Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 963–974 | Cite as

Transboundary Socio-Ecological Effects of a Marine Protected Area in the Southwest Atlantic

  • Priscila F. M. Lopes
  • Renato A. M. Silvano
  • Vinicius A. Nora
  • Alpina Begossi
Article

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been regarded as an alternative to protect natural resources and to improve fisheries. However, MPAs may also have negative socio-economic consequences on fishing communities. We aimed to check the effectiveness of a socially conflicting MPA in Brazil by assessing target reef fish biomass in islands inside (n = 6) and outside (n = 6) the MPA, fisheries’ productivity (biomass), catch per unit of effort (CPUE), and fishers’ socio-economic status (mainly fishers’ income) in three fishing communities subjected to different degrees of influence (close, average, and long distance) of the MPA. The CPUE was higher in the fishing community that was further away from the MPA, fish biomass was higher in the islands located inside the MPA in the southern region and in the islands located outside the MPA in the northern region, while fishers were making the most money closest to the MPA, where conflicts are the highest, probably from practicing very intensive fisheries. This integrated approach showed that the studied MPA has not delivered ecological benefits, such as higher CPUE or more fish, while higher income closer to the MPA could not be clearly attributed to its effects.

Keywords

Small-scale fisheries Fisheries conflicts Reef fishes Ecosystem-based management Fish conservation Fisheries management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all the fishers and their families for supporting this study, allowing us to work in their communities, especially Sinésio, a fishmonger who let us use his space and provided valuable information. Special thanks to Robson Posidônio, a fisher from Trindade who sampled fish landings in his community and made our lives much easier by introducing us to fishers from his and other communities. Thanks to IDRC (Canada) and FAPESP (Brazil) for supporting this project (Grants Nos. 104519–004 and 2009/11154-3, respectively), to CNPq for research grants to R.A.M.S. (304377/2010-4) and to A.B., and to the FAPESP for research grant to R.A.M.S (2012/16722-2). P.F.M. Lopes thanks IDRC for an individual research grant.

Supplementary material

13280_2013_452_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 103 kb)

References

  1. Ali, A.B., and K.Y. Lee. 1995. Chenderoh Reservoir, Malaysia: A characterization of a small-scale, multigear and multispecies artisanal fishery in the tropics. Fisheries Research 23: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, E.H., and F. Ellis. 2001. The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 25: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begossi, A. 2010. Small-scale fisheries in Latin America: Management models and challenges. MAST 9: 5–12.Google Scholar
  4. Begossi, A., P.F.M. Lopes, L.E.C. Oliveira, and H. Nakano. 2010. Ecologia de Pescadores da Baia de Ilha Grande. Sao Carlos: Editora Rima.Google Scholar
  5. Begossi, A., P. May, P.F.M. Lopes, L.E.C. Oliveira, V. Vinha, and R. Silvano. 2011. Compensation for environmental services from artisanal fisheries in SE Brazil: Policy and technical strategies. Ecological Economics 71: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begossi, A., S.V. Salivonchyk, T. Barreto, V. Nora, and R.A.M. Silvano. 2012a. Small-scale Fisheries and Conservation of Dusky Grouper Garoupa), Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) in the Southeastern Brazilian Coast. Science Journal of Agricultural Research and Management 2012. doi: 10.7237/sjarm/174.
  7. Begossi, A., S. Salyvonchyk, V. Nora, P.F.M. Lopes, and R.A.M. Silvano. 2012b. The Paraty artisanal fishery (southeastern Brazilian coast): Ethnoecology and management of a social-ecological system (SES). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8: 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes, F., R. Mahon, P. McConney, R. Pollnac, and R. Pomeroy. 2006. Gestão da pesca de pequena escala: Diretrizes e metodos alternativos. Rio Grande: Editora Furg.Google Scholar
  9. Camargo, C., J.H. Maldonado, E. Alvarado, R. Moreno-Sánchez, S. Mendoza, N. Manrique, A. Mogollón, J.D. Osorio, et al. 2009. Community involvement in management for maintaining coral reef resilience and biodiversity in southern Caribbean marine protected areas. Biodiversity Conservation 18: 935–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castilla, J.C., S. Gelcich, and O. Defeo. 2007. Successes, lessons, and projections from Experience in marine benthic invertebrate artisanal fisheries in Chile. In Fisheries management progess towards sustainability, ed. T.R. McClanahan and J.C. Castilla, 25–42. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
  12. Costello, C., D. Ovando, R. Hilborn, S.D. Gaines, O. Deschenes, and S.E. Lester. 2012. Status and solutions for the World’s unassessed fisheries. Science 338: 517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawford, B.R., A. Siahainenia, C. Rotinsulu, and A. Sukmara. 2004. Compliance and enforcement of community-based coastal resource management regulations in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Coastal Management 32: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crawley, M.J. 2007. The R Book. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crona, B., M. Nystrom, C. Folke, and N. Jiddawi. 2010. Middlemen, a critical social-ecological link in coastal communities of Kenya and Zanzibar. Marine Policy 34: 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diegues, A. 1999. Human populations and coastal wetlands: Conservation and management in Brazil. Ocean Coastal Management 42: 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diegues, A.C. 2008. Marine protected areas and artisanal fisheries in Brazil. Chennai: Samudra Monograph, International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, P., and M.W. Palmer. 2003. Vegan, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 927–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, R., and G.R. Russ. 2004. Larger biomass of targeted reef fish in no-take marine reserves on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO. 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. Francini-Filho, R.B., and R.L. Moura. 2008. Evidence for spillover of reef fishes from a no-take marine reserve: An evaluation using the before-after control-impact (BACI) approach. Fisheries Research 93: 346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Froese, R., and D. Pauly, eds. 2011. Fishbase. World Wide Web electronic publication.Google Scholar
  23. Gell, F., and C.M. Roberts. 2003. Benefits beyond boundaries: The fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 448–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutiérrez, N.L., R. Hilborn, and O. Defeo. 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 2: 5–8.Google Scholar
  25. IUCN. 2013. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. Downloaded on 02 July 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Jagers, S.C., D. Berlin, and S. Jentoft. 2012. Why comply? Attitudes towards harvest regulations among Swedish fishers. Marine Policy 36: 969–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jentoft, S., and B.J. McCay. 1995. User participation in fisheries management: Lessons drawn from international experiences. Marine Policy 19: 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Le Fur, J., A. Guilavogui, and A. Teitelbaum. 2011. Contribution of local fishermen to improving knowledge of the marine ecosystem and resources in the Republic of Guinea, West Africa. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 68: 1454–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopes, P.F.M., R.A.M. Silvano, and A. Begossi. 2011. Extractive and Sustainable Development Reserves in Brazil: Resilient alternatives to fisheries? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54: 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lopes, P.F.M., E.M. Rosa, S. Salyvonchyk, V. Nora, and A. Begossi. 2013. Suggestions for fixing top-down coastal fisheries management through participatory approaches. Marine Policy 40: 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loucks, L. 2007. Patterns of fisheries institutional failure and success: Experience from the Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence snow crab fishery, in Nova Scotia, Canada. Marine Policy 31: 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  33. McCay, B.J. 1978. Systems ecology, people ecology, and the anthropology of fishing communities. Human Ecology 6: 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nielsen, J.R., and C. Mathiesen. 2003. Important factors influencing rule compliance in fisheries lessons from Denmark. Marine Policy 27: 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pauly, D. 2006. Major trends in small-scale marine fisheries, with emphasis on developing countries, and some implications for the social sciences. Maritime Studies 4: 7–12.Google Scholar
  36. Pontecorvo, G., and W.E. Schrank. 2001. A small core fishery: A new approach to fisheries management. Marine Policy 25: 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.
  38. Rosemberg, A.A. 2003. Managing to the margins: The overexploitation of fisheries. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sadovy, Y. 2001. The threat of fishing to highly fecund fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salas, S., R. Chuenpagdee, J.C. Seijo, and A. Charles. 2007. Challenges in the assessment and management of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Fisheries Research 87: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sale, P.F., R.K. Cowen, B.S. Danilowicz, G.P. Jones, J.P. Kritzer, K.C. Lindeman, S. Planes, N.V.C. Polunin, et al. 2005. Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scholz, A., K. Bonzon, R. Fujita, N. Benjamin, N. Woodling, P. Black, and C. Steinback. 2004. Participatory socioeconomic analysis: Drawing on fishermen’s knowledge for marine protected area planning in California. Marine Policy 28: 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silvano, R.A.M., and A. Begossi. 2012. Fishermen’s local ecological knowledge on Southeastern Brazilian coastal fishes: Contributions to research, conservation, and management. Neotropical Ichthyology 10: 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tuya, F.C., M.L. Soboil, and J. Kido. 2000. An assessment of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in the San Juan Islands, Washington, USA. Journal of Marine Sciences 57: 1218–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Worm, B., E.B. Barbier, N. Beaumont, J.E. Duffy, C. Folke, B.S. Halpern, J.B. Jackson, H.K. Lotze, et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Worm, B., R. Hilborn, J. K. Baum, T.A. Branch, J.S. Collie, C. Costello, M.J. Fogarty, E.A. Fulton, et al. 2009. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325: 578–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priscila F. M. Lopes
    • 1
  • Renato A. M. Silvano
    • 2
  • Vinicius A. Nora
    • 4
  • Alpina Begossi
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Departamento de BotânicaEcologia e Zoologia, UFRNNatalBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de EcologiaUFRGSPorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.UNICAMP (CAPESCA, LEPAC and CMU)Campinas, SPBrazil
  4. 4.Fisheries and Food Institute (FIFO)/ECOMAR/UNISANTASantosBrazil

Personalised recommendations