Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 614–624 | Cite as

Positive Interactions Between Irrawaddy Dolphins and Artisanal Fishers in the Chilika Lagoon of Eastern India are Driven by Ecology, Socioeconomics, and Culture

  • Coralie D’Lima
  • Helene Marsh
  • Mark Hamann
  • Anindya Sinha
  • Rohan Arthur
Report

Abstract

In human-dominated landscapes, interactions and perceptions towards wildlife are influenced by multidimensional drivers. Understanding these drivers could prove useful for wildlife conservation. We surveyed the attitudes and perceptions of fishers towards threatened Irrawaddy dolphins (Orcaella brevirostris) at Chilika Lagoon India. To validate the drivers of fisher perceptions, we : (1) observed dolphin foraging behavior at stake nets, and (2) compared catch per unit effort (CPUE) and catch income of fishers from stake nets in the presence and absence of foraging dolphins. We found that fishers were mostly positive towards dolphins, believing that dolphins augmented their fish catch and using culture to express their perceptions. Foraging dolphins were observed spending half their time at stake nets and were associated with significantly higher catch income and CPUE of mullet (Liza sp.), a locally preferred food fish species. Wildlife conservation efforts should use the multidimensional drivers of human–wildlife interactions to involve local stakeholders in management.

Keywords

Human–wildlife interactions Fisher perceptions Dolphin behavior Fisher livelihoods Orcaella brevirostris Fish catch 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the state Forest Department of Odisha for providing permits to conduct this study. We also thank D. Sutaria for providing initial logistic support and advice, and N. Ban and two anonymous reviewers for comments on this manuscript. We are sincerely grateful to the numerous team members and field assistants who helped conduct the field work for this study. We thank the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, the Society for Marine Mammalogy, The Rufford Foundation and the Conservation Leadership Program for funding the field work of this study. James Cook University, Australia and Nature Conservation Foundation, India are thanked for institutional and logistic support provided to the first author.

Supplementary material

13280_2013_440_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1242 kb)
13280_2013_440_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (13 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 13 kb)
13280_2013_440_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (19 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 20 kb)
13280_2013_440_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (20 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 21 kb)
13280_2013_440_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (16 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 16 kb)

References

  1. Adams, W.M., R. Aveling, D. Brockington, B. Dickson, J. Elliott, J. Hutton, D. Roe, B. Vira, et al. 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 1146–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1992. The Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. Deharadun: Natraj Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F. 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 15188–15193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes, F. 2008. Context of traditional ecological knowledge. In Sacred ecology, ed. F. Berkes, 209 pp. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockington, D., J. Igoe, and K. Schmidt-Soltau. 2006. Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology 20: 250–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks, T.M., S.J. Wright, and D. Sheil. 2009. Evaluating the success of conservation actions in safeguarding tropical forest biodiversity. Conservation Biology 23: 1448–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, L.H., D.J. Decker, and J.F. Lipscomb. 2000. Stakeholder acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickman, A.J. 2010. Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation 13: 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evely, A.C., I. Fazey, M. Pinard, and X. Lambin. 2008. The influence of philosophical perspectives in integrative research: A conservation case study in the Cairngorms National Park. Ecology and Society 13: 52.Google Scholar
  12. Ferreira, T., and W. Rasband. 2011. The ImageJ User Guide 1.44. Retrieved March 5, 2012, from http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/docs/user-guide.pdf.
  13. Freitas, D., J. Gomes, T.S. Luis, L. Madruga, C. Marques, G. Baptista, L.M. Rosalino, P. Antunes, et al. 2007. Otters and fish farms in the Sado estuary: Ecological and socio-economic basis of a conflict. Hydrobiologia 587: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Froese, R., and D. Pauly. 2011. FishBase. Retrieved March 1, 2012, from http://www.fishbase.org/search.php.
  15. Garibaldi, A., and N. Turner. 2004. Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9: 1.Google Scholar
  16. Gazda, S.K., R.C. Connor, R.K. Edgar, and F. Cox. 2005. A division of labour with role specialization in group hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar key, Florida. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272: 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghosh, A.K., A.K. Pattnaik, and T.J. Ballatore. 2006. Chilika lagoon: Restoring ecological balance and livelihoods through re-salination. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management 11: 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gómez-Pompa, A., and A. Kaus. 1992. Taming the Wilderness Myth. BioScience 42: 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gravena, W., T. Hrbek, V.M.F. Da Silva, and I.P. Farias. 2008. Amazon River dolphin love fetishes: From folklore to molecular forensics. Marine Mammal Science 24: 969–978.Google Scholar
  20. Harrison, K., and J. Cantor. 1999. Tales from the screen: Enduring fright reactions to scary media. Media Psychology 1: 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huntington, H.P. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10: 1270–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Infield, M. 2001. Cultural values: A forgotten strategy for building community support for protected areas in Africa. Conservation Biology 15: 800–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IUCN. 2012. Retrieved March 5, 2012, from http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/15419/0.
  24. Kemper, C.M., D. Pemberton, M. Cawthorn, S. Heinrich, J. Mann, B. Wuersig, P. Shaughnessy, and R. Gales. 2003. Aquaculture and marine mammals: Co-existence or conflict? In Marine mammals: Fisheries, tourism and management issues, ed. N. Gales, M. Hindell, and R. Kirkwood, 446 pp. Collingwood: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, J.S., and W.W. Shroeder. 2003. Mud plume feeding, a unique foraging behaviour of the bottlenose dolphin in the Florida keys. Gulf of Mexico Science 21: 92–95.Google Scholar
  26. Nayak, P.K., and F. Berkes. 2010. Whose marginalisation? Politics around environmental injustices in India’s Chilika Lagoon. Local Environment 15: 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neff, C. 2011. Let’s hear it for the sharks. The New Scientist 212: 28–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orams, M.B. 1997. Historical accounts of human–dolphin interaction and recent developments in wild dolphin based tourism in Australasia. Tourism Management 18: 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Passariello, P. 1999. Me and my totem: Cross-cultural attitudes towards animals. In Attitudes to animals: Views in animal welfare, ed. F.L. Dolins, 263 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Patel, K.C. 1994. Women, Earth, and the Goddess: A Shākta-Hindu interpretation of embodied religion. Hypatia 9: 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pattanaik, S. 2007. Conservation of environmental and protection of marginalized fishing communities of Lake Chilika in Orissa, India. Journal of Human Ecology 22: 291–302.Google Scholar
  32. Pattnaik, A.K., D. Sutaria, M. Khan, and B.P. Behera. 2007. Review of the status and conservation of Irrawaddy Dolphins Orcaella brevirostris in Chilika Lagoon of India. In Status and conservation of freshwater populations of Irrawaddy dolphins, ed. B.D. Smith, R.G. Shore, and A. Lopez, 115 pp. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.Google Scholar
  33. Peterson, M.N., J.L. Birckhead, K. Leong, M.J. Peterson, and T.R. Peterson. 2010. Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters 3: 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Piepho, H.P., A. Büchse, and K. Emrich. 2003. A Hitchhiker’s Guide to mixed models for randomized experiments. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189: 310–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rajagopalan, R. 2008. Marine protected areas in India. In Samudra monograph, ed. K.G. Kumar, 69 pp. Chennai: International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.Google Scholar
  36. Rinzin, C., W.J.V. Vermeulen, M.J. Wassen, and P. Glasbergen. 2009. Nature conservation and human well-being in Bhutan: An assessment of local community perceptions. The Journal of Environment & Development 18: 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanderson, S.E., and K.H. Redford. 2003. Contested relationships between biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation. Oryx 37: 389–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sekhar, N.U. 2004. Fisheries in Chilika Lake: How community access and control impacts their management. Journal of Environmental Management 73: 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shen, X., S. Li, N. Chen, S. Li, W.J. McShea, and Z. Lu. 2012. Does science replace traditions? Correlates between traditional Tibetan culture and local bird diversity in Southwest China. Biological Conservation 145: 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, B.D., M.T. Tun, A.M. Chit, H. Win, and T. Moe. 2009. Catch composition and conservation management of a human–dolphin cooperative cast-net fishery in the Ayeyarwady River, Myanmar. Biological Conservation 142: 1042–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stacey, P.J., and G.T. Hvenegaard. 2002. Habitat use and behaviour of Irrawaddy Dolphins (Orcaella brevirostris) in the Mekong River of Laos. Aquatic Mammals 28: 1–13.Google Scholar
  42. Sutaria, D. 2009. Species conservation in a complex socio-ecological system: Irrawaddy dolphins, Orcaella brevirostris in Chilika lagoon, India. PhD thesis. Townsville, Australia: James Cook University.Google Scholar
  43. Sutaria, D., and H. Marsh. 2011. Abundance estimates of Irrawaddy dolphins in Chilika Lagoon, India, using photo-identification based mark-recapture methods. Marine Mammal Science 27: E338–E348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Telesco, P., and R. Hall. 2002. Animal spirit: Spells, sorcery, and symbols from the wild. Franklin Lakes: Career Press.Google Scholar
  45. West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2006. Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White, R.M., A. Fischer, K. Marshall, J.M.J. Travis, T.J. Webb, S.D. Falco, S.M. Redpath, and R. van der Wal. 2009. Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts. Land Use Policy 26: 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wickens, P.A. 1996. Conflict between Cape (South African) fur seals and line fishing operations. Wildlife Research 23: 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodroffe, R., S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz. 2005. The impact of human–wildlife conflict on natural systems. In People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence?, ed. R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz, 497 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zappes, C.A., A. Andriolo, P.C. Simões-Lopes, and A.P.M. Di Beneditto. 2011. ‘Human–dolphin (Tursiops truncatus Montagu, 1821) cooperative fishery’ and its influence on cast net fishing activities in Barra de Imbé/Tramandaí, Southern Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Management 54: 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Coralie D’Lima
    • 1
    • 2
  • Helene Marsh
    • 1
  • Mark Hamann
    • 1
  • Anindya Sinha
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rohan Arthur
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Oceans and Coasts ProgrammeNature Conservation FoundationMysoreIndia
  3. 3.School of Natural Sciences and EngineeringNational Institute of Advanced StudiesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations