Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 718–728 | Cite as

The Role of Social and Intergenerational Equity in Making Changes in Human Well-Being Sustainable

  • J. K. Summers
  • L. M. Smith
Review

Abstract

A sustainable world is one in which human needs are met equitably and without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Human well-being is described by four primary elements—basic human needs, economic needs, environmental needs, and subjective well-being. These elements can interact in a myriad of ways to influence overall well-being. What makes changes in human well-being sustainable for a population or a nation? Two major interactional concepts can push changes in human well-being toward a sustainable state in space and time—social equity and intergenerational equity. The concept of social equity distributes well-being over space, ensuring the fair treatment of all members of society promoting spatial sustainability of a well-being decision. The concept of intergenerational equity distributes well-being through time, ensuring the well-being of present and future generations of a population or nation, promoting temporal sustainability of a well-being decision. The roles of social and intergenerational equity in terms of their influence on human well-being are examined with a focus on more sustainable decision-making.

Keywords

Well-being Sustainability Social equity Environmental justice Intergenerational equity 

Notes

Disclaimer

The information in this document has been funded wholly (or in part) by the US Environmental Protection Agency. It has been subjected to review by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

References

  1. Agyeman, J. 2000. Environmental justice: From the margins to the mainstream? London: Town and Country Planning Association.Google Scholar
  2. Agyeman, J. 2001. Ethnic minorities in Britain: Short change, systematic indifference and sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 3: 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agyeman, J. 2002. Constructing environmental (in)justice: Transatlantic tales. Environmental Politics 11: 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agyeman, J., R. Bullard, and B. Evans. 2002. Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space and Polity 6: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agyeman, J., R. Bullard, and B. Evands. 2003. Just sustainabilities: Development in an unequal world. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Alcott, B. 2005. Jevons paradox. Ecological Economics 54: 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen, B.L. 2007. Environmental justice and expert knowledge in the wake of a disaster. Social Studies of Science 37: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azar, C., and J. Holmberg. 1995. Defining the generational environmental debt. Ecological Economics 14: 7–19.Google Scholar
  9. Below, T., A. Artner, R. Siebert, and S. Sieber. 2010. Microlevel practices to adapt to climate change for African small-scale farmers. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00953, Environment and Production Technology Department, IFPRI.Google Scholar
  10. Bentham, J. 1781/2000. The principles of morals and legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
  11. Bloomfield, J., M. Smith, and N. Thompson. 1999. Hot nights in the city: Global warming, sealevel rise and the New York metropolitan region. Washington, DC: Environmental Defense Fund.Google Scholar
  12. Boerner, C., and T. Lambert. 1994. Environmental justice? Center for the study of American business, policy study number 121. St. Louis: Washington University.Google Scholar
  13. Bonilla Garcia, A., and J.V. Gruat. 2003. Social protection: A life cycle continuum investment for social justice, poverty reduction and sustainable development. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  14. Bourgeois, L. 1902. L'Idée de solidarité et ses conséquences sociales [Trois conférences]. Alcan.Google Scholar
  15. Bronfenbrenner, M. 1973. Equality and equity. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 409: 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brosnan, S.F., and F.B.M. De Waal. 2003. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425: 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bullard, R.D. 1993. The threat of environmental racism. Natural Resources and Environment 7(23–26): 55–56.Google Scholar
  18. Bullard, R.D., P. Mohai, R. Saha, and B. Wright. 2007. Toxic wastes and race at twenty: 1987–2007: Grassroots struggles to dismantle environmental racism in the United States. United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries.Google Scholar
  19. Carter, N. 2005. Understanding sustainable development. http://www.fathom.com/course/21701763/session3.html.
  20. Coch, N.K. 1994. Hurricane hazards in the northeast U.S. Journal of Coastal Research 12: 115–147.Google Scholar
  21. Costanza, R., and C. Folke. 1994. Ecological economics and sustainable development. Paper prepared for the international experts meeting for operationalization of the economics of sustainability. Manila, Philippines, July 28–30, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. Costanza, R., and C. Folke. 1997. Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness and sustainability as goals. In Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, ed. G.C. Daly, 49–70. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dworkin, R. 1981a. What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 185–246.Google Scholar
  24. Dworkin, R. 1981b. What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 283–345.Google Scholar
  25. Elliott, J.R., and J. Pais. 2006. Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster. Social Science Research 35: 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eriksen, S., and K. Brown (eds.). 2011. Sustainable adaptation to climate change: Prioritising social equity and environmental integrity. Climate and Development 3: 3–85.Google Scholar
  27. Faber Taylor, A., A. Wiley, F.E. Kuo, and W.C. Sullivan. 1998. Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior 30: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faber Taylor, A.F., F.E. Kuo, and W.C. Sullivan. 2001a. Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environmental Behavior 33: 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Faber Taylor, A.F., F.E. Kuo, and W.C. Sullivan. 2001b. Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fehr, E., and U. Fischbacher. 2003. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425(785): 791.Google Scholar
  31. Fehr, E., and S. Gachter. 2000. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90: 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foot, D., and R. Venne. 2005. Awakening to the intergenerational equity debate in Canada. Journal of Canadian Studies 39: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frederickson, H.G. 1990. Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review 50: 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frumkin, H., J. Hess, G. Luber, J. Malilay, and M. McGeehin. 2008. Climate change: The public health response. American Journal of Public Health 98: 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Funtowicz, S., and J. Ravetz. 1994. Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 13: 1881–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Funtowicz, S., and J. Ravetz. 2003. Post-normal science. International Society for Ecological Economics (ed.), Online Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics. http://www.ecoeco.org/publica/encyc.htm.
  37. Gelobter, M. 1993. The meaning of urban environmental justice. Fordham Urban Law Journal 21: 840–956.Google Scholar
  38. Goodin, R.E. 1992. The ethics of selling environmental indulgences. Paper presented to Australasian Philosophical Association Annual Conference, University of Queensland, July, 1992.Google Scholar
  39. Goodin, R.E. 2006. Enfranchising the earth, and its alternatives. Political Studies 44: 835–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gordon, R. 2007. Climate change and the poorest nations: Further reflections on global inequality. University of Colorado Law Review 78: 1559–1624.Google Scholar
  41. Grint, K. 2010. The cuckoo clock syndrome: Addicted to command, allergic to leadership. European Management Journal 28: 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grosseries, A.P. 2001. What do we owe the next generation(s). Loyola of Los Angles Law Review 35: 293–354. http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol35/iss1/8.
  43. Grosseries, A.P. 2008. Theories of intergenerational justice: A synopsis. S.A.P.I.E.N.S.1.1. http://sapiens.revues.org/165.
  44. Harsanyi, J.C. 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hay, D. 2006. Economic arguments for action on the social determinants of health. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Kahn P.H., Jr. and S.R. Kellert. 2002. Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations. 348 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Kronik, J., D. Verner, R. Mearns, and A. Norton. 2010. The role of indigenous knowledge in crafting adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change in Latin America. In Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, ed. R. Mearns, and A. Norton, 145–172. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  48. Kuboniwa, M., and Y. Nishimura. 2005. Economics of intergenerational equity in transition economies, 369. Tokyo: Maruzen Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  49. Kuo, F. 2001. Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior 33: 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kuo, F.E., and A. Faber Taylor. 2004. A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from health promotion a national study. American Journal of Public Health 2004(94): 1580–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Louv, R. 2005. Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder, 390. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  52. Maantay, J., and A. Maroko. 2009. Mapping urban risk: Flood hazards, race, & environmental justice in New York. Applied Geography 29: 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maroko, A.R., J.A. Maantay, N.L. Sohler, K.L. Grady, and P.S. Arno. 2009. The complexities of measuring access to parks and physical activity sites in New York City: A quantitative and qualitative approach. International Journal of Health Geographics 8: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meadows, D. 1998. Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. Hartland, Four Corners (VT); The Sustainability Institute. http://www.sustainer.org/pubs/Indicators&Informations.pdf.
  55. Mearns, R., and A. Norton (eds.). 2010. Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, 232. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  56. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, F.P., A.F. Vandome, and J. McBrewster (eds.). 2010. Intergenerational equity, 82. Mauritius: Alphascript Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Mohai, P., and B. Bryant. 1992. Race, poverty and the environment. EPA Journal 18: 6–8.Google Scholar
  59. Moore, K.A., L. Lippman, and B. Brown. 2004. Indicators of child well-being: The promise for positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 591: 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. NEJAC (National Environmental Justice Advisory Council). 2004. ensuring risk reduction in communities with multiple stressors: Environmental justice and cumulative risks/impacts. http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/resources/publications/nejac/nejac-cum-risk-rpt-122104.pdf.
  61. NRC (National Research Council). 2011. Sustainability and the USEPA. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Polimeni, J.M., K. Mayumi, M. Giampeietro, and B. Alcott. 2008. The myth of resource efficiency: The Jevons Paradox. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  63. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Roemer, J.E. 1998. Equality of opportunity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Rydin, Y. 2005. Justice and the geography of Hurricane Katrina. Geoforum 37: 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Satchell, M. 1992. A whiff of discrimination? U.S. News & World Report 112: 34–35 (May 4, 1992).Google Scholar
  67. Sen, A. 1985. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, L.M., H.M. Smith and J.L. Case, L.C. Harwell and J.K. Summers. 2012. Indicators and methods for constructing a U.S. Human Well-being Index (HWBI) for ecosystem services research. EPA/600/R-12/023.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, L.M., L.C. Harwell, J.L. Case, H. Smith, and J.K. Summers. 2013. Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index. Ecological Indicators 28: 79–90.Google Scholar
  70. Stahl, C., and T.S. Bridges. 2013. “Fully baked” sustainability using decision analytic principles and ecosystem services. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 9: 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Summers, J.K., L.M. Smith, J.L. Case, and R.A. Linthurst. 2012. A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. AMBIO 41: 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tarlock, A.D. 1993. City versus countryside environmental equity in context. Fordham Urban Law Journal 21: 460–494.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, D. 2000. The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist 43: 508–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thompson, J. 2003. Intergeneration equity: Issues of principle in the allocation of social resources between this generation and the next, 23. Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library.Google Scholar
  75. Tobin, J. 1974. What is permanent endowment income? http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v64y1974i2p427-32.html.
  76. Torres, G. 1993. Environmental burdens and democratic justice. Fordham Urban Law Journal 21: 430–460.Google Scholar
  77. Tsosie, R. 2007. Indigenous people and environmental justice: The impact of climate change. University of Colorado Law Review 78: 1625–1677.Google Scholar
  78. United Church of Christ. 1987. Toxic wastes and race in the United States: A national report on the racial and socio-economic characteristics with hazardous waste sites. New York: United Church of Christ, Commission for Racial Justice.Google Scholar
  79. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992. Environmental equity: Reducing risk for all communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation.Google Scholar
  80. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012. Plan EJ 2014. http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/plan-ej/.
  81. United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2006. Fact sheet 2006: Flood hazards: A national threat. U.S. Department of Interior/U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  82. Weiss, E.B. 1990a. In fairness to future generations. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 32: 6–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weiss, E.B. 1990b. Our rights and obligations to future generations for the environment. The American Journal of International Law 84: 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Welbourne, M. 2006. The environmental justice movement’s response to Hurricane Katrina, a critique: Problems faced, successes, failures, and the state of the movement one year later. Thurgood Marshall Law Review 125: 125–145.Google Scholar
  85. Williams, A. 1997. Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the “fair innings” argument. Health Economics 6: 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. World Bank. 2005. World development report 2006: Equity and Development. World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gulf Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research LaboratoryUS Environmental Protection AgencyGulf BreezeUSA

Personalised recommendations