AMBIO

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 892–902 | Cite as

Homegardens as a Multi-functional Land-Use Strategy in Sri Lanka with Focus on Carbon Sequestration

  • Eskil Mattsson
  • Madelene Ostwald
  • S. P. Nissanka
  • Buddhi Marambe
Report

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of homegardens and their potential functions as strategic elements in land-use planning, and adaptation and mitigation to climate change in Sri Lanka. The ancient and locally adapted agroforestry system of homegardens is presently estimated to occupy nearly 15 % of the land area in Sri Lanka and is described in the scientific literature to offer several ecosystem services to its users; such as climate regulation, protection against natural hazards, enhanced land productivity and biological diversity, increased crop diversity and food security for rural poor and hence reduced vulnerability to climate change. Our results, based on a limited sample size, indicate that the homegardens also store significant amount of carbon, with above ground biomass carbon stocks in dry zone homegardens (n = 8) ranging from 10 to 55 megagrams of carbon per hectare (Mg C ha−1) with a mean value of 35 Mg C ha−1, whereas carbon stocks in wet zone homegardens (n = 4) range from 48 to 145 Mg C ha−1 with a mean value of 87 Mg C ha−1. This implies that homegardens may contain a significant fraction of the total above ground biomass carbon stock in the terrestrial system in Sri Lanka, and from our estimates its share has increased from almost one-sixth in 1992 to nearly one-fifth in 2010. In the light of current discussions on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), the concept of homegardens in Sri Lanka provides interesting aspects to the debate and future research in terms of forest definitions, setting reference levels, and general sustainability.

Keywords

Land rehabilitation Carbon sequestration and offsets Land-use expansion and intensification REDD+ implications 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Swedish Energy Agency and the Swedish research network Focali for financial support and Ulrik Ilstedt, Gert Nyberg and Sabine Henders for grateful comments on the manuscript. We thank the reviewers for helpful comments and questions that significantly improved the paper.

References

  1. Ariyadasa, K.P. 2002. Assessment of tree resources in the homegardens of Sri Lanka. Bangkok, ECFAO Partnership Programme on Information and Analysis for Sustainable Forest Management (FAO, 2005).Google Scholar
  2. Bayala, J., S.J. Ouedraogo, and Z. Teklehaimanot. 2008. Rejuvenating indigenous trees in agroforestry parkland systems for better fruit production using crown pruning. Agroforestry Systems 72: 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S. 1997. Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: A primer. FAO Forestry Paper 134. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S., A.J.R. Gillespie, and A.E. Lugo. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science 35: 881–902.Google Scholar
  5. Chave, J., C. Andalo, S. Brown, M.A. Cairns, J.Q. Chambers, D. Eamus, H. Folster, F. Fromard, et al. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145: 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chokkalingam, U., and S.A. Vanniarachchy. 2011. Sri Lanka’s REDD potential: Myth or reality? Forest carbon Asia country Profile Report No. 1: Sri Lanka. Forest Carbon Asia. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://www.forestcarbonasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Sri-Lanka-Country-Report-final-23.05.2011.pdf.
  7. De Costa, W.A.J.M., K.S.P. Amaratunga, and R.S. Udumullage. 2006. Transpiration characteristics of some homegarden tree species in central Sri Lanka. In: Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry, ed. Kumar, E.D and P.K.R. Nair, 377 pp. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. De Zoysa, M., and M. Inoue. 2008. Forest governance and community based forest management in Sri Lanka: Past, present and future perspectives. International Journal of Social Forestry 1: 27–49.Google Scholar
  9. Diaz, D., K. Hamilton, and E. Johnson. 2011. State of the Forest Carbon Markets 2011. Ecosystem marketplace. Retrieved February 6, 2012, from http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_2963.pdf.
  10. Dissanayake, W.A.S.S., D.M.S.H.K. Ranasinghe, and S. Wahala. 2009. Estimation of carbon stock in Kandyan Homegardens located in Kandy and Matale. In Proceedings of the 14th International Forestry and Environment Symposium, Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Sri Jayewardenepura.Google Scholar
  11. FAO. 2009. Sri Lanka Forestry Outlook Study. Asia Pacific Forestry Outlook Sector Outlook Study II, Working Paper No. APFSOS II/WP/2009/29, Bangkok, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
  12. Geist, H.J., and E.F. Lambin. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Government of Sri Lanka, 2011. Improving family nutrition, a main objective of Divi Neguma Programme. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http://www.priu.gov.lk/news_update/Current_Affairs/ca201107/20110713improving_family_nutrition.htm.
  14. Henders, S., and M. Ostwald. 2012. Forest carbon leakage quantification methods and their suitability for assessing leakage in REDD. Forest 3: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hett, C., J.-C. Castella, A. Heinimann, P. Messerli, and J.L. Pfund. 2012. A landscape mosaics approach for characterizing swidden systems from a REDD+ perspective. Applied Geography 32: 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hewage, T., A.H.N. Jayasekara, W.R.M.S. Wickramasinghe, I.H.K. Mahanama, G. Gamage, T. Wickramasinghe, M.A, Kumaradasa, H. Gamage, et al. 2002. National action programme for combating land degradation in Sri Lanka, 162 pp. Battaramulla: Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  17. Hulscher, W., and P. Durst. 2000. Global availability of wood energy. AMBIO 29: 180–181.Google Scholar
  18. Jewell, N. 1995. The use of Landsat TM data for estimating the area of homegardens. Special Issue (Remote Sensing). The Sri Lanka Forester (The Ceylon Forester) 20: 79–86.Google Scholar
  19. Kumar, B.M. 2006. Carbon sequestration potential of tropical homegardens. In Tropical homegardens: A time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry, ed. B.M. Kumar, and P.K.R. Nair, 185–204. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Kumar, B.M., and P.K.R. Nair. 2004. The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 61: 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumari, M.A.S., K. Kansuntisukmongkol, and W.Y. Brockelman. 2009. Plant diversity in home gardens and its contribution to household economy in suburban areas in Sri Lanka. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 7: 12–30.Google Scholar
  22. Legg, C., and N. Jewell. 1995. A 1:50 000 scale forest map of Sri Lanka the basis for the National Forest Geographic Information System. Special Issue (Remote Sensing). The Sri Lanka Forester (The Ceylon Forester) 3: 24.Google Scholar
  23. Marambe, B., J. Weerahewa, G. Pushpakumara, P. Silva, R. Punyawardena, S. Premalal, G. Miah, and J. Roy. 2012. Vulnerability of homegarden systems to climate change and its impact on food security in south Asia. Retrieved December 28, 2012, from http://www.apn-gcr.org/resources/archive/files/3ddf57b875774091a38f95bdfee0b6c9.pdf.
  24. Mattsson, E., M. Ostwald, S.P. Nissanka, B. Holmer, and M. Palm. 2009. Recovery and protection of coastal ecosystems after tsunami event and potential for participatory forestry CDM—Examples from Sri Lanka. Ocean and Coastal Management 52: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mattsson, E., U.M. Persson, M. Ostwald, and S.P. Nissanka. 2012. REDD+ readiness implications for Sri Lanka in terms of reducing deforestation. Journal of Environmental Management 100: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MFE. 1995. Sri Lanka Forestry Sector Master Plan. Forestry Planning Unit, Ministry of Forestry and Environment, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka, 511 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Ministry of Environment, 2012. Sri Lanka REDD+ readiness preparation proposal, 209 pp. UN REDD Programme. Final Draft. UN-REDD Programme.Google Scholar
  28. Montagnini, F., and P.K.R. Nair. 2004. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 61: 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nair, P.K.R., and B.M. Kumar. 2006. Introduction. In Tropical homegardens: A time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry, ed. B.M. Kumar, and P.K.R. Nair, 1–10. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Perera, A.H., and R.M.N.A. Rajapakse. 1991. A base study of Kandyan forest gardens of Sri Lanka: Structure, composition and utilization. Forest Ecology and Management 45: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pushpakumara, D.K.N.G., A. Wijesekara, and D.G. Hunter. 2010. Kandyan homegardens: A promising land management system in Sri Lanka. In Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes, ed. C. Belair, K. Ichikawa, B.Y.L. Wong, and K.J. Mulongoy, 102–108. Background to the ‘Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Pushpakumara, D.K.N.G., B. Marambe, G.L.L.P. Silva, J. Weerahewa, and B.V.R. Punyawardena. 2012. A review of research on homegardens in Sri Lanka. The status, importance and future perspective. Tropical Agriculturist 160: 55–125.Google Scholar
  33. Rawat, J.K., S. Dasgupta, R. Kumar, A. Kumar, and K.V.S. Chauhan. 2003. Training manual on inventory of trees outside forests (TOF). Report EC-FAO Partnership Programme (2000–2002), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand, 39 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Reyes, G., S. Brown, J. Chapman, and A.E. Lugo. 1992. Wood densities of tropical tree species. General Technical Report SO-88. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 15 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Roshetko, M., M. Delaney, K. Hairiah, and P. Purnomosidhi. 2002. Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: Can smallholder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage? American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Senanayake, F.R. 1987. Analog forestry as conservation tool. Tiger Paper 15: 25–28.Google Scholar
  37. Tschakert, P., M. Khouma, and M. Sène. 2004. Biophysical potential for soil carbon sequestration in agricultural systems of the Old Peanut Basin of Senegal. Journal of Arid Environments 3: 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UNFCCC. 2005. National communications from parties not included in Annex I to the Convention Compilation and synthesis of initial national communications. FCCC/SBI/2005/18/Add.2.Google Scholar
  39. UNFCCC. 2008. Views on outstanding methodological issues related to policy approaches and positive incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. Paper no 11: Sri Lanka, Item 14. FCCC/SBSTA/2008/MISC.4.Google Scholar
  40. UNFCCC. 2011. Draft decision [-/CP.17] Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention.Google Scholar
  41. UNFCCC. 2012. CDM Statistics. Retrieved June 04, 2012, from http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/Registration/RegisteredProjByScopePieChart.html.
  42. UN-REDD. 2012. UN-REDD Programme approves US$8 million in critical funding for REDD+ in Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka. Retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://www.un-redd.org/PB8_Press_Release/tabid/78557/Default.aspx.
  43. Verchot, L.V., M. Van Noordwijk, S. Kandjii, T. Tomich, C. Ong, A. Albrecht, J. Mackensen, C. Bantilan, et al. 2007. Climate change: Linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12: 901–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weerahewa, J., G. Pushpakumara, P. Silva, C. Daulagala, R. Punyawardena, S. Premalal, G. Miah, J. Roy, et al. 2012. Are homegarden ecosystems resilient to climate change? An analysis of the adaptation strategies of homegardeners in Sri Lanka. APN Science Bulletin 2: 22–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eskil Mattsson
    • 1
  • Madelene Ostwald
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. P. Nissanka
    • 3
  • Buddhi Marambe
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Physical Resource Theory, Department of Energy and EnvironmentChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Water and Environmental StudiesLinköping UniversityNorrköpingSweden
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural Crop Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of PeradeniyaPeradeniyaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations