracked more accurately. We encourage proactive research focused on the proximate mechanisms underlying carryover effects, so that predictive measures of carryover effects in wild populations can be developed and refined. Finally, we suggest that in some cases, positive carryover effects could be exploited for conservation benefit. We conclude that the failure to consider carryover effects in conservation science and practice may put imperiled populations at further risk.
KeywordsStress Fisheries Wildlife Management Latent effect Delayed effect
CMO is supported by the NSERC Postdoctoral Fellowship. SJC is supported by the Canada Research Chairs program, the NSERC Discovery Grant program, and Carleton University.
- Berger-Tal, O., T. Polak, A. Oron, Y. Lubin, B.P. Kotler, and D. Saltz. 2011. Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: A conceptual framework. Behavioral Ecology 22: 236–239. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq224.
- Bolger, D.T., W.D. Newmark, T.A. Morrison, and D.F. Doak. 2008. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecology Letters 11: 63–77.Google Scholar
- Bowlin, M.S., I.A. Bisson, J. Shamoun-Baranes, J.D. Reichard, N. Sapir, P.P. Marra, T.H. Kunz, D.S. Wilcove, A. Hedenström, C.G. Guglielmo, S.A. Åkesson, M. Ramenofsky, and M. Wikelski. 2010. Grand challenges in migration biology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 50: 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Calvert, A.M., S.J. Walde, and P.D. Taylor. 2009. Nonbreeding-season drivers of population dynamics in seasonal migrants: Conservation parallels across taxa. Avian Conservation and Ecology 4: 5.Google Scholar
- Cooke, S.J., S.G. Hinch, M.R. Donaldson, T.D. Clark, E.J. Eliason, G.T. Crossin, G.D. Raby, K.M. Jeffries, M. Lapointe, K. Miller, D.A. Patterson, and A.P. Farrell. 2012. Conservation physiology in practice: How physiological knowledge has improved our ability to sustainably manage Pacific salmon during up-river migration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367: 1757–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feil, R., and M.F. Fraga. 2012. Epigenetic and the environment: Emerging patterns and implications. Nature Reviews Genetics 13: 97–109.Google Scholar
- Green, R.J., and K. Higginbottom. 2000. The effects of non-consumptive wildlife tourism on free-ranging wildlife: A review. Pacific Conservation Biology 6: 183.Google Scholar
- Leslie, P.H. 1959. The properties of a certain lag type of population growth and the influence of an external random factor on a number of such populations. Physiological Zoology 32: 151–159.Google Scholar
- Miller, K.M., S. Li, K.H. Kaukinen, N. Ginther, E. Hamill, J.M.R. Curtis, D.A. Patterson, T. Sierocinski, L. Donnison, P. Pavlidis, S.G. Hinch, K.A. Hruska, S.J. Cooke, K.K. English, and A.P. Farrell. 2011. Genomic signatures predict migration and spawning failure in wild Canadian salmon. Science 331: 214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, K.M., A. Teffer, S. Tucker, S. Li, A.D. Schulze, M. Trudel, F. Juanes, A. Tabata, K.H. Kaukinen, N.G. Ginther, et al. 2014. Infectious disease, shifting climates and opportunistic predators: Cumulative factors potentially impacting wild salmon declines. Evolutionary Applications 7: 812–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Møller, A.P. 2011. Behavioral and life history responses to extreme climatic conditions: Studies on a migratory songbird. Current Zoology 57: 351–362.Google Scholar
- Moreno, J., and A.P. Møller. 2011. Extreme climatic events in relation to global change and their impact on life histories. Current Zoology 57: 375–389.Google Scholar
- Page, S.J., R.K. Dowling, and S.J. Page. 2001. Ecotourism. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- Primack, R.B. 2010. Essentials of Conservation Biology, 5th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
- Ratikainen, I.I., J.A. Gill, T.G. Gunnarsson, W.J. Sutherland, and H. Kokko. 2008. When density dependence is not instantaneous: Theoretical developments and management implications. Ecology Letters 11: 184–198.Google Scholar
- Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, R.B. Alley, T. Berntsen, N.L. Bindoff, Z. Chen, A. Chidthaisong, J.M. Gregory, G.C. Hegerl, et al. 2007. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wingfield, J.C., J.P. Kelley, and F. Angelier. 2011. What are extreme environmental conditions and how do organisms cope with them? Current Zoology 57: 363–374.Google Scholar