The role the Great Barrier Reef plays in resident wellbeing and implications for its management
- 708 Downloads
Improvements in human wellbeing are dependent on improving ecosystems. Such considerations are particularly pertinent for regions of high ecological, but also social and cultural importance that are facing rapid change. One such region is the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Although the GBR has world heritage status for its ‘outstanding universal value’, little is known about resident perceptions of its values. We surveyed 1545 residents, finding that absence of visible rubbish; healthy reef fish, coral cover, and mangroves; and iconic marine species, are considered to be more important to quality of life than the jobs and incomes associated with industry (most respondents were dissatisfied with the benefits they received from industry). Highly educated females placed more importance on environmental non-use values than other respondents; less educated males and those employed in mining found non-market use-values relatively more important. Environmental non-use values emerged as the most important management priority for all.
KeywordsAustralia GBRWHA IDS Perceptions Quality of life Values
This study was funded by the Tropical Ecosystems Hub, part of the Australian Government’s Commonwealth National Environmental Research Program. The NERP TE Hub is administered in North Queensland by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC). The NERP Tropical Ecosystem Hub addresses issues of concern for the management, conservation and sustainable use of the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and its catchments, tropical rainforests including the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area (WTWHA), and the terrestrial and marine assets underpinning resilient communities in the Torres Strait, through the generation and transfer of world-class research and shared knowledge. We wish to thank Ms Hana Sakata, Mr Leon Appo, and others for their help with data collection and entry. We also wish to thank the focus group participants, interviewees, and hundreds of anonymous householders who took the time to complete our survey: without their contribution this study would not be possible.
- Access Economics. 2007. Measuring the economic and financial value of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, 2006–2007. Great Barrier Reef Marine Protection Authority, Research Publication 98, Townsville.Google Scholar
- Blocker, T.J., and D.L. Eckberg. 1997. Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 General Social Survey. Social Science Quarterly 78: 841–858.Google Scholar
- Bord, R.J., and R.E. O’Connor. 1997. The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk: Research on the environment. Social Science Quarterly 78: 830–840.Google Scholar
- Deloitte Access Economics. 2013. Economic contribution of the Great Barrier Reef. Townsville: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.Google Scholar
- Dilman, D.A. 2007. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ferrier, R.C. 2007. Science challenges to support diffuse pollution management in the Great Barrier Reef. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, Flagship Fellow Report, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
- Government Statistician. 2013. Queensland regional profiles: Resident profile for the SLA4 and SLA3. Brisbane: Queensland Treasury and Trade.Google Scholar
- Kroon, F.J., P.M. Kuhnert, B.L. Henderson, S.N. Wilkinson, A. Kinsey-Henderson, B. Abbott, J. Brodie, and R.D.R. Turner. 2012. River loads of suspended solids, nitrogen, phosphorus and herbicides delivered to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Marine Pollution Bulletin 65: 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larson, S. 2010b. Understanding barriers to social adaptation: are we targeting the right concerns? In Transforming markets in the built environment: Adapting for climate change, ed. S. Roaf, 51–58. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Larson, S. 2011. From individual wellbeing to regional priorities: Concepts and measures to assist policy makers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
- Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- MA—Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: Global Assessment Reports. Washington, DC: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Google Scholar
- McCook, L.J., T. Ayling, M. Cappo, J.H. Choat, R.D. Evans, D.M. De Freitas, M. Heupel, T.P. Hughes, et al. 2010. Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: A globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 18278–18285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pantus, F., C.L. Barton, L. Bradford, and M. Stroet. 2011. Integrated science support for managing Australia’s tropical rivers: a case study in the Daly River catchment. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press.Google Scholar
- Rolfe, J., D. Gregg, and G. Tucker. 2011. Valuing local recreation in the Great Barrier Reef. Canberra: Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University.Google Scholar
- Roy, E. D., J. F. Martin, E. G. Irwin, J. D. Conroy, and D. A. Culver. 2010. Transient social-ecological stability: the effects of invasive species and ecosystem restoration on nutrient management compromise in Lake Erie. Ecology and Society, 15: 20. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art20/.
- Stoeckl, N., M. Farr, and H. Sakata. 2013. What do residents and tourists ‘value’ most in the GBRWHA? Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Report to the National Environmental Research Program, Cairns, Australia.Google Scholar
- TEEB. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Toropova, C., I. Meliane, D. Laffoley, E. Matthews, and M. Spalding ed. 2010. Global ocean protection: Present status and future possibilities. Brest: Agence des aires marines protégées.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. 2013. Retrieved April 1, 2014 from http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/4959.
- Wilkinson, C. 2004. Status of coral reef of the world. Townsville: Australian Institute of Marine Science.Google Scholar