Skip to main content

Efficient and resilient governance of social–ecological systems

Abstract

New institutions are critically needed to improve the resilience of social–ecological systems globally. Watershed management offers an important model due to its ability to govern mixed-ownership landscapes through common property regimes, translating national goals into local action. Here, I assess the efficacy of state watershed management institutions in the Pacific Northwest, based on their ability to support local watershed groups. I use document analysis to describe and compare state institutions in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California. Results indicate that state institutional efficiency and resilience are the key factors determining watershed group activity and stability. The primary drivers of institutional efficiency and resilience were institutional unification, robust funding portfolios, low agency conflict, and strong support for economic multiplier effects, creative partnerships, and scholarly research. My findings elucidate the critical role of institutional efficiency and resilience in governing dynamic and complex social–ecological systems, enabling the flexibility to address emergent transformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Amos, C.B., P. Audet, W.C. Hammond, R. Burgmann, I.A. Johanson, and G. Blewitt. 2014. Uplift and seismicity driven by groundwater depletion in central California. Nature 509: 483–486. doi:10.1038/nature13275.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. 1981. The emergence of cooperation among egoists. American Political Science Review 75: 306–318. doi:10.2307/1961366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., D.R. Armitage, and N. Doubleday. 2007. Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., C. Folke, and J. Colding. 2000. Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, W., T. Heikkila, and E. Schlager. 2004. Building the agenda for institutional research in water resource management. American Water Resources Association 40: 925–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, S.M., and K.D. Genskow, 1999. Exploring the watershed approach: Critical dimensions of state-local partnerships. The Four Corners Watershed Innovators Initiative Report, Madison, WI (in Swedish, English summary).

  • Borsa, A.A., D.C. Agnew, and D.R. Cayan. 2014. Ongoing drought-induced uplift in the western United States. Science. doi:10.1126/science.1260279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, S.L., B.F. Thomas, J.T. Reager, M. Rodell, S.C. Swenson, and J.S. Famiglietti. 2014. Groundwater depletion during drought threatens future water security of the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters 41: 5904–5911. doi:10.1002/2014gl061055.

  • Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Program. 2012. Program funds by fiscal year and account. Retrieved August 17, 2012, from http://www.cbfish.org/Fund.mvc/Index.

  • Erickson, A.M. 2014. Nested localized institutions for adaptive co-management: A history of state watershed management in the Pacific Region of the United States. Society & Natural Resources 28: 1–16. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.933920.

  • Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., S. Carpenter, T. Elmqvist, L. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and B. Walker. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO 31: 437–440. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Å. Jansson, J. Rockström, P. Olsson, S. Carpenter, F.S. Chapin III, A.-S. Crépin, G. Daily, et al. 2011. Reconnecting to the biosphere. AMBIO 40: 719–738. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getches, D.H. 2001. Some irreverent questions about watershed-based efforts. In Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West, ed. P. Brick, D. Snow, and S. Van De Wetering. Washington, D.C: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, M., and S. Lurie. 2005. Understanding the community economic and social impacts of Oregon’s Watershed Councils. University of Oregon Report, Eugene, OR (in Swedish, English summary).

  • Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Laxenburg/Chichester: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis/Wiley.

  • Katz, J., P. Moyle, R. Quiñones, J. Israel, and S. Purdy. 2013. Impending extinction of salmon, steelhead, and trout (Salmonidae) in California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 96: 1169–1186. doi:10.1007/s10641-012-9974-8.

  • Kenney, D.S. 1999. Historical and sociopolitical context of the western watersheds movement. JAWRA: Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35: 493–503. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03606.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. 2007. Watershed management: Lessons from common property theory. International Journal of the Commons 1: 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.A., N.P. Lester, A.D. Bradshaw, J.E. Fitzgibbon, K. Fuller, L. Hakanson, and C. Richards. 1996. Considerations of scale in habitat conservation and restoration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 440–445. doi:10.1139/f96-021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.F. 1950. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36: 48–49. doi:10.1073/pnas.36.1.48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Marine Fisheries Service. 2011. Report to Congress: Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund: FY 2000–2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Silver Spring, MD.

  • National Research Council: Committee on Assessment of Water Resources Research. 2004. Confronting the nation’s water problems: The role of research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen-Pincus, M., and C. Moseley. 2010. Economic and employment impacts of forest and watershed restoration in Oregon. University of Oregon Report (in Swedish, English summary).

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, E. 1989. Co-operative management of local fisheries: New directions for improved management and community development. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, T., J. Lichatowich, W. Towey, and A. Duncan. 2006. Building science and accountability into community-based restoration: Can a new funding approach facilitate effective and accountable restoration? Fisheries 31: 17–24. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(2006)31[17:BSAAIC]2.0.CO;2.

  • Roni, P., T.J. Beechie, R.E. Bilby, F.E. Leonetti, M.M. Pollock, and G.R. Pess. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roni, P., G. Pess, T. Beechie, and S. Morley. 2010. Estimating changes in Coho Salmon and Steelhead abundance from watershed restoration: How much restoration is needed to measurably increase smolt production? North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30: 1469–1484. doi:10.1577/m09-162.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of California. 2008. California Department of Conservation, 2004–2007. Watershed Coordinator Grant Program: Final Report. D. o. Conservation, Sacramento, CA.

  • State of Idaho. 1996. Bull Trout Conservation Plan. Governor Philip E. Batt, 133. Boise, ID.

  • State of Washington. 2008. Directory: Lead entities for Salmon recovery. D. o. F. a. Wildlife, Olympia, WA.

  • State of Washington. 2011. Memorandum of Understanding: ESHB 2514 and ESHB 2496. Retrieved February 8, 2011, from http://www.ecy.wa.gov/watershed/misc/MOU.html.

  • State of Washington. 2012. State of salmon in watersheds. Olympia, WA: G. s. S. R. Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. 2002. Columbia River Basin Salmon and Steelhead: Federal Agencies’ recovery responsibilities, expenditures and actions: Report to the Ranking minority member, subcommittee on fisheries, wildlife, and water, committee on environment and public works, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office.

  • Vaux, H. 2005. Water resources research in the 21st century. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 131: 2–12. doi:10.1111/j.1936-704X.2005.mp131001002.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., P. Olsson, C. Folke, T. Homer-Dixon, H. Vredenburg, D. Loorbach, J. Thompson, M. Nilsson, et al. 2011. Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. AMBIO 40: 762–780. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.C., J.R. Nielsen, and P. Degnbol. 2003. The fisheries co-management experience: Accomplishments, challenges, and prospects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Michael Hibbard and Max Nielsen-Pincus for their guidance and enthusiasm for watershed management. I would also like to thank Daniel Gavin and Joshua Roering for their insights on long-term physical processes important to watershed functioning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Erickson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erickson, A. Efficient and resilient governance of social–ecological systems. Ambio 44, 343–352 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0607-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0607-7

Keywords

  • Adaptive co-management
  • Biodiversity
  • Governance
  • Resilience
  • Social–ecological systems
  • Watershed management