On the scope and management of pesticide pollution of Swedish groundwater resources: The Scanian example
Twenty-three south-Swedish public supply wells were studied to assess pesticide pollution of regional groundwater resources. Relations between pesticide occurrence, hydrogeology, and land use were analyzed using Kohonen’s Self-Organizing Maps approach. Pesticides are demonstrated to be substantially present in regional groundwater, with detections in 18 wells. Concentrations above the drinking water threshold are confirmed for nine wells. Observations indicate considerable urban influence, and lagged effects of past, less restricted use. Modern, oxic waters from shallow, unconfined, unconsolidated or fracture-type bedrock aquifers appear particularly vulnerable. Least affected waters appear primarily associated with deeper wells, anoxic conditions, and more confined sediment aquifers lacking urban influence. Comprehensive, standardized monitoring of pesticides in groundwater need to be implemented nationwide to enable sound assessments of pollution status and trends, and to develop sound groundwater management plans in accordance with the Water Framework Directive. Further, existing water protection areas and associated regulations need to be reassessed.
KeywordsPesticides Groundwater Sweden Water framework directive Monitoring Self-organizing maps
This study was funded by Region Skåne, Länsstyrelsen Skåne, the Geological Survey of Sweden and participating municipalities and water organizations. The authors wish to thank H. Virgin for assistance in data collection, J. Sültenfuss for groundwater age discussions, C. Bertacchi-Uvo and K. Nishiyama for initial SOM guidance, and finally two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor G. Destouni for valuable feedback on the original manuscript.
- Åkesson, M., D. Bendz, C. Carlsson, C.J. Sparrenbom, and J. Kreuger. 2013. Modelling pesticide transport in a shallow groundwater catchment using tritium and helium-3 data. Applied Geochemistry. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.01.007.
- Barbash, J.E., and E.A. Resek. 1996. Pesticides in ground water: Distribution, trends and governing factors. Michigan: Ann Arbor Press.Google Scholar
- Brüsch, W. 2007. Public waterwork control of pesticides and metabolites. Copenhagen: GEUS, Arbejdsrapport fra Miljøstyrelsen Nr. 26. (in Danish).Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2012. Third implementation report on the River Basin management plans—Country-specific assessments, Sweden (SE). European Commission, Report SWD(2012)379, Brussels.Google Scholar
- European Environment Agency. 2004. Pesticides in groundwater. European Environment Agency, Indicator fact sheet WHS1a, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
- European Union. 2000. Council directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of European Communities L327: 1–73.Google Scholar
- European Union. 2006. Council directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration. Official Journal of the European Union L372: 19–31.Google Scholar
- Fraser, S.J., and B.L. Dickson. 2007. A New Method for Data Integration and Integrated Data Interpretation: Self-Organising Maps. In Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth international conference on mineral exploration, ed. B. Milkereit, 907–910.Google Scholar
- Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Englewoord Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Gustafsson, O. 2005. Description to the map of groundwater in Skåne. The Geological Survey of Sweden, Ah 15, Uppsala (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Jansson, C., and J. Kreuger. 2010. Multiresidue analysis of 95 pesticides at low nanogram/liter levels in surface waters using online preconcentration and high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of AOAC International 93(6): 1732–1747.Google Scholar
- Maxe, L., M. Gustafsson, and J. Kreuger. 2003. Pesticides in Scanian groundwater—Strategy for monitoring and environmental objective follow-up. County Administrative Board of Skåne, Report 2003:68, Malmö, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Neil, C.D., J.S. Williams, and T.K. Weddle. 1989. Report to the 114th Maine State Legislature Energy and Natural Resources Committee: Pilot pesticides in ground water study, final report. Maine Geological Survey, Open-File Report 89-2, Augusta.Google Scholar
- Nordberg, L., and G. Persson. 1974. The national groundwater network of Sweden. The Geological Survey of Sweden, Ca 48, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Sandberg, E. 2011. Plant protection products in agriculture and horticulture 2010. Statistics Sweden, MI 31 SM 1101. Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- SCB. 2010. Land use in Sweden 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.scb.se/.
- SEPA. 2013. The national environmental objectives—Yearly follow-up of Sweden’s environmental quality objectives and milestone targets 2013. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 6557, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- SGU. 2013:1. The Geological Survey of Sweden’s regulations on monitoring and assessment of groundwater. The Geological Survey of Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- SGU. 2013a. Environmental monitoring of groundwater. Geological Survey of Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden. Retrieved November 12, 2013, from http://www.sgu.se/sgu/sv/samhalle/miljo/miljoovervakning/overvakning-grundvatten.html.
- SGU. 2013b. Environmental quality criteria for groundwater. Geological Survey of Sweden, Report 2013:01, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- SLVFS 2001:30. The Swedish National Food Agency’s regulations on drinking water. Swedish National Food Agency, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- SMHI. 2014. The climate of Skåne. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.smhi.se/kunskapsbanken/meteorologi/skanes-klimat-1.4827.
- Solomon, D.K., and P.G. Cook. 2000. 3H and 3He. In Environmental tracers in subsurface hydrology, ed. P.G. Cook, and A.L. Herczeg, 397–424.Google Scholar
- Tesoriero, A.J., D.A. Saad, K.R. Burow, E.A. Frick, L.J. Puckett, and J.E. Barbash. 2007. Linking ground-water age and chemistry and chemistry data along flow paths: Implications for trends and transformations of nitrate and pesticides. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 94: 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thorling, L., B. Hansen, C. Langtofte, W. Brüsch, R.R. Møller, and S. Mielby. 2012. Groundwater—Status and development 1989–2011. GEUS, Teknisk rapport, Copenhagen (in Danish, English summary).Google Scholar
- Ultsch, A., and H.P Siemon. 1990. Kohonen’s self organizing feature maps for exploratory data analysis. In Proceedings of INNC-90, international neural network conference, ed. B. Widrow, and B. Angeniol, 305–308.Google Scholar
- Ultsch, A. 2004. U*-matrix: A tool to visualize clusters in high dimensional data. Philipps-Universität, Technical Report 36, Marburg.Google Scholar
- Virgin, H. 2012. Groundwater quality in Skåne Län—Assessment of regional monitoring 2007–2010. County Administrative Board of Skåne, Report 2012:12, Malmö, Sweden (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Wastenson, L., T. Germundsson, and P. Schlyter (Eds.). 1999. National Atlas of Sweden: Atlas of Skåne. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
- World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP). 2009. Water in a changing world. Third United Nations World Water Development Report, Paris.Google Scholar