, Volume 41, Issue 8, pp 873–882 | Cite as

Mercury Levels in Pristine and Gold Mining Impacted Aquatic Ecosystems of Suriname, South America

  • Paul E. Ouboter
  • Gwendolyn A. Landburg
  • Jan H. M. Quik
  • Jan H. A. Mol
  • Frank van der Lugt


Mercury levels in sediment and predatory fish were measured for 53 localities in Suriname. The average mercury level in bottom sediment surpassed the Canadian standard for sediment in most localities, except the coastal plains. Of the predatory fish, 41 % had a mercury level above the European Union standard for human consumption of 0.5 μg g−1. Highest mercury levels were found in fish from the Brokopondo Reservoir and from the Upper Coppename River. High levels of mercury in fish in pristine areas are explained by atmospheric transportation of mercury with the northeastern trade winds followed by wet deposition. Contrary to gold mining areas, where mercury is bound to drifting sediments, in “pristine” areas the mercury is freely available for bio-accumulation and uptake. Impacts on piscivorous reptiles, birds, and mammals are unknown, but likely to be negative.


Mercury pollution Small-scale gold mining Aquatic ecosystems Pristine environment Suriname 



The various projects were funded by WWF-Guianas (Water Quality Monitoring in the Commewijne Watershed Suriname, Mercury Pollution in the Greenstone Belt, Mercury Poisoning in the Brownsweg Village) and the Schure-Beijerinck-Popping Fund (The Impact of Atmospheric Transported Mercury on the Mercury Levels in Water and Biota in the Rivers of Suriname). Several water, sediment, and fish samples were taken during RAP expeditions funded by Conservation International. Work in the field would have been impossible without the assistance of Usha Satnarain, Rawien Jairam, Joyce Metjo, and Indra Asraf-Nanden. Indra and Joyce were also responsible for mercury analysis in the laboratory.


  1. Anderson, A. 1979. Mercury in soils. In The biochemistry of tertiary volcanic rocks in parts of the Virginia City Quadrangle, ed. J.O. Nriagu, 70–112. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Bastos, W.R., J.P.O. Gomes, R.C. Oliveira, R. Almeida, E.L. Nascimento, J.V.E. Bernardi, L.D. de Lacerda, E.G. da Silveira, et al. 2006. Mercury in the environment and the riverside population in the Madeira River Basin, Amazon, Brazil. Science of the Total Environment 368: 344–351.Google Scholar
  3. Bodaly, R.A., J.W.M. Rudo, R.J.P. Fudge, and C.A. Kelly. 1993. Mercury concentrations in fish related to size of remote Canadian Shield Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 980–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boedhram, N. 1988. Climate/Rainfall. In Suriname Planatlas. Washington, DC: National Planning Office of Suriname, Paramaribo/Organization of American States.Google Scholar
  5. Bosma, W., A.G. Ho Len Fat, and C.C. Welter. 1973. Minerals and mining in Suriname. Contributions to the Geology of Suriname 3: 71–101.Google Scholar
  6. Boudou, A., R. Maury-Brachet, G. Durrieu, M. Coquery, and C. Dauta. 2006. Gold mining activities and mercury contamination of freshwater systems in French Guiana—Risks towards human populations. Hydroécologie Appliquée 15: 1–18 (in French, English summary).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1999. Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Mercury. In Canadian environmental quality guidelines. Winnipeg: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.Google Scholar
  8. Clesceri, S.L., A.E. Greenberg, and A.D. Eaton (eds.). 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. Washington: APHA/AWWA/WEF.Google Scholar
  9. De Kom, J.F.M., G.B. Van der Voet, and F.A. de Wolff. 1998. Mercury exposure of Maroon workers in the small scale goldmining in Suriname. Environmental Research 77: 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Vletter, D.R. 1984. Contributions to the Geology of Suriname 8, Geological Mining Division, Mededelingen 27: 11–30.Google Scholar
  11. De Vletter, D.R., and A.L. Hakstege. 1998. The search for gold in Suriname. In The history of earth sciences in Suriname, ed. ThE Wong, D.R. De Vletter, L. Krook, J.I.S. Zonneveld, and A.J. Van Loon, 311–349. Amsterdam: Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO/Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
  12. De Vletter, D.R., S.B. Kroonenberg, A.L. Hakstege, and R.L. Verwey. 1988. Geology and Minerals. In Suriname Planatlas. Washington, DC: National Planning Office of Suriname, Paramaribo/Organization of American States.Google Scholar
  13. Duvall, A.E., and M.G. Barron. 2000. A screening level probabilistic risk assessment of mercury in Florida Everglades food webs. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 47: 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EC. 2002. EC Regulation (221/2002) amending Commission Regulation (EC) no. 466/2001 of 8 March 2001 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. EC, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. Haripersad-Makhanlal, A., and P.E. Ouboter. 1993. Limnology: Physics–chemical parameters and phytoplankton composition. In Freshwater ecosystems of Suriname, ed. P.E. Ouboter, 53–75. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, R.C., and R.A. Bodaly. 1998. Growth and dietary effects on fish mercury dynamics in two Ontario lakes. Biogeochemistry, Vol. 40 (2/3), Fourth International Conference: Mercury as Global Pollutant, March 1998, 175–187.Google Scholar
  17. Keith, P., P.Y. Le Bail, and P. Planquette. 2000. Guide to the freshwater fishes of French Guiana. Vol. 2, part I. Batrachoidiformes, Mugiliformes, Beloniformes, Cyprinodontiformes, Synbranchiformes, Perciformes, Pleuronectiformes, Tetraodontiformes. Paris: Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (in French).Google Scholar
  18. Khan, B., and B. Tansel. 2000. Mercury bioconcentration factors in American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) in the Florida Everglades. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 47: 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lacerda, L.D., E.D. Bidone, A.F. Guimaraes, and W.C. Pfeiffer. 1994. Mercury concentrations in fish from the Itacaiunas-Parauapebas River System. Carajas Region, Amazon. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 66: 373–379.Google Scholar
  20. Lacerda, L.D., W. Salomons, W.C. Pfeiffer, and W.R. Bastos. 1991. Mercury distribution in sediment profiles of remote high Pantanal lakes, Central Brazil. Biogeochemistry 14: 91–97.Google Scholar
  21. Le Bail, P.Y., P. Keith, and P. Planquette. 2000. Guide to the freshwater fishes of French Guiana. Vol. 1, part II. Siluriformes. Paris: Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (in French).Google Scholar
  22. Malm, O., J.R.D. Guimaraes, M.B. Castro, W.R. Bastos, J.P. Viana, F.J.P. Branches, E.G. Silveira, and W.C. Pfeiffer. 1997. Follow-up of mercury levels in fish, human hair and urine in the Madeira and Tapajos basins, Amazon, Brazil. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 97: 45–51.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, J.R., P.J. Lechler, and G. Bridge. 2003. Mercury contamination of alluvial sediments within the Essequibo and Mazaruni River Basins, Guyana. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 148: 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mol, J.H., and P.E. Ouboter. 2004. Downstream effects of erosion from small-scale gold mining on the instream habitat and fish community of a small Neotropical rainforest stream. Conservation Biology 18: 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mol, J.H., J.S. Ramlal, C. Lietar, and M. Verloo. 2001. Mercury contamination in freshwater, estuarine and marine fishes in relation to small-scale gold mining in Suriname, South America. Environmental Research 86: 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mol, J.H., Ph. Willink, B. Chernoff, and M. Cooperman. 2006. Fishes of the Coppename River, Central Suriname Nature Reserve, Suriname. In A rapid biological assessment of the aquatic ecosystems of the Coppename River Basin, Suriname, ed. Alonso, L.E., and H.J. Berrenstein. Executive Summary. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 39: 67–79.Google Scholar
  27. Mol, J.H., B. de Merona, P.E. Ouboter, and S. Sahdew. 2007. The fish fauna of Brokopondo Reservoir, Suriname, during 40 years of impoundment. Neotropical Ichthyology 5(3): 351–368.Google Scholar
  28. Morel, F.M.M., A.M.L. Kraepiel, and M. Amyot. 1998. The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 543–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliveira Ribeiro, C.A., E. Pelletier, W.C. Pfeiffer, and C. Rouleau. 2000. Comparative uptake, bioaccumulation, and gill damages of inorganic mercury in tropical and nordic freshwater fish. Environmental Research 83: 286–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ouboter, P.E. 1996. Ecological studies on crocodilians in Suriname. Niche segregation and competition in three predators, 139. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Ouboter, P.E., and G. Landburg. 2006. Water quality of the Coppename River Basin, with notes on aquatic fauna distribution. In A rapid biological assessment of the aquatic ecosystems of the Coppename River Basin, Suriname, ed. Alonso, L.E., and H.J. Berrenstein. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 39: 37–46.Google Scholar
  32. Pfeiffer, W.C., and L.D. Lacerda. 1988. Mercury inputs into the Amazon region, Brazil. Environmental Technology Letters 9: 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfeiffer, W.C., L.D. Lacerda, O. Malm, C.M.M. Souza, E.G. Silveira, and W.R. Bastos. 1989. Mercury concentrations in inland waters of gold mining areas in Rondonia, Brazil. Science of the Total Environment 87: 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Planquette, P., P. Keith, and P.Y. Le Bail. 1996. Guide to the freshwater fishes of French Guiana, vol. 1. Paris: Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (in French).Google Scholar
  35. Pollack, H., J. de Kom, J. Quik, and L. Zuilen. 1998. Introducing retorts for abatement of mercury pollution in Suriname. Report to Organization of American States. Paramaribo: HWO Consultants.Google Scholar
  36. Richard, S., A. Arnoux, Ph Cerdan, C. Reynouard, and V. Horeau. 2000. Mercury levels of soils, sediments and fish in French Guiana, South America. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 124: 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roulet, M., M. Lucotte, A. Saint-Aubin, S. Tran, I. Rheault, N. Farella, E. De Jesus Da Silva, et al. 1998. The geochemistry of mercury in central Amazonian soils developed on the Alter-do-Chão formation of the lower Tapajos River Valley, Para state, Brazil. Science of the Total Environment 223: 1–24.Google Scholar
  38. Scheuhammer, A.M., M.W. Meyer, M.B. Sandheinrich, and M.W. Murray. 2007. Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. AMBIO 36: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silva-Forsberg, M.C., B.R. Forsberg, and V.K. Zeidemann. 1999. Mercury contamination in humans linked to river chemistry in the Amazon Basin. AMBIO 28(6): 519–521.Google Scholar
  40. Tanan, C.L., D.F. Ventura, J.M. de Souza, S.R. Grotzner, M. Mela, A. Gouvela Jr, and C.A. Oliveira-Ribeiro. 2006. Effects of mercury intoxication on the response of horizontal cells of the retina of thraira fish (Hoplias malabaricus). Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 39: 987–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. UNESCO. 2011. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 9 Sept 2011.
  42. US EPA. 1991. Methods for determination of metals in environmental samples. Cincinnati: Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory Office of Research and Development US EPA.Google Scholar
  43. US EPA. 1994. Water quality standards handbook, 2nd ed. USEPA Water Resource Center. United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA-823-B-94-005. Washington, DC: EPA.Google Scholar
  44. US EPA. 1997. Mercury study report to Congress. Volume VI: An ecological assessment for anthropogenic mercury emissions in the United States. Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards and Office of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA-452/R-97-008. Washington, DC: EPA.Google Scholar
  45. Veiga, M.M. 1997. Introducing new technologies for abatement of global mercury pollution in Latin America, 94. Rio de Janeiro: UNIDO/University of British Columbia/Center for Mineral Technology.Google Scholar
  46. Watras, C.J., K.A. Morrison, and Jodi S. Host. 1995. Concentration of mercury species in relationship to other site-specific factors in the surface waters of northern Wisconsin Lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 40: 556–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul E. Ouboter
    • 1
  • Gwendolyn A. Landburg
    • 2
  • Jan H. M. Quik
    • 3
  • Jan H. A. Mol
    • 4
  • Frank van der Lugt
    • 5
  1. 1.National Zoological Collection/Center of Environmental ResearchAnton de Kom University of SurinameParamariboSuriname
  2. 2.Environmental Department, National Zoological Collection/Center of Environmental ResearchAnton de Kom University of SurinameParamariboSuriname
  3. 3.Chemistry Department, Central LaboratoryOffice of Public HealthParamariboSuriname
  4. 4.Biology & Chemistry Department, Faculty of TechnologyAnton de Kom University of SurinameParamariboSuriname
  5. 5.Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of TechnologyAnton de Kom University of SurinameParamariboSuriname

Personalised recommendations