Skip to main content

Why are Prices in Wild Catch and Aquaculture Industries so Different?

AMBIO volume 42, pages 937–950 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Through a comparative analysis of prices in capture fisheries and aquaculture sectors, the objectives of this paper are a) to investigate three the trends in prices of forage catches to feed the aquaculture species, b) to analyze the amount of fish species need to feed aquaculture species in order to assess the level of efficiency in resource use, and c) to examine the degree of economic concentration either in wild-catch industry and aquaculture sectors. The results show that prices of cultivated species are higher than prices of the same species when harvested from the sea. We explain this fact by the interplay of three forces. First, the amount of wild fish to feed aquaculture species continues to improve over time. Second, the pressure of fishing activities has not been reduced since catches of most forage fishes are declining, which induce higher prices of capture species that feed aquaculture production. Third, the level of seafood market concentration is significantly higher in aquaculture than in wild catches, which generates higher prices in aquaculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Notes

  1. Two products are said to be substitutes if an increase (decrease) in the price of one leads to an increase (decrease) in the quantity consumed of the other.

  2. See http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en.

  3. See http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-aquaculture-production/en.

  4. See http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-commodities-production/en.

  5. The FCR is defined as the coefficient between capture from fisheries to feed aquaculture species. It particularly measures how many kilograms of wild fish does it take to produce 1 kg of farmed fish.

  6. The major advantage of the Herfindahl index over the concentration rate is that the former, but not the latter, gives more weight to larger firms.

  7. See http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg-2010.html.

  8. Recall that the FCR refers how much of fish harvested from wild fisheries it takes to produce 1 kg of farmed fish (see Footnote 5).

  9. To take an example, the growth of the monthly average price of the main small pelagic species (Globefish 2011a, b, 2013a, b) was as follows: (a) world imports of canned sardines: US$ 0.43 per kg in 1999 to US$ 0.86 per kg in 2009, (b) world imports of fresh and frozen herring: US$ 0.48 per kg in 1999 to US$ 0.76 per kg in 2009, (c) whole herring prices (in Norway, origin Norway): US$ 0.40 per kg in 1999 to US$ 1.35 in 2009, (d) world imports of fresh and frozen mackerel: US$ 0.66 per kg in 1999 to US$ 1.04 in 2009, (e) fresh herring (Sardinella eba): US$ 0.77 per kg in mid 2005 to US$ 1.77 per kg in mid 2011, (f) fresh horse mackerel: US$ 0.42 per kg in 1999 to US$ 1.17 per kg in 2009, (g) canned sardines in oil skinless/boneless: US$ 40 per kg in 1999 to US$ 52 per tonne in 2013.

References

  • Agnew, D., J. Pearce, G. Pramod, R. Watson, J.R. Beddington, and T.J. Pitcher. 2009. Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLoS ONE 4: 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alder, J., B. Campbell, V. Karpouzi, K. Kaschner, and D. Pauly. 2008. Forage fish: From ecosystems to markets. Annual Reviews in Environment and Resources 33: 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alegria, C., and K. Schaek. 2009. On measuring concentration in banking systems. Finance Research Letters 5: 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asche, F., and S. Tveterås, S. 2005. Market interactions in aquaculture. European Association of Agricultural Economists, 95th Seminar, December 9–10, 2005, Civitavecchia, Italy.

  • Asche, F., A.G. Guttormsen, T. Sebulonsen, and E. Sissener. 2005. Competition between farmed and wild salmon: The Japanese salmon market. Agricultural Economics 33: 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, L., S. Libralato, T. Pitcher, C. Solidoro, and S. Tudela. 2013. Sustainability implications of honouring the Cod of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Global Environmental Change 23: 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, T.F.G., G. Lohmann, and A.V.M. Oliveira. 2010. A model to identify airport hubs and their importance to tourism. Research in Transportation Economics 26: 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, L., S. Graslund, C. Folke, M. Troell, M. Huitric, N. Kautsky, and L. Lebeld. 2007. Feeding aquaculture growth through globalization: Exploitation of marine ecosystems for fishmeal. Global Environmental Change 17: 238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doane, M.J., R. Preston McAfee, A. Nayyar, and M.A. Williams. 2008. Interpreting concentration indices in the secondary market for natural gas transportation: The implication of pipeline residual rights. Energy Economics 30(3): 807–817.

  • European Commission. 2002. Communication from the Commission on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (“Roadmap”), COM (2002) 181 final, Brussels, May 28.

  • Fabinyi, M. 2012. Historical, cultural and social perspectives on luxury seafood consumption in China. Environmental Conservation 39: 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2012a. FAO Fisheries Yearbook 2010. Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics. Rome, Italy: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2012b. State of the World’s Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. Rome, Italy: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2013a. Global Aquaculture Production. Retrieved 15 April, 2013, from http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-aquaculture-production/en.

  • FAO. 2013b. FAO FishStatJ. Retrieved 15 April, 2013, from http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en.

  • Farinotti, M., S. Simi, C. Di Pietrantonj, L. Brait, and G. Filippini. 2012. Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database System Review CD004192.

  • Fernández-Polanco, J., I. Llorente, L. Luna, and J.L. Fernández Luna. 2012. El mercado de productos pesqueros en España. Globefish Research Programme No. 106. FAO, Rome.

  • Fernández-Polanco, J., J. Silva, and A. Briones. 2013. Retail concentration in the Spanish seafood market. In Aquaculture 2013, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

  • Froese, R., & D. Pauly (eds.). 2013. FishBase. Retrieved July 1, 2013, from www.fishbase.org.

  • Globefish. 2011a. Mackerel. Commodity update, 31 pp. FAO, Rome.

  • Globefish. 2011b. Herring. Commodity update, 30 pp. FAO, Rome.

  • Globefish. 2013a. Fishmeal–Fish oil. Commodity update, 44 pp. FAO, Rome.

  • Globefish. 2013b. Sardines. Commodity update, 35 pp. FAO, Rome.

  • Halpern, B.S., C. Longo, D. Hardy, K.L. McLeod, J.F. Samhouri, S.K. Katona, K. Kleisner, S.E. Lester, et al. 2012. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488: 615–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanesson, R. 2003. Aquaculture and fisheries. Marine Policy 27: 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartweg, J., R. Perera, V. Montori, S. Dinneen, H.A. Neil, and A. Farmer. 2008. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1): CD003205.

  • Heggberget, T.G., B.O. Johnsen, K. Hindar, B. Jonsson, L.P. Hansen, N.A. Hvidsten, and A.J. Jensen. 1993. Interactions between wild and cultured Atlantic Salmon: A review of the Norwegian experience. Fisheries Research 8: 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmer, S., and L. Warrel. 2009. On the evaluation of market power and market dominance: The Nordic electricity market. Energy Policy 37: 3235–3241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1964. The paternity of an index. American Economic Review 54: 761–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFFO. 2013. Is aquaculture growth putting pressure on feed fish stocks? And is the growth of aquaculture being restricted by finite supplies of fishmeal and fish? Retrieved 15 July, 2013, from http://www.iffo.net/default.asp?contentID=817.

  • Kleih, U., J. Linton, A. Marr, M. Mactaggart, D. Naziri, and J.E. Orchard. 2013. Financial services for small and medium-scale aquaculture and fisheries producers. Marine Policy 37: 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristofersson, D., and J.L. Anderson. 2006. Is there a relationship between fisheries and farmed? Interdependence of fisheries, animal production and aquaculture. Marine Policy 30: 721–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, W.S., J.K. Gammack, J. Van Niekerk, and A.D. Dangouer. 2006. Omega 3 fatty acid for the prevention of dementia. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1): CD005379.

  • Lin, P.Y., and K.P. Su. 2007. A meta-analytic review of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressant efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 68: 1056–1061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liston-Hayes, C., and A. Pilkington. 2004. Inventive concentration: Analysis of fuel cell patents. Science and Public Policy 31(1): 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, C.H., S.J. Newberry, W.A. Mojica, P. Khanna, A.M. Issa, M.J. Suttorp, Y.W. Lim, and S.B. Traina. 2006. Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cancer risk: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 295: 403–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merino, G., M. Barange, J.L. Blanchard, J. Harle, R. Holmes, I. Allen, E.H. Allison, and M.C. Badjeck. 2013. Can marine fisheries and aquaculture meet fish demand from a growing human population in a changing climate? Global Environmental Change 22: 795–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.E. 2011. Transitions and resilience in the frozen commons: linking aquaculture, krill fishery, governance and ecosystem change in the Scotia Sea, Southern Ocean, 104 pp. Master’s Thesis, Stockholm University.

  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAM). 2013. Datos de Consumo de Hogar del Panel de Consumo Alimentario. Retrieved 9 July, 2013, from http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/consumo-y-comercializacion-y-distribucion-alimentaria/panel-de-consumo-alimentario/base-de-datos-de-consumo-en-hogares/consulta.asp.

  • Natale, F., J. Hofherr, G. Fiore, and J. Virtanen. 2013. Interactions between aquaculture and fisheries. Marine Policy 38: 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R.L., R.J. Goldburg, J.H. Primavera, N. Kautsky, M.C. Beveridge, J. Clay, C. Folke, J. Lubchencho, et al. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R.L., R.W. Hardy, D.P. Bureau, A. Chiu, M. Elliott, A.P. Farrell, I. Forster, D.M. Gatlin, et al. 2009. Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 8: 15103–15110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oken, E., A.L. Choi, M.R. Karagas, K. Mariën, C.M. Rheinberger, R. Schoeny, E. Sunderland, and S. Korrick. 2012. Which fish should I eat? Perspectives influencing fish consumption. Environmental Health Perspective 120: 790–798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omar, I., and M. Bechardas. 2012. Overview of aquaculture in Mozambique. Workshop on Rural aquaculture as vehicle to eradicate poverty in Africa, Spanish Agency for Cooperation and Development (AECID), Maputo, October 24–27, 2012.

  • Rodríguez, G., R. Bande, and S. Villasante. 2013. Origins matter. (No) market integration between cultured and wild gilthead sea bream in the Spanish seafood market. Aquaculture Management and Economics 17(4).

  • Simmer, K., S.M. Schulzke, and S. Patole S. 2008. Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in preterm infants. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Review (1): CD000375.

  • Tacon, A.G.J., and M. Metian. 2008. Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285: 146–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tacon, A.G.J., and M. Metian. 2009. Fishing for feed or fishing for food: Increasing global competition for small pelagic forage fish. AMBIO 38: 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tacon, A.G.J., M. Metian, and G.M. Turchini. 2010. Responsible aquaculture and trophic level implications to global fish supply. Review of Fisheries Science 18: 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tveterås, S., F. Asche, M.F. Bellemare, M.D. Smith, A.G. Guttormsen, A. Lem, K. Lien, and S. Vannuccini. 2012. Fish is food—The FAO’s Fish Price Index. PLoS ONE 7: e36731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valderraman, D., and J.L. Anderson. 2010. Market interactions between aquaculture and common-property fisheries: Recent evidence from the Bristol Bay sockeye salmon fishery in Alaska. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59: 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasante, S., D. Rodríguez, M. Antelo, M. Quaas, and H. Österblom. 2012. The Global Seafood Market Performance Index: A theoretical proposal and potential empirical applications. Marine Policy 36: 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasante, S., D. Rodríguez, M. Antelo, S. Rivero-Rodríguez, J.A. de Santiago, and G. Macho. 2013. All fish for China? AMBIO. doi:10.1007/s13280-013-0448-9.

  • Woods, R.K., F.C. Thien, and M.J. Abramson. 2002. Dietary marine fatty acids (fish oil) for asthma in adults and children. The Cochrane Database of Systems Reviews (3): CD001283.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Bo Söderström (Editor-in-Chief of AMBIO) for his generous and helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved this paper. They also thank Helga Josupeit (FAO) for providing valuable data and information, as well as participants in the Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures (Santiago de Chile, May 14–17th 2012) organized by the UNEP Program and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) for insightful discussions and suggestions. SV was funded by Campus do Mar-International Campus of Excellence and the Norwegian Research Council. SRR is grateful to the financial support from the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Santiago de Compostela, Av. Burgo Nacións s/n, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

    Sebastián Villasante, David Rodríguez-González, Manel Antelo, Susana Rivero-Rodríguez & Joseba Lebrancón-Nieto

  2. Campus do Mar, International Campus of Excellence, Vigo, Spain

    Sebastián Villasante

Authors
  1. Sebastián Villasante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Rodríguez-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manel Antelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susana Rivero-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseba Lebrancón-Nieto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastián Villasante.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villasante, S., Rodríguez-González, D., Antelo, M. et al. Why are Prices in Wild Catch and Aquaculture Industries so Different?. AMBIO 42, 937–950 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0449-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0449-8

Keywords

  • Global seafood markets
  • Wild fisheries
  • Aquaculture
  • Prices
  • Economic concentration