, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 767–775 | Cite as

Community Management of Natural Resources: A Case Study from Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar

  • Benoît G. P. Aymoz
  • Vololomboahangy R. Randrianjafy
  • Zarasoa J. N. Randrianjafy
  • Damase P. Khasa


We analyzed the management, resource use and conservation of the Ankarafantsika National Park (Madagascar) to develop a management plan, which provides a sustainable development strategy of the area while empowering the local residents. Using qualitative methodology we performed interviews with villagers and local organizations to assess the park’s successes and failures from local stakeholders’ perspectives. People living in a village with a permanent Madagascar National Parks (MNP) agent are more favorable to and supportive of the park conservation. People living in the park are supportive but are more divided. On the other hand, people living on the periphery of the park see conservation as more of a burden. Strategies like more equitable distribution of wealth, environment improvement and decentralization of power are discussed to achieve a more sustainable management plan based on community natural resources management. Short-term, medium, and long-term interventions from park authorities are needed to ensure the cooperation of local people in conservation endeavors.


Community management Rural development Decentralization Qualitative methodology 



The authors wish to warmly thank the Parc National d’Ankarafantsika and all the MNP staff and organizations that made this study possible. We also want to thank the University of Mahajanga and particularly Rasoanirina Gislaine Elysée and Tombozamila Roland for their translations and their cultural mediation. We would also like to thank Narayan Dhital of Université Laval and anonymous reviewers who helped improve this manuscript. The funding for the study was provided, with the help of the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (AUCC) through the Canada-Africa Research Exchange Grants program supported by the International Development Research Centre.


  1. Abbot, J.I.O., D.H.L. Thomas, A.A. Gardner, S.E. Neba, and M.W. Khen. 2001. Understanding the links between conservation and development in the Bamenda Highlands, Cameroon. World Development 29: 1115–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adetoro, A.O., M.S. Lawal, and A. Jenyo-Oni. 2011. Biodiversity conservation and community participation in Kainji Lake National Park, Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research 2: 218–226.Google Scholar
  3. Albignac, R., G.S. Ramangason, V.S. Rakotonirina, S. Andriatsarafara, and H. Rabetaliana 1992. Ecodéveloppement des Communautés Rurales pour la Conservation de la Biodiversité. Plaquette. UNESCO/PNUD. Tsipika Editeur Antananarivo.Google Scholar
  4. ANGAP (Association Nationale de Gestion des Aires Protégées). 2000. Plan d’Aménagement et de Gestion: 20012005. Parcs Nationaux Madagascar, 89 pp.Google Scholar
  5. ANGAP (Association Nationale de Gestion des Aires Protégées). 2001. Plan de Gestion du Réseau National des Aires Protégées de Madagascar. Parcs Nationaux Madagascar, 112 pp.Google Scholar
  6. ANGAP (Association Nationale de Gestion des Aires Protégées). 2007. Plan d’Affaires. Parcs Nationaux Madagascar, 34 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Brydon-Miller, M. 1997. Participatory action research: Psychology and social change. Journal of Social Issues 53: 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunch, R. 1992. Two ears of corn. Oklahoma City: World Neighbors.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, K.M.A., R.M. Pringle, J. Ranganathan, C.L. Boggs, Y.L. Chan, P.R. Ehrlich, P.K. Haff, N.E. Heller, et al. 2007. When agendas collide: Human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 59–68.Google Scholar
  10. Creswell, J.W. 1994. Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Dinerstein, E. 2003. The return of the Unicorns: The natural history and conservation of the greater one-horned rhinoceros, vol. xi, 316 pp. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ganzhorn, J.U., and J.P. Sorg. 1996. Ecology and economy of a tropical dry forest in Madagascar. Primate Report, Special Issue 46: 1–382.Google Scholar
  13. Garcia, G., and S.M. Goodman. 2003. Short communication: Hunting of protected animals in the Parc National d’Ankarafantsika, north-western Madagascar. Oryx 37: 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, C.C., J.T. Williams, and E. Ostrom. 2005. Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33: 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodman, S.M., and J.P. Benstead. 2005. Short communication: Updated estimates of biotic diversity and endemism for Madagascar. Oryx 39: 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwood, D.J., and M. Levin. 1998. Introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Hannah, L., B. Rakotosamimanana, J. Ganzhorn, R.A. Mittermeier, S. Olivieri, L. Iyer, S. Rajaobellina, J. Hough, et al. 1998. Participatory planning, scientific priorities, and landscape conservation in Madagascar. Environmental Conservation 25: 30–36.Google Scholar
  18. Hannah, L., R. Dave, P.P. Lowry II, S. Andelman, M. Andrianarisata, L. Andriamaro, A. Cameron, R. Hijmans, et al. 2008. Climate change adaptation for conservation in Madagascar. Biology Letters 4: 590–594. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harper, G.J., M.K. Steininger, C.J. Tucker, D. Juhn, and F. Hawkins. 2007. Fifty years of deforestation and forest fragmentation in Madagascar. Environmental Conservation 34: 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, T.M. 2006. Parks, people, and forest protection: An institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 34: 2064–2075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmes, C.M. 2003. Assessing the perceived utility of wood resources in a protected area of Western Tanzania. Biological Conservation 111: 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Institut National de la Statistique de Madagascar. 2006. Troisième Recensement Général de la Population et de l’Habitat: Madagascar 20032009, 10 pp. Repoblikan’i Madagasikara, Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et du Budget.Google Scholar
  23. Jenkins, R.K.B., L.D. Brady, M. Bisoa, J. Rabearivony, and R.A. Griffith. 2003. Forest disturbance and river proximity influence chameleon abundance in Madagascar. Biological Conservation 109: 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kellert, S.R., J.N. Mehta, S.A. Ebbin, and L.L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 1: 705–715.Google Scholar
  25. McConnell, W.J. 2002. Misconstrued land use in Vohibazaha: Participatory planning in the periphery of Madagascar’s Mantadia National Parks. Land Use Policy 19: 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mittermeier, R.A., J.A. McNeely, K.R. Miller, W.V. Reid, and T.B. Werner. 1990. Conserving the World’s Biological Diversity, 193 pp. Washington, DC: Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund, IUCN, WRI and World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Mittermeier, R.A., P.R. Gil, M. Hoffmann, J. Pilgrim, T. Brooks, C.G. Mittermeier, J. Lamoureux, and G.A.B. Da Fonseca. 2004. HOTSPOTS Revisited. Mexico City: CEMEX.Google Scholar
  28. Myers, N. 1988. Threatened biotas: “Hot spots” in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8: 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ormsby, A., and B.A. Kaplin. 2005. A framework for understanding community resident perceptions of Masoala National Park, Madagascar. Environmental Conservation 32: 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perez, F. 1992. Réflexion sur la Redéfinition des Limites de la Réserve Forestière de l’Ankarafantsika. Rapport pour le PNUD/UNESCO, 76 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Pons, P., and C. Wendenburg. 2005. The impact of fire and forest conversion into savannah on the bird communities of West Madagascar dry forests. Animal Conservation 8: 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pons, P., G. Rakotobearison, and C. Wendenburgs. 2003. Immediate effects of a fire on birds and vegetation at Ankarafantsika Strict Nature Reserve, BW Madagascar. Ostrich 74: 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Post, J., and M. Snel. 2003. The impact of decentralised forest management on charcoal production practices in Eastern Senegal. Geoforum 34: 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rakotoarimanana, J. 2005. Analyse des Données sur les Délits et Rapport de Délits en 2004. Parcs Nationaux Madagascar, 58 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Ramanahadray, F., Randrianasolo, M., Rabenatoandro, T., and Solofomihanta, T.F.T., 2010. Paroles photographiques de la Biodiversité. Sténo’Art—Conservation International.Google Scholar
  36. Raondry, N., M. Klein, and V.S. Rakotonirina. 1995. La réserve de la biosphère de Mananara-Nord 19871994: Bilan et perspective (Document de travail N°6), UNESCO, Paris, 75 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Raymond, I. 2007. Rapport de l’Evolution des Menaces des Aires Protégées en 2006. Parcs Nationaux Madagascar, 22 pp.Google Scholar
  38. SAS Institute Inc. 2005. SAS ® 9.1.3 Language Reference: Concepts, 3rd ed. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Sheddon, N., J. Tibias, J.W. Yount, J.R. Ramanampamonjy, S. Butchart, and H. Randrianizahana. 2008. Conservation issues and priorities in the Mikea Forest of south-west Madagascar. Oryx 34: 287–304.Google Scholar
  40. Songorwa, A.N. 1999. Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the communities interested? World Development 27: 2061–2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Songorwa, A.N. 2008. Community-based wildlife management in Tanzania: The policy environment. Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation 75: 1–16.Google Scholar
  42. Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie, and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 3rd ed. USA: McGraw-Hill series in probability and statistics.Google Scholar
  43. Stoll-Kleemann, S., and M. Welp. 2008. Participatory and integrated management of biosphere reserves: Lessons from case studies and a global survey. GAIA 17: 161–168.Google Scholar
  44. Straede, S., and T. Treue. 2006. Beyond buffer zone protection: a comparative study of park and buffer zone products’ importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone. Journal of Environmental Management 78: 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. TRM (Table Ronde Marovoay). 1997. Exploitation des Procédures Judiciaires de Répression des Délits Forestiers pour la Conservation des Aires Protégées de l’Ankarafantsika. Conservation International, 10 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Tucker, B. 2007. Applying behavioural ecology and behavioural economics to conservation and development planning: An example from the Mikea forest, Madagascar. Human Nature 18: 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2005. Draft Programme and Budget: 2006–2007. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  48. Wells, M., and K. Brandon. 1992. People and parks: Linking protected area management with local communities. Washington, DC: The World Bank, U.S. Agency for International Development and World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, E.O. 1992. The diversity of life. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank. 2004. 2004 World development indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benoît G. P. Aymoz
    • 1
  • Vololomboahangy R. Randrianjafy
    • 2
  • Zarasoa J. N. Randrianjafy
    • 3
  • Damase P. Khasa
    • 1
  1. 1.Département des sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Centre d’étude de la forêtUniversité LavalSainte-FoyCanada
  2. 2.Département de Biologie animale et EcologieUniversité de MahajangaMahajangaMadagascar
  3. 3.Direction Provincial du Projet de Soutien au Développement RuralMahajangaMadagascar

Personalised recommendations