Skip to main content

Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds: Insights for environmental policies

Abstract

Local ecological knowledge (LEK) has been found to be one of the main bridges to manage biocultural diversity. We analyzed the factors affecting LEK maintenance and transmission in a Mediterranean watershed. We used a mixed methods approach to evaluate the agricultural LEK in three different dimensions: biological, soil and water management, and forecasting. We found that the main factors for its maintenance were the respondent's time living in the area and the social relationships established among farmers, which involved partner collaboration and farmer information exchanges. Protected areas also played a key role for maintaining the LEK associated with soil and water management. Finally, we found that outmigration and mechanization were the most important indirect drivers of change underlying LEK erosion. We suggest that environmental policies should focus on promoting this experiential knowledge, considering both intergenerational renewal and the gendered aspects of this knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Altieri, M.A., and V.M. Toledo. 2005. Natural resource management among small-scale farmers in semi-arid lands: Building on traditional knowledge and agroecology. Annals of Arid Zone 44: 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barthel, S., F. Carl, and C. Johan. 2010. Social–ecological memory in urban gardens—Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 20: 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkes, F. 2008. Sacred Ecology, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanckaert, I., K. Vancraeynest, R.L. Swennen, F.J. Espinosa-García, D. Piñero, and R. Lira-Saade. 2007. Non-crop resources and the role of indigenous knowledge in semi-arid production of Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blondel, J., J. Aronson, J.-Y. Bodiou, and G. Boeuf. 2010. The Mediterranean Region Biological Diversity in Space and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandth, B. 2002. Gender identity in European family farming: A literature review. Sociologia Ruralis 42: 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brook, R.K., and S.M. McLachlan. 2008. Trends and prospects for local knowledge in ecological and conservation research and monitoring. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 3501–3512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bugalho, M.N., M.C. Caldeira, J.S. Pereira, J. Aronson, and J.G. Pausas. 2011. Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9: 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Camarero, L., and R. Sampedro. 2008. Why are women leaving? The mobility continuum as an explanation of rural masculinization process. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 124: 73–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carvalho, A.M., and A. Frazão-Moreira. 2011. Importance of local knowledge in plant resources management and conservation in two protected areas from Trás-os-Montes, Portugal. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 7: 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson-Hunt, I., and F. Berkes. 2003. Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of social-ecological environments and adaptive learning. Conservation Ecology 8: article 5.

  14. Davis, A., and K. Ruddle. 2010. Constructing confidence: Rational skepticism and systematic enquiry in local ecological knowledge research. Ecological Applications 20: 880–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, A., and J.R. Wagner. 2003. Who knows? On the importance of identifying “experts” when researching local ecological knowledge. Human Ecology 31: 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deda, P., and R. Rubian. 2004. Women and biodiversity: The long journey from users to policy-makers. Natural Resources Forum 28: 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Doré, T., D. Makowski, E. Malézieux, N. Munier-Jolain, M. Tchamitchian, and P. Tittonell. 2011. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy 34: 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. EME—Evaluación de los Ecosistemas del Milenio de España. 2011. Ecosistemas y biodiversidad para el bienestar humano. Síntesis de los Resultados. Madrid: Fundación Biodiversidad.

  19. Espín, R., E. Ortiz, and J.R. Guzmán. 2010. Manual del acequiero. Parques Nacional y Natural de Sierra Nevada. Agencia Andaluza del Agua. Consejería de Medio Ambiente. Junta de Andalucía.

  20. EEA—European Environmental Agency. 2010. Europe’s Ecological Backbone: Recognising the True Value of Our Mountains. Copenhagen.

  21. Fernández-Giménez, M.E., and F. Fillat Estaque. 2012. Pyrenean Pastoralists’ ecological knowledge: Documentation and application to natural resource management and adaptation. Human Ecology 40: 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer, J., T. Hartel, and T. Kuemmerle. 2012. Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters 5: 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Folke, C., A. Jansson, J. Rockstrom, P. Olsson, S.R. Carpenter, G. Daily, K. Danell, J. Ebbesson, et al. 2011. Reconnecting to the biosphere. AMBIO 40: 719–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. García-Llorente, M., B. Martín-López, I. Iniesta-Arandia, C.A. López-Santiago, P.A. Aguilera, and C. Montes. 2012. The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach. Environmental Science & Policy 19–20: 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gómez-Baggethun, E., and V. Reyes-García. 2013. Reinterpreting change in traditional ecological knowledge. Human Ecology 41: 643–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gómez-Baggethun, E., S. Mingorría, V. Reyes-García, L. Calvet, and C. Montes. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: Empirical study in the Doñana natural areas. Conservation Biology 24: 721–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gómez-Baggethun, E., V. Reyes-García, P. Olsson, and C. Montes. 2012. Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: A case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environmental Change 22: 640–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gorenflo, L.J., S. Romaine, R.A. Mittermeier, and K. Walker-Painemilla. 2012. Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 8032–80376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hernández-Morcillo, M., J. Hoberg, E. Oteros-Rozas, T. Plieninger, E. Gómez-Baggethun, and V. Reyes-García. 2014. Traditional ecological knowledge in Europe: Status quo and insights for the Environmental Policy Agenda. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 56: 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huntington, H.P. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10: 1270–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Iniesta-Arandia, I., C. Piñeiro, C. Montes, and B. Martín-López. 2014. Women and the conservation of agroecosystems: An experiential analysis in the Río Nacimiento region of Almería (Spain)/Mujeres y conservación de agroecosistemas. Análisis de experiencias en la comarca almeriense del río Nacimiento. Psyecology: Revista Bilingüe de Psicología Ambiental/Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology: 1–17. doi:10.1080/21711976.2014.942516.

  32. MARM—Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino. 2011. Diagnóstico de la Igualdad de Género en el Medio Rural. Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino.

  33. Martín-López, B., M. García-Llorente, I. Palomo, and C. Montes. 2011. The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social–ecological system (southwestern Spain). Ecological Economics 70: 1481–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martín-López, B., I. Iniesta-Arandia, M. García-Llorente, I. Palomo, I. Casado-Arzuaga, D. García del Amo, E. Gómez-Baggethun, E. Oteros-Rozas, et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem services bundles through social preferences: Experimental evidence from Spain. PLoS ONE 7: e38970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Naredo, J.M. 2004. La evolución de la agricultura en España (19402000). Granada: Universidad de Granada.

  36. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325: 419–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Oteros-Rozas, E., R. Ontillera-Sánchez, P. Sanosa, E. Gómez-Baggethun, V. Reyes-García, and J.A. González. 2013. Traditional ecological knowledge among transhumant pastoralists in Mediterranean Spain. Ecology and Society 18: 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Perrings, C., L. Jackson, K. Bawa, L. Brussaard, S. Brush, T. Gavin, R. Papa, U. Pascual, et al. 2006. Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: Saving natural capital without losing interest. Conservation Biology 20: 263–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pfeiffer, J.M., and R.J. Butz. 2005. Assessing cultural and ecological variation in ethnobiological research: The importance of gender. Journal of Ethnobiology 25: 240–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pilgrim, S., D. Smith, and J. Pretty. 2007. A cross-regional assessment of the factors affecting ecoliteracy: Implications for policy and practice. Ecological Applications 17: 1742–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Plieninger, T., F. Höchtl, and T. Spek. 2006. Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environmental Science & Policy 9: 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pretty, J., B. Adams, F. Berkes, S. Ferreira de Athayde, N. Dudley, E. Hunn, L. Maffi, K. Milton, et al. 2009. The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: Towards integration. Conservation and Society 7: 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pulido-Bosch, A., and Y. Ben Sbih. 1995. Centuries of artificial recharge on the southern edge of the Sierra Nevada (Granada, Spain). Environmental Geology 26: 57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rescia, A.J., B.A. Willaarts, M.F. Schmitz, and P.A. Aguilera. 2010. Changes in land uses and management in two Nature Reserves in Spain: Evaluating the social–ecological resilience of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 98: 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Reyes-García, V., S. Vila, L. Mata-Aceituno, L. Calvet-Mir, T. Garnatje, A. Jesch, J.J. Lastra, M. Parada, et al. 2010. Gendered homegardens: A study in three mountain areas of the Iberian Peninsula. Economic Botany 64: 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sánchez-Picón, A., J.A. Aznar-Sánchez, and J. García-Latorre. 2011. Economic cycles and environmental crisis in arid southeastern Spain. A historical perspective. Journal of Arid Environments 75: 1360–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sevilla Guzmán, E. 1979. La evolución del campesinado en España: elementos para una sociología política del campesinado. Barcelona: Ediciones Península.

  49. Tengö, M., E.S. Brondizio, T. Elmqvist, P. Malmer, and M. Spierenburg. 2014. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. AMBIO 43: 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Toledo, V.M., and N. Barrera-Bassols. 2008. La memoria biocultural. La importancia ecológica de las sabidurías tradicionales. Barcelona: Editorial Icaria.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the people from the Nacimiento Comarca and Cecilio Oyonarte who kindly collaborated with us during fieldwork. We thank Erik Gómez-Baggethun for his help during the early stages of the research. We also thank two anonymous reviewers, the editors and Marina García-Llorente for their inspiring comments on a previous draft. This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (project CGL2011-30266).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Iniesta-Arandia.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 69 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iniesta-Arandia, I., del Amo, D.G., García-Nieto, A.P. et al. Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds: Insights for environmental policies. AMBIO 44, 285–296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0556-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Drivers of change
  • Gender
  • Protected area
  • Semi-arid areas
  • Traditional agriculture
  • Traditional ecological knowledge